skip to main content
10.1145/1851182.1851203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements

Published:30 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

RSSI is known to be a fickle indicator of whether a wireless link will work, for many reasons. This greatly complicates operation because it requires testing and adaptation to find the best rate, transmit power or other parameter that is tuned to boost performance. We show that, for the first time, wireless packet delivery can be accurately predicted for commodity 802.11 NICs from only the channel measurements that they provide. Our model uses 802.11n Channel State Information measurements as input to an OFDM receiver model we develop by using the concept of effective SNR. It is simple, easy to deploy, broadly useful, and accurate. It makes packet delivery predictions for 802.11a/g SISO rates and 802.11n MIMO rates, plus choices of transmit power and antennas. We report testbed experiments that show narrow transition regions (<2 dB for most links) similar to the near-ideal case of narrowband, frequency-flat channels. Unlike RSSI, this lets us predict the highest rate that will work for a link, trim transmit power, and more. We use trace-driven simulation to show that our rate prediction is as good as the best rate adaptation algorithms for 802.11a/g, even over dynamic channels, and extends this good performance to 802.11n.

References

  1. IEEE Std. 802.11n-2009: Enhancements for higher throughputGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Intel Wireless WiFi Link drivers for Linux. http://intellinuxwireless.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Aguayo et al. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. O. Awoniyi and F. A. Tobagi. Packet error rate in OFDM-based wireless LANs operating in frequency selective channels. IEEE INFOCOM, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. C. Bicket. Bit-rate selection in wireless networks. Master's thesis, MIT, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Camp and E. Knightly. Modulation rate adaptation in urban and vehicular environments: cross-layer implementation and experimental evaluation. In ACM MobiCom, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Eriksson, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden. Cabernet: Vehicular content delivery using WiFi. In ACM MobiCom, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Goldsmith. Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Jamieson and H. Balakrishnan. PPR: Partial packet recovery for wireless networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Judd, X. Wang, and P. Steenkiste. Efficient channel-aware rate adaptation in dynamic environments. In ACM MobiSys, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Kant and T. L. Jensen. Fast link adaptation for IEEE 802.11n. Master's thesis, Aalborg University, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. W. Kim et al. An experimental evaluation of rate adaptation for multi-antenna systems. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Lampe et al. Misunderstandings about link adaptation for frequency selective fading channels. In IEEE PIMRC, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. C.-J. Lin, N. Kushman, and D. Katabi. ZipTx: Harnessing partial packets in 802.11 networks. In ACM MobiCom, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Liu, L. Cai, H. Yang, and D. Li. EESM based link error prediction for adaptive MIMO-OFDM system. In IEEE VTC, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. Martorell, F. Riera-Palou, and G. Femenias. Cross-layer link adaptation for IEEE 802.11n. In Cross Layer Design (IWCLD), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. P. Monks, V. Bharghavan, and W. M. W. Hwu. A power controlled multiple access protocol for wireless packet networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S. Nanda and K. M. Rege. Frame error rates for convolutional codes on fading channels and the concept of effective Eb=N0. In IEEE VTC, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nortel Networks. Effective SIR computation for OFDM system-level simulations. 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #35, R1-031370, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H. Rahul, F. Edalat, D. Katabi, and C. Sodini. Frequency-aware rate adaptation and MAC protocols. In ACM MobiCom, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Ramachandran, R. Kokku, H. Zhang, and M. Gruteser. Symphony: synchronous two-phase rate and power control in 802.11 WLANs. In ACM MobiSys, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. Reis, R. Mahajan, M. Rodrig, D. Wetherall, and J. Zahorjan. Measurement-based models of delivery and interference in static wireless networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Sen, N. Santhapuri, R. R. Choudhury, and S. Nelakuditi. AccuRate: Constellation based rate estimation in wireless networks. In USENIX NSDI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Smithies and F. Fietkau. minstrel: MadWiFi and Linux kernel rate selection algorithm, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Son, B. Krishnamachari, and J. Heidemann. Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE SECON, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. V. Tralli. Efficient simulation of frame and bit error rate in wireless systems with convolutional codes and correlated fading channels. IEEE WCNC, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. Tse and P. Viswanath. Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Vutukuru, H. Balakrishnan, and K. Jamieson. Cross-layer wireless bit rate adaptation. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. H. Y. Wong, H. Yang, S. Lu, and V. Bharghavan. Robust rate adaptation for 802.11 wireless networks. In ACM MobiCom, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Zhang et al. A practical SNR-guided rate adaptation. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In ACM SenSys, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predictable 802.11 packet delivery from wireless channel measurements

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '10: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference
        August 2010
        500 pages
        ISBN:9781450302012
        DOI:10.1145/1851182
        • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 40, Issue 4
          SIGCOMM '10
          October 2010
          481 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/1851275
          Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 August 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader