skip to main content
10.1145/1867699.1867704acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Activity identification from GPS trajectories using spatial temporal POIs' attractiveness

Published:02 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

GPS (Globe Positioning System) trajectory data provide a new way for city travel analysis others than traditional travel diary data. But generally raw GPS traces do not include information on trip purposes or activities. Earlier studies addressed this issue through a combination of manual and computer-assisted data processing steps. Nevertheless, geographic context databases provide the possibility for automatic activity identification based on GPS trajectories since each activity is uniquely defined by a set of features such as location and duration. Distinguished with most existing methods using two dimensional factors, this paper presents a novel approach using spatial temporal attractiveness of POIs (Point of Interests) to identify activity-locations as well as durations from raw GPS trajectory. We also introduce an algorithm to figure out how the intersections of trajectories and spatial-temporal attractiveness prisms indicate the potential possibilities for activities. Finally, Experiments using real world GPS tracking data, road networks and POIs are conducted for evaluations of the proposed approach.

References

  1. Wagner, D. P. Lexington Area Travel Data Collection Test: GPS for Personal Travel Surveys. Final Report. Office of Highway Policy Information and Office of Technology Applications, Battelle Transport Division (FHWA, Columbus, Ohio, Sept. 1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jean Wolf, Randall Guensler, William Bachman, Elimination of the Travel Diary: An Experiment to Derive Trip Purpose From GPS Travel Data, 2001. Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting (January 7-11, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stefan Schönfelder and Kay W. Axhausen, Exploring the potentials of automatically collected GPS data for travel behaviour analysis- A Swedish data source, 2002, GI-Technologien für Verkehr und Logistik, 13, pp.155--179(2002)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kay W. Axhausen, Stefan Schönfelder, J Wolf, M. Oliveira, U Samaga, 80 weeks of GPS-traces: Approaches to enriching the trip information, 2003, 83rd Transportation Research Board Meeting(2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. B. Kochan, T. Bellemans, D. Janssens and G. Wets, Dynamic activity-travel data collection using a GPS-enabled personal digital assistant, 2006, Proceedings of the ninth International Conference on AATT, pp.319--324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nadine Schuessler and Kay W. Axhausen, Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems Without Additional Information, 2009, Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, Issue 2105, pp.28--36 (2009).DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2105-04.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Harvey J. Miller, Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis, 2004, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1467-8306, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp. 284--289( 2004) DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402005.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey J. Miller, Activities in space and time, P. Stopher, K. Button, K. Haynes and D. Hensher (eds.) Handbook of Transport 5: Transport Geography and Spatial Systems, 2004, Pergamon/Elsevier Science (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Terry Griffin, Yan Huang, A Decision Tree Classification Model to Automate Trip Purpose Derivation, 2005, CAINE: 44-49(2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel Ashbrook, Thad Starner, Using GPS to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Volume 7, pp.275--286 (2003). DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0240-0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wendy Bohte, Kees Maat, Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: A large-scale application in the Netherlands, Transportation Research Part C, Volume 17, pp.285--297(2009) DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2008.11.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kexin Xie, Ke Deng, Xiaofang Zhou. From Trajectories to Activities: A Spatio-Temporal Join Approach. 2009. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks (Seattle, Washington, The USA, 2009). CHI '00. ACM, New York, NY, 25-32 DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629890.1629897 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lian Huang, Qingquan Li, Automatic activity identification from raw GPS vehicle tracking data, 2010, Proceedings of the Canadian Geomatics Conference.(2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Donald J. Patterson, Lin Liao, Dieter Fox, and Kautz, 2003, Inferring High -- Level Behaviour from Low-Level Sensors, Ubiquitous Computing, 5th International Conference (Seattle, WA, USA, October 12-15, 2003) DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39653-6_6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin Liao, Dieter Fox and Henry Kautz, Location-Based Activity Recognition using Relational Markov Networks, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2005) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Christoph Teller, Thomas Reutterer, The evolving concept of retail attractiveness: What makes retail agglomerations attractive when customers shop at them?, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 15 (2008) 127--143, DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.03.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dick Ettema, Fabian Bastin, John Polak, Olu Ashiru. 2007. Modelling the joint choice of activity timing and duration. Transportation Research Part A. 41 (2007) 827--841. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.03.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. James, Jixian Wang, Timing Utility of daily Activities and Its Impact on Travel, 1996, Transportation Research part A, Volume. 30, Issue. 3, pp. 189--206(1996)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Activity identification from GPS trajectories using spatial temporal POIs' attractiveness

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        LBSN '10: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks
        November 2010
        80 pages
        ISBN:9781450304344
        DOI:10.1145/1867699

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 November 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate8of15submissions,53%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader