skip to main content
10.1145/1835449.1835486acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Temporal diversity in recommender systems

Published:19 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative Filtering (CF) algorithms, used to build web-based recommender systems, are often evaluated in terms of how accurately they predict user ratings. However, current evaluation techniques disregard the fact that users continue to rate items over time: the temporal characteristics of the system's top-N recommendations are not investigated. In particular, there is no means of measuring the extent that the same items are being recommended to users over and over again. In this work, we show that temporal diversity is an important facet of recommender systems, by showing how CF data changes over time and performing a user survey. We then evaluate three CF algorithms from the point of view of the diversity in the sequence of recommendation lists they produce over time. We examine how a number of characteristics of user rating patterns (including profile size and time between rating) affect diversity. We then propose and evaluate set methods that maximise temporal recommendation diversity without extensively penalising accuracy.

References

  1. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. In ACM TOIS, volume 22, pages 5--53, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Mull. Characteristics of High-Volume Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of Recommenders '06, Bilbao, Spain, September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Koren. Collaborative Filtering With Temporal Dynamics. In ACM KDD, Paris, France, June 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Lathia, S. Hailes, and L. Capra. Temporal Collaborative Filtering With Adaptive Neighbourhoods. In ACM SIGIR, Boston, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Towards the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE TKDE, 17(6), June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S.M. McNee, S.K. Lam, C. Guetzlaff, J.A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Confidence Displays and Training in Recommender Systems. In ACM CHI, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Burke. Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Radlinski and S. Dumais. Improving Personalized Web Search Using Result Diversification. In ACM SIGIR, Seattle, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying Search Results. In ACM WSDM, Barcelona, Spain, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Hawking, T. Rowlands, and P. Thomas. C-TEST: Supporting Novelty and Diversity in Testfiles for Search Evaluation. In ACM SIGIR Workshop on Redundancy, Diversity and Interdependent Document Relevance, Boston, USA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Smyth and P. McClave. Similarity vs. Diversity. In 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Vancouver, Canada, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Zhang and N. Hurley. Avoiding Monotony: Improving the Diversity of Recommendation Lists. In ACM RecSys, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Temporal diversity in recommender systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '10: Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
        July 2010
        944 pages
        ISBN:9781450301534
        DOI:10.1145/1835449

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 July 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '10 Paper Acceptance Rate87of520submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader