skip to main content
10.1145/1840784.1840804acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiixConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A subjective logic formalisation of the principle of polyrepresentation for information needs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive Information Retrieval refers to the branch of Information Retrieval that considers the retrieval process with respect to a wide range of contexts, which may affect the user's information seeking experience. The identification and representation of such contexts has been the object of the principle of Polyrepresentation, a theoretical framework for reasoning about different representations arising from interactive information retrieval in a given context. Although the principle of Polyrepresentation has received attention from many researchers, not much empirical work has been done based on it. One reason may be that it has not yet been formalised mathematically.

In this paper we propose an up-to-date and flexible mathematical formalisation of the principle of Polyrepresentation for information needs. Specifically, we apply Subjective Logic to model different representations of information needs as beliefs marked by degrees of uncertainty. We combine such beliefs using different logical operators, and we discuss these combinations with respect to different retrieval scenarios and situations. A formal model is introduced and discussed, with illustrative applications to the modelling of information needs.

References

  1. F. Baader. Terminological Cycles in KL-ONE based Knowledge Representation Languages. In AAAI, pages 621--626, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Bruza and T. P. van der Weide. Stratified Hypermedia Structures for Information Disclosure. Comput. J., 35(3):208--220, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. P. Chevallet. Un Modèle Logique de Recherche d'Information Appliqué au Formalisme des Graphes Conceptuels. Le Prototype ELEN et son Experimentation sur un Corpus de Composants Logiciels. PhD in Computer Science, University of Joseph Fourier, Grenoble I, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Chiaramella and J. P. Chevallet. About Retrieval Models and Logic. Comput. J., 35(3):233--242, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Crestani. Logical Models of Information Retrieval. In L. Liu and M. T. Özsu, editors, Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pages 1652--1658. Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Crestani and C. J. van Rijsbergen. Retrieval by Logical Imaging. Journal of Documentation, 51(1):1--15, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. P. Dempster. A Generalization of Bayesian Inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B(30):205--247, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. J. Devlin. Logic and Information. CUP, Cambridge, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Dezert. An Introduction to the Theory of Plausible and Paradoxical Reasoning. In Numerical Methods and Applications, pages 12--23, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Diriye, A. Blandford, and A. Tombros. A Polyrepresentational Approach to Interactive Query Expansion. In JCDL, pages 217--220, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Representation and Combination of Uncertainty with Belief Functions and Possibility Measures. Computational Intelligence, 4:244--264, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Efron and M. Winget. Query Polyrepresentation for Ranking Retrieval Systems Without Relevance Judgments. JASIST, 2010 forthcoming. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. C. Fishburn. The Axioms of Subjective Probability. Statistical Science, 3(1):335--345, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. I. Frommholz, B. Larsen, B. Piwowarski, M. Lalmas, P. Ingwersen, and C. J. van Rijsbergen. Supporting Polyrepresentation in a Quantum-inspired Geometrical Retrieval Framework. In IIiX, 2010 forthcoming. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. E. Hughes and M. J. Cresswell. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. E. Hughes and M. J. Cresswell. An Introduction to Modal Logic. Methuen, London, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. W. C. Huibers, M. Lalmas, and C. J. van Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval and Situation Theory. SIGIR Forum, 30(1):11--25, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Ingwersen. Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction - Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1):3--50, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. Ingwersen and K. J¨arvelin. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (The Information Retrieval Series). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Y. Nie and F. Lepage and M. Brisebois. Information Retrieval as Counterfactual. Computer Journal, 38(8):643--657, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. A. Jøsang. A Logic for Uncertain Probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(3):279--212, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Jøsang. The Consensus Operator for Combining Beliefs. Artif. Intell., 141(1/2):157--170, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Jøsang, J. Diaz, and M. Rifqi. Cumulative and Averaging Fusion of Beliefs. Information Fusion, 11(2):192--200, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Kelly and X. Fu. Eliciting Better Information Need Descriptions from Users of Information Search Systems. Inf. Process. Manage., 43(1):30--46, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Lalmas. Logical Models in Information Retrieval: Introduction and Overview. Inf. Process. Manage., 34(1):19--33, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. B. Larsen. Practical Implications of Handling Multiple Contexts in the Principle of Polyrepresentation. In CoLIS, pages 20--31, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Larsen and P. Ingwersen. Cognitive Overlaps along the Polyrepresentation Continuum. New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval, pages 43--60, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. B. Larsen, P. Ingwersen, and J. Kekäläinen. The Polyrepresentation Continuum in IR. In IIiX, pages 88--96, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. B. Larsen, P. Ingwersen, and B. Lund. Data Fusion According to the Principle of Polyrepresentation. JASIST, 60(4):646--654, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. R. Y. K. Lau, P. D. Bruza, and D. Song. Towards a Belief-Revision-Based Adaptive and Context-Sensitive Information Retrieval System. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 26(2), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. V. D. Lecce and A. Amato. A Fuzzy Logic Based Approach to Feedback Reinforcement in Image Retrieval. In D.-S. Huang, K.-H. Jo, H.-H. Lee, H.-J. Kang, and V. Bevilacqua, editors, ICIC (1), volume 5754 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 939--947. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. E. Lefevre, O. Colot, and P. Vannoorenberghe. Belief Function Combination and Conflict Management. Information Fusion, 3(2):149--162, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. S. Linckels and C. Meinel. Applications of Description Logics to Improve Multimedia Information Retrieval for Efficient Educational Tools. In Multimedia Information Retrieval, pages 321--328, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. C. Lioma, R. Blanco, R. M. Palau, and M.-F. Moens. A Belief Model of Query Difficulty that Uses Subjective Logic. In ICTIR, pages 92--103, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. B. Logan, S. Reece, and K. Sparck Jones. Modelling Information Retrieval Agents with Belief Revision. In SIGIR, pages 91--100, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. D. E. Losada and A. Barreiro. A Logical Model for Information Retrieval based on Propositional Logic and Belief Revision. Computer Journal, 44(5):410--424, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. M. Lykke, B. Larsen, H. Lund, and P. Ingwersen. Developing a Test Collection for the Evaluation of Integrated Search. In C. Gurrin, Y. He, G. Kazai, U. Kruschwitz, S. Little, T. Roelleke, S. Rueger, and K. van Rijsbergen, editors, ECIR, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 627--630. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. C. Meghini, F. Sebastiani, U. Straccia, and C. Thanos. A Model of Information Retrieval Based on a Terminological Logic. In SIGIR, pages 298--307, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. A. Müller and S. Kutschekmanesch. Using Abductive Inference and Dynamic Indexing to Retrieve Multimedia SGML Documents. In I. Ruthven, editor, MIRO, Workshops in Computing. BCS, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. C. K. Murphy. Combining Belief Functions when Evidence Conflicts. Decision Support Systems, 29(1):1--9, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. J.-Y. Nie. Towards a Probabilistic Modal Logic for Semantic-based Information Retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 140--151, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. M. Oussalah, S. Khan, and S. Nefti. Personalized Information Retrieval System in the Framework of Fuzzy Logic. Expert Syst. Appl., 35(1-2):423--433, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. V. Plachouras and I. Ounis. Dempster-Shafer Theory for a Query-Biased Combination of Evidence on the Web. Inf. Retr., 8(2):197--218, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. S. Radhouani and G. Falquet. Description Logics-Based Modelling for Precise Information Retrieval. In F. Baader, C. Lutz, and B. Motik, editors, Description Logics, volume 353 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. L. J. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. Dover Publications, Inc, New York, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. G. Shafer. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. L. Shi, J.-Y. Nie, and G. Cao. Relating Dependent Indexes Using Dempster-Shafer Theory. In CIKM, pages 429--438, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. N. Simou, T. Athanasiadis, G. Stoilos, and S. D. Kollias. Image Indexing and Retrieval Using Expressive Fuzzy Description Logics. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 2(4):321--335, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. M. Skov, B. Larsen, and P. Ingwersen. Inter and Intra-Document Contexts Applied in Polyrepresentation for Best Match IR. Inf. Process. Manage., 44(5):1673--1683, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. F. Smarandache. An In-Depth Look at Information Fusion Rules & the Unification of Fusion Theories. CoRR, cs.OH/0410033, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. P. Smets. The Combination of Evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 12(5):447--458, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. P. Smets. What is Dempster-Shafer's model? Wiley, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. P. Smets and R. Kennes. The Transferable Belief Model. Artif. Intell., 66(2):191--234, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. J. F. Sowa. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. T. Tsikrika and M. Lalmas. Combining Evidence for Web Retrieval Using the Inference Network Model: an Experimental Study. Inf. Process. Manage., 40(5):751--772, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. C. J. van Rijsbergen. A Non-Classical Logic for Information Retrieval. Comput. J., 29(6):481--485, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. C. J. van Rijsbergen. The Geometry of Information Retrieval. CUP, Cambridge, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. C. J. van Rijsbergen, F. Crestani, and M. Lalmas. Information Retrieval: Uncertainty and Logics. Springer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. E. M. Voorhees and L. P. Buckland. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference, TREC. volume Special Publication 500--266. NIST, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. R. R. Yager. On the Dempster-Shafer Framework and New Combination Rules. Inf. Sci., 41(2):93--137, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. G. Zuccon, L. Azzopardi, and C. J. van Rijsbergen. A Formalization of Logical Imaging for Information Retrieval Using Quantum Theory. In DEXA Workshops, pages 3--8. IEEE Computer Society, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A subjective logic formalisation of the principle of polyrepresentation for information needs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IIiX '10: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context
      August 2010
      408 pages
      ISBN:9781450302470
      DOI:10.1145/1840784

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 August 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate21of45submissions,47%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader