skip to main content
10.1145/1805986.1806002acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Application of traditional software testing methodologies to web accessibility

Published:26 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

The shift in nature of Web content from static documents to dynamic Rich Internet Applications (RIA) has not been accompanied by a similar shift in testing methodology. RIAs are software applications, and as such can benefit from the testing methodologies used in the field of software development. Because this shift in nature is fairly recent, traditional software testing methodology has not been given the importance it is due within the domain of accessibility. We will attempt to show the merits of Traditional Software Testing as applied to the domain of Web accessibility, and to make the case for a shift of focus from post hoc validation to proactive testing as the preferred means of assuring accessibility for Web sites and applications.

References

  1. Loveland, Scott; et al, Software Testing Techniques: Finding the Defects that Matter, Charles River Media 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. PAS 78 2006, Equality and Human Rights Commission, UK. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/footer/accessibility-statement/general-web-accessibility-guidance/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. "RNIB Testing Tips" http://www.rnib.org.uk/professionals/webaccessibility/testingtips/Pages/testing_tips.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. "Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility", W3C Web Accessibility Initiative, http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/usersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Henry, Shawn, "Just Ask: Integrating Accessibility Throughout Design", 2003 http://www.uiaccess.com/accessucd/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ludi, S., Introducing Accessibility Requirements through external stakeholder utilization in an undergraduate requirements engineering course, ICSE 2007, 736--742 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andreas Birk, Torgeir Dingsøyr, Tor Stålhane, "Postmortem: Never Leave a Project without It," IEEE Software, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 43--45, May/June 2002, doi:10.1109/MS.2002.1003452 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. Collier, T. DeMarco, and P. Fearey, "A defined process for project post mortem review," IEEE Software, vol. 13, pp. 65--72, 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Outi Salo, Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering pp184--193: Springer 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Boehm, B. W., Software Engineering Economics, Prentice-Hall, 1981Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Damm, L-O., Lundberg, L, Company-Wide Implementation of Metrics for Early Software Fault Detection, ICSE 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kamer, C., The Ongoing Revolution in Software Testing, Software Test & Performance Conference, December 8, 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chisnell, D., Usability Testing Demystified, A List Apart (Oct 6, 2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Austin, R., Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations, Dorset House 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sunghun Kim, Predicting Faults from Cached History, ICSE 2007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kam, B. and Dean, T., Lessons learned from a survey of Web Applications Testing, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tran, E. (1999). "Verification/Validation/Certification". in Koopman, P. Topics in Dependable Embedded Systems. Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/des_s99/verification/index.html. Retrieved 2007-05-18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Leon, J. and Lori, A., Continuous Self-Evaluation for the Self-Improvement of Software, Self-Adaptive Software, pp 27--39, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bertolino, A., Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, SWEBOK IEEE, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Application of traditional software testing methodologies to web accessibility

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      W4A '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)
      April 2010
      223 pages
      ISBN:9781450300452
      DOI:10.1145/1805986

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      W4A '10 Paper Acceptance Rate10of32submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader