Michael Muller
N. Sadat Shami
David R. Millen
ABSTRACT
Most knowledge repositories focus on the role of knowledge-creators. In this paper, by contrast, we examined the work of Lurkers in an enterprise file-sharing service, and we compared their lurking behaviors to the lurking behaviors of users who uploaded files (Uploaders), and users who contributed metadata about files (Contributors). For comparability, we restricted our analyses to the consuming behaviors that are common to the three roles (Uploaders, Contributors, and Lurkers). Independent principal components analysis showed highly similar seven-factor solutions of lurking activities across all three roles, although the relative emphases of those factors varied across roles. Uploaders tended to view and download more groups of files, showed less emphasis on searching for files, and tended to work directly with the file-sharing application, unmediated by external applications. Contributors showed the opposite pattern: more emphasis on searching and responding to recommendations from other users, often via a form of remote access. Lurkers' lurking behaviors were less intense, and showed little difference in emphases among the lurker factors. We use these results, and the published research literature, to motivate a research agenda for lurkers in social media.
- Alcoff, L. M., 'The problem of speaking for others,' Cultural Critique (winter 1991-92), 5--32.Google Scholar
- Antin, J., & Cheshire, C., 'Readers are not free-riders: Reading as a form of participation on Wikipedia,' Proc CSCW 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bishop, J., 'Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human-computer interaction,' Computers in Human Behavior, vol 23, no 4, 1881--1893, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogdan, C., & Bowers, J., 'Tuning in: Challenging design for communities through a field study of radio amateurs,' Proc Communities & Technologies 2007, Springer, 439--461.Google Scholar
- Chi, E. H., 'Information seeking can be social,' Computer, vol 42, no 3, 42--46, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Curien, N., Fauchart, E., Laffond, G. & Moreau, F. (2006). 'Online consumer communities: Escaping the tragedy of the digital commons.' In E. Brousseau (Ed)., Internet and Digital Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
- DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W. G., Dugan, C. Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). 'Motivations for social networking at work.' Proc CSCW 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). 'Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities.' In S. Herring (ed.), Computer-Mediated Communications: Linguistic, Social, & Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins (1996), 109--128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Korth, A., Hirsch, B., & Plumbaum, T., 'A trilogy of webs for machines,' http://www.dai-labor.de/index.php?id=1034&pubID=399, 2008.Google Scholar
- Lantham, R. A., The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information, University of Chicago Press, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E., Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, J. (2003). 'An end-user perspective on file-sharing systems.' Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, no. 2, February 2003, 49--53. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, C., & Bernoff, J., Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies, Harvard Business School Press, 2008.Google Scholar
- McDermott, M., 'How to measure the success of your web app,' http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/webapps/how-to-measure-the-success-of-your-web-app.Google Scholar
- Muller, M. J., 'Ethnocritical heuristics for reflecting on work with users and other interested parties.' In Kyng, M., & Mathiessen, L., (eds.), Computers and design in context, Cambridge MA USA: MIT Press, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muller, M., Millen, D. R., & Feinberg, J., 'Information curators in an enterprise file-sharing service.' Proc. ECSCW 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muller, M., Millen, D. R., & Feinberg, J., 'Patterns of usage in an enterprise file-sharing service: Publicizing, discovering, and telling the news,' Proc CHI 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J., 'Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute,' http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html, 2006.Google Scholar
- Nonnecke, B., Andrews, A., & Preece, J., 'Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes, and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research vol 6, no 1, 7--20, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). 'Lurker demographics: Counting the silent.' Proc CHI 2000, ACM Press, Den Hague, Nederlands, April 2000, 73--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Panciera, K., Priedhorsky, R., Erickson, T., & Terveen, L., 'Lurking? Cyclopaths? A quantitative lifecycle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki,' Proc CHI 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pirolli, P., Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. New York: Oxford, 2007. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Porter, J., Designing for the social web, New Riders Press, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., 'The top 5 reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone,' Comp. Human Beh., vol 2, no 1, 2004.Google Scholar
- Preece J. and Shneiderman B., 'The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation,' AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, vol 1, no 1, 13--32, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S. K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J., 'Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia,' Proc GROUP 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rader, E., 'The effect of audience design on labeling, organizing, and finding shared files,' Proc CHI 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rader, E. 'Yours, mine and (not) ours: Social influences on group information repositories.' Proc CHI 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., & Soroka, V., 'De-Lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital.' Proc. HICSS 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schultz, N., & Beach, B., 'From lurkers to posters,' Australian National Training Authority, http://pre2005.flexiblelearning.net.au/resources/lurkerstoposters.pdf, 2004.Google Scholar
- Soroka, V., & Rafaeli, S., 'Invisible participants: Now cultural capital relates to lurking behavior,' Proc WWW 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., & Yamasaki, N., 'The active lurker: Influence of an in-house online commu-nity on its outside environment.' Proc GROUP 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Voida, S., Edwards, W. K., Newman, M. W., Grinter, R. E., & Ducheneaut, N. 'Share and share alike: Exploring the user interface affordances of file sharing.' Proc CHI 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whalen, T., Toms, E. G., & Blustein, J. (2008). 'Information displays for managing shared files.' Proc CHIMIT'08, ACM Press, San Diego, CA, USA, November 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- We are all lurkers: consuming behaviors among authors and readers in an enterprise file-sharing service
Recommendations
Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review
In internet culture, lurkers are a special group of website users who regularly login to online communities but seldom post. This study aims to provide an overall understanding of lurkers by explaining the definition of lurkers, discussing the reasons ...
The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment
GROUP '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkIn this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method of classifying participants including lurkers based on two ...
The active lurker: a new viewpoint for evaluating the influence of an in-house online community
In this study, we focus on participants called lurkers, who do not post any messages in an online community such as interactive mailing lists and bulletin board systems. We propose a method of classifying participants including lurkers based on two ...
Comments