skip to main content
10.1145/1868914.1868966acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sustainable energy practices at work: understanding the role of workers in energy conservation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy conservation has become a very relevant social issue. There is a growing body of knowledge in the literature focused on supporting consumers in reducing their personal carbon footprint in their domestic context. In the workplace, however, most of the research focuses on optimizing formalized production processes and investing in energy efficient equipment. This leaves the question open of the role of workers in energy conservation. To explore this question, and overcome this bias, we conducted a series of participatory action research studies in which we introduced new smart metering technologies in a large organization and observed their contribution in supporting sustainable energy practices at work. In the paper we discuss the opportunity and risks posed by using this technology to make energy practices more transparent.

References

  1. Argyris, C.: Organizational learning and management information systems. ACM SIGMIS Database 13(2--3), pp. 3--11 (1982). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Betz, M., Schwartz, T.: Soziale Dimensionen von Smart Metering am Arbeitsplatz. In: Schumann, M., Kolbe, L. M., Breitner, M. H., and Frerichs, A.(eds.) In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010. pp. 341--352, Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blevis, E.: Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carney, S.: Brecht and critical theory: Dialictics and contemporary Aesthetics. Taylor & Francis 2006,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalmers, M.: A Historical View of Context. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13(3), (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chetty, M., Brush, A. B., Meyers, B. R., Johns, P.: It's not easy being green: understanding home computer power management. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. pp. 1033--1042, ACM, New York, NY (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chetty, M., Tran, D., Grinter, R. E.: Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home. In: UbiComp '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. pp. 242--251, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Darby, S.: Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting. pp. 685--696, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2001).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Darby, S.: The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays., 2006, p. 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., Brynjarsdóttir, H.: Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10. p. 1975, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ehn, P.: Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. (1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fogg, B. J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies). (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Foth, M., Paulos, E., Satchell, C., Dourish, P.: Pervasive Computing and Environmental Sustainability:. Two Conference Workshops. IEEE, Pervasive Computing 8(1), pp. 78--81 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hall, A.: Tätigkeiten und berufliche Anforderungen in wissensintensiven Berufen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 2007, p. 46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kant, I.: An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? St. Petersburg (1784).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelle, U.: Sociological Explanations between Micro and Macro and the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(1), (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mankoff, J. C., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S. R., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff, A., Sengers, P.: Environmental sustainability and interaction. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Murugesan, S.: Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices. IT Professional 10(1), pp. 24--33 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nett, B., Meurer, J., Stevens, G.: Knowledge Management-in-action in an EUD-oriented Software Enterprise BT - Proc of. Knowledge Management In Action (KMIA'08). Springer, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nett, B., Stevens, G.: Business Ethnography - Aktionsforschung als Beitrag zu einer reflexiven Technikgestaltung (Business Ethnography - Action research as a contribution to a reflective technique development). Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pettersen, I. N., Boks, C.: The ethics in balancing control and freedom when engineering solutions for sustainable behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 1(4), pp. 287--297 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rohde, M.: Integrated Organization and Technology Development (OTD) and the Impact of Socio-Cultural Concepts - A CSCW Perspective., 2007, p. 259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sellen, A. J., Fogg, A., Aitken, M., Hodges, S., Rother, C., Wood, K.: Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B., van Den Burg, M. T.: Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16(3), pp. 235--246 (1996).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. dena: Hemmnisse für Energieeffizienz in Unternehmen, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sustainable energy practices at work: understanding the role of workers in energy conservation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries
      October 2010
      889 pages
      ISBN:9781605589343
      DOI:10.1145/1868914

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader