skip to main content
10.1145/1822090.1822120acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mental models of recursion: investigating students' understanding of recursion

Published:26 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mental models of recursion provide some idea into a student's understanding of recursion. However there has been concern regarding whether viable trace mental models of recursion show students' true understanding of recursion. We have conducted an investigation to further examine the understanding of recursion of students with viable trace mental models. The investigation looked at students' understanding of the termination of a recursive function, their descriptive mental models and their ability to generate a recursive function. This research provides evidence to show that trace methods are essentially mechanical processes that can allow students with little understanding of recursion to correctly evaluate a recursive function but that students do not fully understand recursion and in particular have difficulties with the passive flow. Based on the results of the study, this paper discusses possible changes that can be made to our teaching in order to more eectively teach recursion to first year students.

References

  1. C. George. EROSI: visualising recursion and discovering new errors. In Proceedings of the 31st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 305--309, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. George. Experiences with novices: The importance of graphical representations in supporting mental models. In Blackwell A.F and Bilotta E(Eds), In Proceedings of the Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, pages 33--44, Apr. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Goldschlager and A. Lister. Computer Science: A Modern Introduction. Prentice Hall, Engelwood Clis, New Jersey, USA, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Götschi, I. Sanders, and V. Galpin. Mental models of recursion. In Proceedings of the 34th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 346--350, Feb. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H. Kahney. What do novice programmers know about recursion? In E. Soloway and J. Spohrer, editors, Studying the Novice Programmer, pages 209--228. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Levy and T. Lapidot. Recursively speaking: Analyzing students' discourse of recursive phenomena. In Proceedings of the 31th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 315--319, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. Manis and J. Little. The Schematics of Computation. Prentice Hall, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Mpofu. FAC course notes, 2009. These notes were compiled by Professor Ian Sanders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Pirolli and R. Anderson, J.R. Farrell. Learning to program recursion. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science Conference, Boulder, pages 277--280, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Sanders and V. Galpin. Students' mental models of recursion at Wits. In Proceedings of ITiCSE' 07, page 317, June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. I. Sanders, V. Galpin, and T. Götschi. Mental models of recursion revisited. In Proceedings of ITiCSE' 06, pages 138--142, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Stasko, A. Bare, and C. Lewis. Do algorithm animators assist learning? an empirical study and analysis. In Proceedings of the INTERCHI 93 Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, pages 61--66, Apr. 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Wiedenbeck. Learning recursion as a concept and as a programming technique. SIGCSE Bulletin, 20(1):275--278, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Wilcocks and I. Sanders. Animating recursion as a aid to instruction. Computers and Education, 23(3):221--226, Nov. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mental models of recursion: investigating students' understanding of recursion

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ITiCSE '10: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
          June 2010
          344 pages
          ISBN:9781605588209
          DOI:10.1145/1822090

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 June 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

          Upcoming Conference

          ITiCSE 2024

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader