skip to main content
10.1145/1822258.1822279acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswikisymConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring author contributions to the Wikipedia

Published:08 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of measuring user contributions to versioned, collaborative bodies of information, such as wikis. Measuring the contributions of individual authors can be used to divide revenue, to recognize merit, to award status promotions, and to choose the order of authors when citing the content. In the context of the Wikipedia, previous works on author contribution estimation have focused on two criteria: the total text created, and the total number of edits performed. We show that neither of these criteria work well: both techniques are vulnerable to manipulation, and the total-text criterion fails to reward people who polish or re-arrange the content.

We consider and compare various alternative criteria that take into account the quality of a contribution, in addition to the quantity, and we analyze how the criteria differ in the way they rank authors according to their contributions. As an outcome of this study, we propose to adopt total edit longevity as a measure of author contribution. Edit longevity is resistant to simple attacks, since edits are counted towards an author's contribution only if other authors accept the contribution. Edit longevity equally rewards people who create content, and people who rearrange or polish the content. Finally, edit longevity distinguishes the people who contribute little (who have contribution close to zero) from spammers or vandals, whose contribution quickly grows negative.

References

  1. B. T. Adler, J. Benterou, K. Chatterjee, L. de Alfaro, I. Pye, and V. Raman. Assigning trust to wikipedia content. Technical Report UCSC-CRL-07-09, School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. T. Adler and L. de Alfaro. A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. In Proc. of the 16th Intl. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2007). ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Burke and R. Kraut. Taking up the mop: identifying future Wikipedia administrators. In CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3441--3446, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. Cormode and S. Muthukrishnan. The string edit distance matching problem with moves. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 3(1):2, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. Cunningham and B. Leuf. The Wiki Way. Quick Collaboration on the Web. Addison-Wesley, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. E. Park et al. Software size measurement: A framework for counting source statements. Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-020, Carnegie Mellon University, September 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. L. Giles and I. G. Councill. Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgement indexing. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(51):17599--17604, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Kittur, E. Chi, B. A. Pendleton, B. Suh, and T. Mytkowicz. Power of the Few vs. Wisdom of the Crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the Bourgeoisie. Alt. CHI, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N. Korfiatis, M. Poulos, and G. Bokos. Evaluating authoritative source using social networks: an insight from Wikipedia. Online Information Review, 30(3):252--262, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. V. I. Levenshtein. Binary codes capable of correcting insertions and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl., 10:707--710, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. L. McGuinness, H. Zeng, P. P. da Silva, L. Ding, D. Narayanan, and M. Bhaowal. Investigation into trust for collaborative information repositories: A Wikipedia case study. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Models of Trust for the Web, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. F. Ortega and J. M. G. Barahona. Quantitative analysis of the Wikipedia community of users. In WikiSym '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, pages 75--86, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2007. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. P. Schultz. Software management metrics. Technical Report AD-A196 916, MITRE, May 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Shirky. Gin, television, and social surplus. http://www.herecomeseverybody.org/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html, April 2008. (Retrieved on 9-May-2008.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Stein and C. Hess. Does it matter who contributes: a study on featured articles in the german wikipedia. In HT '07: Proceedings of the 18th conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 171--174, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Suh, E. H. Chi, A. Kittur, and B. A. Pendleton. Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard. In CHI '08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1037--1040, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Swartz. Who writes Wikipedia? http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia, September 2006. (Retrieved on 9-May-2008.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W. F. Tichy. The string-to-string correction problem with block move. ACM Trans. on Computer Systems, 2(4), 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Voß. Measuring wikipedia. In Proc. of the 10th Intl. Conf. of the ISSI, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Robert A. Wagner and Michael J. Fischer. The string-to-string correction problem. J. ACM, 21(1):168--173, 1974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Wales. Wikipedia, emergence, and the wisdom of crowds. http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2005-May/021764.html, May 2005. (Retrieved 9-May-2008.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. M. Wilkinson and B. A. Huberman. Cooperation and quality in wikipedia. In WikiSym '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, pages 157--164, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Measuring author contributions to the Wikipedia

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WikiSym '08: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis
            September 2008
            219 pages
            ISBN:9781605581286
            DOI:10.1145/1822258

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 September 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate69of145submissions,48%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader