skip to main content
10.1145/1806689.1806743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Budget constrained auctions with heterogeneous items

Published:05 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present the first approximation algorithms for the problem of designing revenue optimal Bayesian incentive compatible auctions when there are multiple (heterogeneous) items and when bidders have arbitrary demand and budget constraints (and additive valuations). Our mechanisms are surprisingly simple: We show that a sequential all-pay mechanism is a 4 approximation to the revenue of the optimal ex-interim truthful mechanism with a discrete type space for each bidder, where her valuations for different items can be correlated. We also show that a sequential posted price mechanism is a O(1) approximation to the revenue of the optimal ex-post truthful mechanism when the type space of each bidder is a product distribution that satisfies the standard hazard rate condition. We further show a logarithmic approximation when the hazard rate condition is removed, and complete the picture by showing that achieving a sub-logarithmic approximation, even for regular distributions and one bidder, requires pricing bundles of items. Our results are based on formulating novel LP relaxations for these problems, and developing generic rounding schemes from first principles.

References

  1. Z. Abrams. Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets. In SODA, pages 1074--1082, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. M. Ausubel. An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. American Economic Review, 94(5):1452--1475, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. M. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. Ascending auctions with package bidding. Working Paper, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Benoit and V. Krishna. Multiple-object auctions with budget constrained bidders. Review of Economic Studies, 68:155--179, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Bhattacharya, V. Conitzer, K. Munagala, and L. Xia. Incentive compatible budget elicitation in multi-unit auctions. In SODA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. C. Border. Reduced form auctions revisited. Economic Theory, 31(1):167--181, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Borgs, J. T. Chayes, N. Immorlica, M. Mahdian, and A. Saberi. Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 44---51, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Briest. Uniform budgets and the envy-free pricing problem. In ICALP(1), pages 808--819, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Briest, S. Chawla, R. D. Kleinberg, and S. M. Weinberg. Pricing randomized allocations. In SODA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Brusco and G. Lopomo. Simultaneous ascending bid auctions with privately known budget constraints. Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(1):113--142, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, and R. D. Kleinberg. Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 243--251, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Chawla, J. D. Hartline, D. Malec, and B. Sivan. Sequential posted pricing and multi-parameter mechanism design. In STOC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Che and J. Gale. Expected revenue of the all-pay auctions and first-price sealed bid auctions with budget constraints. Economic Letters, 50:373--380, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Y. Che and J. Gale. The optimal mechanism for selling to a budget constrained buyer. Journal of Economic Theory, 92(2):198--233, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. N. Chen, N. Immorlica, A. R. Karlin, M. Mahdian, and A. Rudra. Approximating matches made in heaven. In ICALP(1), pages 266--278, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Dobzinski, R. Lavi, and N. Nisan. Multi-unit auctions with budget limits. In FOCS, pages 260--269, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Elkind and S. S. Fatima. Maximizing revenue in sequential auctions. In WINE, pages 491--502, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. V. Goldberg, J. D. Hartline, and A. Wright. Competitive auctions and digital goods. In SODA, pages 735--744, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. V. Guruswami, J. D. Hartline, A. R. Karlin, D. Kempe, C. Kenyon, and F. McSherry. On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing. In SODA, pages 1164--1173, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. I. Hafalir, R. Ravi, and A. Sayedi. Sort-cut: Apareto optimal and semi-truthful mechanism for multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders. CoRR, abs/0903.1450, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. D. Hartline and T. Roughgarden. Simple versus optimal mechanisms. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 225--234, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J.-J. Lafont and J. Robert. Optimal auction with financially constrained buyers. Economic Letters, 52(2):181--186, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. A. M. Manellia and D. R. Vincent. Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1):153--185, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R. B. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1):58--73, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. N. Nisan. Google's auction for tv ads. In ESA, page 553, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Pai and R. Vohra. Optimal auctions with financially constrained bidders. Working Paper, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Thanassoulis. Haggling over substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory, 117(2):217--245, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. R. B. Wilson. Nonlinear Pricing. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Budget constrained auctions with heterogeneous items

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '10: Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing
      June 2010
      812 pages
      ISBN:9781450300506
      DOI:10.1145/1806689

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 June 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader