skip to main content
10.1145/1869983.1869985acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design and evaluation of a versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless

Published:03 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present A-MAC, a receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless networks that supports several services under a unified architecture, and does so more efficiently and scalably than prior approaches. A-MAC's versatility stems from layering unicast, broadcast, wakeup, pollcast, and discovery above a single, flexible synchronization primitive. A-MAC's efficiency stems from optimizing this primitive and with it the most consequential decision that a low-power link makes: whether to stay awake or go to sleep after probing the channel. Today's receiver-initiated protocols require more time and energy to make this decision, and they exhibit worse judgment as well, leading to many false positives and negatives, and lower packet delivery ratios. A-MAC begins to make this decision quickly, and decides more conclusively and correctly in both the negative and affirmative. A-MAC's scalability comes from reserving one channel for the initial handshake and different channels for data transfer. Our results show that: (i) a unified implementation is possible; (ii) A-MAC's idle listening power increases by just 1.12x under interference, compared to 17.3x for LPL and 54.7x for RI-MAC; (iii) A-MAC offers high single-hop delivery ratios, even with multiple contending senders; (iv) network wakeup is faster and far more channel efficient than LPL; and (v) collection routing performance exceeds the state-of-the-art.

References

  1. J. Arnbak and W. van Blitterswijk. Capacity of slotted ALOHA in rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 5(2):261--269, Feb 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB). ARIB STD-T67: Telemeter, Telecontrol, and Data Transmission Radio Equipment for Specified Low-Power Radio Station, Version 1.1. ARIB STD-T67, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Atmel. AT86RF230. Available at: http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=3941.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. A. Boano, T. Voigt, N. Tsiftes, L. Mottola, K. Roemer, and M. A. Zuniga. Making sensornet MAC protocols robust against interference. In EWSN'10: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, Feb. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Buettner, G. Yee, E. Anderson, and R. Han. X-MAC: A short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Sensys'06: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Nov. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. P. Connors and G. J. Pottie. Response Initiated Multiple Access (RIMA), a Medium Access Control protocol for satellite channels. In GLOBECOM'00: Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Crossbow. Wireless Module - IRIS 2.4GHz. Available at: http://www.xbow.com/Products/productdetails.aspx?sid=264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Degesys, I. Rose, A. Patel, and R. Nagpal. DESYNC: self-organizing desynchronization and tdma on wireless sensor networks. In IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 11--20, Apr. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Demirbas, O. Soysal, and M. Hussain. A singlehop collaborative feedback primitive for wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM'08: Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Computer Communications, Apr. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Dutta, D. Saha, D. Grunwald, and D. Sicker. SMACK: a SMart ACKnowledgment scheme for broadcast messages in wireless networks. In SIGCOMM'09: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Data Communication, pages 15--26, Aug. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Dutta and D. Culler. Practical asynchronous neighbor discovery and rendezvous for mobile sensing applications. In SenSys '08: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 71--84, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Dutta, D. Culler, and S. Shenker. Procrastination Might Lead to a Longer and More Useful Life. In HotNets-VI: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, Nov. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Dutta, R. Musǎloiu-E., I. Stoica, and A. Terzis. Wireless ACK collisions not considered harmful. In HotNets-VII: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, Oct. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Dutta, J. Taneja, J. Jeong, X. Jiang, and D. E. Culler. A building block approach to sensornet systems. In SenSys'08: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 267--280, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. El-Hoiydi and J.-D. Decotignie. Low power downlink MAC protocols for infrastructure wireless sensor networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 10(5):675--690, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Fonseca, P. Dutta, P. Levis, and I. Stoica. Quanto: Tracking energy in networked embedded systems. In OSDI'08: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pages 323--338, Dec. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves and A. Tzamaloukas. Reversing the collision-avoidance handshake in wireless networks. In MobiCom '99: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 120--131, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. O. Gnawali, R. Fonseca, K. Jamieson, D. Moss, and P. Levis. Collection Tree Protocol. In SenSys'09: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 1--14, Nov. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. A. Gronomeyer and A. L. McBride. MSK and offset QPSK modulation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 24(8), 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Hill and D. Culler. Mica: A Wireless Platform for Deeply Embedded Networks. IEEE Micro, 22(6):12--24, Nov. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, and K. Pister. System architecture directions for network sensors. In ASPLOS-IX: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Nov. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. W. Hui and D. E. Culler. IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks. In SenSys'08: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 15--28, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. IEEE Standard for Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks. Specific requirements -- Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennic. Wireless Microcontrollers: JN5121 and JN513x. Available at http://www.jennic.com/products/, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. C.-J. M. Liang, R. Musaloiu-E, and A. Terzis. Typhoon: A reliable data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. In EWSN'08: Proccedings of the 5th European Conference on Sensor Networks, Jan. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. Lu and K. Whitehouse. Flash flooding: Exploiting the capture effect for rapid flooding in wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM'09: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Computer Communications, Apr. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. Moss. Personal communications, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. R. Musǎloiu-E., C.-J. Liang, and A. Terzis. Koala: Ultra-low power data retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In IPSN'08: Proceedings of the 7th Intl. Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Apr. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Pasupathy. Minimum Shift Keying: A spectrally efficient modulation. IEEE Communications Magazine, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Polastre, J. Hill, and D. Culler. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Sensys'04: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Nov. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and D. Culler. Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In IPSN'05: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Apr. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Y. Sun, O. Gurewitz, S. Du, L. Tang, and D. B. Johnson. ADB: an efficient multihop broadcast protocol based on asynchronous duty-cycling in wireless sensor networks. In Sensys'09: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 43--56, Nov. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Y. Sun, O. Gurewitz, and D. B. Johnson. RI-MAC: a receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In SenSys'08: Proceedings of the 6th th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 1--14, Nov. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Texas Instruments. CC2420: 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver. Available at http://www.chipcon.com/files/CC2420_Data_Sheet_1_3.pdf, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Texas Instruments. CC2430: System-on-Chip Solution for 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee. Available at http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cc2430, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Texas Instruments. CC2520: Second generation 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver. Available at http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cc2520, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. T. van Dam and K. Langendoen. An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In SenSys'03: Proceedings of the 1st Intl. Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 171--180, Nov. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM'02: Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computer Communications, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. W. Ye, F. Silva, and J. Heidemann. Ultra-low duty cycle MAC with scheduled channel polling. In SenSys '06: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 321--334, Nov. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design and evaluation of a versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SenSys '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
      November 2010
      461 pages
      ISBN:9781450303446
      DOI:10.1145/1869983

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 November 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader