skip to main content
10.1145/1878803.1878819acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing auditory cues to enhance spoken mathematics for visually impaired users

Published:25 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visual mathematic notation provides a succinct and unambiguous description of the structure of mathematical formulae in a manner that is difficult to replicate through the linear channels of synthesized speech and Braille. It is proposed that the use of auditory cues can enhance accessibility to mathematical material and reduce common ambiguities encountered through spoken mathematics. However, the use of additional complex hierarchies of non-speech sounds to represent the structure and scope of equations may be cognitively demanding to process. This can detract from the users' understanding of the mathematical content. In this paper, a new system is presented, which uses a mixture of non-speech auditory cues, modified speech (spearcons) and binaural spatialization to disambiguate the structure of mathematical formulae. A design study, involving an online survey with 56 users, was undertaken to evaluate an existing set of auditory cues and to brainstorm alternative ideas and solutions from users before implementing modified designs and conducting a separate controlled evaluation. It is proposed that by involving a wide number of users in the creative design process, intuitive auditory cues will be implemented with the potential to enhance spoken mathematics for visually impaired users.

References

  1. Archambault, D., Stöger, B., Batusic, M., Fahrengruber, C., and Miesenberger, K. 2007. A software model to support collaborative mathematical work between braille and sighted users. Proceedings of ASSETS 2007 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 115--122, Tempe, AZ, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bates, E., Fitzpatrick, D. 2010. Spoken Mathematics using Prosody, Earcons and Spearcons, Proceedings of ICCHP, the 12th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, July 14--16, Vienna, Austria. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Begault, D. R. & Erbe, T. R.: 1993. Multi-channel spatial auditory display for speech communications. Audio Engineering Society 95th Convention, Preprint No. 3707.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewster S. A. Using non-speech sound to overcome information overload. Displays 1997; 17: 179--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewster, S. A., Wright, P. C. & Edwards, A. D. N. 1995. Experimentally derived guidelines for the creation of earcons. Adjunct Proceedings of HCI'95, Huddersfield, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crispien, K. and Petrie, H. 1993. Providing Access to Graphical-Based User Interfaces for Blind People: Using Multimedia System Based on Spatial Audio Representation. 95th AES Convention, J. Audio Eng. Soc, (Abstracts), vol. 41, pp. 1060.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, A. D. N. 1997. Using sounds to convey complex information. in A. Schick and M. Klatte (ed.), Contributions to Psychological Acoustics: Results of the Seventh Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, Oldenburg, pp. 341--358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzpatrick, D. 2006. Mathematics: how and what to speak. In Proceedings of ICCHP, International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Springer Verlag, pp. 1199--1206 . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaver, W. W. (1986). Auditory icons: Using sound in computer interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 167--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gellenbeck, E., Stefik, A. 2009. Evaluating Prosodic Cues as a Means to Disambiguate Algebraic Expressions: An Empirical Study, Proceedings of ASSETS 2009, the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility October 26--28, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goose, S. and Möller, C. 1999. A 3D Audio Only Interactive Web Browser: Using Spatialization to Convey Hypermedia Document Structure. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 363--371, Orlando, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Harling, P. A., Stevens, R. and Edwards, A. 1995. Mathgrasp: The design of an algebra manipulation tool for visually disabled mathematicians using spatial-sound and manual gestures. HCI Group, University of York, UK. Available: ftp://ftp.cs.york.ac.uk/pub/alistair/publications/ps/mathgrasp.psGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Karshmer, A. I., Farsi, D. 2007. Access to Mathematics by Blind Students: A Global Problem, In Proceedings of the WMSCI 2007 Conference, Orlando, Florida.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Karshmer, A. I., Gupta, G., Pontelli, E., Miesenberger, K., Ammalai, N., Gopal, D., Batusic, M., Stöger, B., Palmer, B., Guo, H.-F. 2004. UMA: a system for universal mathematics accessibility, Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, October 18--20, Atlanta, GA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Moos, A. and Trouvain, J. 2007. Comprehension of ultra-fast speech - blind vs. "normally hearing" persons. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pages 677--680.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mynatt, E. 1997. Transforming graphical interfaces into auditory interfaces for blind users. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(1), 7--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nemeth, A.: Mathspeak. Available: http://people.rit.edu/easi/easisem/talkmath.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ohio State University, Web Accessibility Initiative, A Survey of Survey Tools, Available: http://wac.osu.edu/workshops/survey_of_surveys/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pirhonen, A., Murphy, E. 2008. Designing for the Unexpected: The role of creative group work for emerging interaction design paradigms. Journal of Visual Communication: Special Issue on Haptic Interactions, 7(3) 331--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Raman, T. V. 1994. Audio Systems for Technical Reading. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ny, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stevens, R. D. & Edwards, A. D. N. 1996. An approach to the evaluation of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 1996 Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies; April 11--12; Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Stevens, R. D., Principles for the Design of Auditory Interfaces to Present Complex Information to Blind Computer Users. 1996. PhD Thesis, University of York, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Walker, B., Nance, A. and Lindsay, J.: Spearcons. 2006. Speech-based Earcons Improve Navigation Performance in Auditory Menus. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display, London, UK, June 20-23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing auditory cues to enhance spoken mathematics for visually impaired users

              Recommendations

              Reviews

              Jeanine M. Meyer

              Murphy et al. describe a system for communicating mathematical equations to visually impaired users using speech, augmented speech, and nonspeech sounds. Their design survey evaluates the system and investigates ideas for improvement. The paper does not include a literature review, but it does include many references. The techniques, evoking the Victor Borge comedy routine on punctuation, include spearcons, which are compressed speech, and earcons, which include beeps and upward and downward glissandos for bracketing; stereo effects are used in combination with other techniques. The system is built using Acapela Group speech synthesis (http://www.acapela-group.com/) and the irrKlang three-dimensional (3D) sound system (http://www.ambiera.com/irrklang/). The techniques are described in more detail in another paper [1]; this paper focuses on the survey. The survey involved 35 sighted users and 21 visually impaired users from three countries. The study measured how accurately the users interpreted the features using different techniques. Accuracy was judged using multiple-choice answers-sighted users were presented with visual equations; visually impaired users were presented with "the equivalent verbose lexical version based on Nemeth Mathspeak." It appears as though visually impaired users had twice the burden of sighted users, but there were situations in which their average performance was better. The study also solicited qualitative responses on what techniques worked best. As the paper notes, "a sound example of this equation is also available at http://mcg.computing.dcu.ie/amexamples"; it is worth trying. This study is a work in progress by an able team. The paper closes by noting that a usable auditory math system would serve sighted users in mobile contexts and other circumstances of situational blindness. Online Computing Reviews Service

              Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

              Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                ASSETS '10: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
                October 2010
                346 pages
                ISBN:9781605588810
                DOI:10.1145/1878803

                Copyright © 2010 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 25 October 2010

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader