skip to main content
10.1145/1900441.1900461acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project

Published:29 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a study of user gains from their participation in a participatory design (PD) project at Danish primary schools. We explore user experiences and reported gains from the project in relation to the multiple aims of PD, based on a series of interviews with pupils, teachers, administrators, and consultants, conducted approximately three years after the end of the project. In particular, we reflect on how the PD initiatives were sustained after the project had ended. We propose that not only are ideas and initiatives disseminated directly within the organization, but also through networked relationships among people, stretching across organizations and project groups. Moreover, we demonstrate how users' gains related to their acting within these networks. These results suggest a heightened focus on the indirect and distributed channels through which the long-term impact of PD emerges.

References

  1. Balka, E. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda, Proc. of PDC 2006, 134--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bardram, J. E., Hansen, T. R., and Soegaard, M. AwareMedia: a shared interactive display supporting social, temporal, and spatial awareness in surgery, Proc. of CSCW 2006, 109--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude, MIS Quarterly, 1994, 18(1): 59--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beck, E. E. P for political -- participation is not enough, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2002, 14: 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. (Eds.) Computers and democracy -- a Scandinavian challenge, Avebury Gower Publishing, Aldershot, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossen, C. Participation, power, critique: constructing a standard for electronic patient records, Proc. of PDC 2006, 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bratteteig, T. Mutual learning. Enabling cooperation in systems design. In: K. Bras and E. Monteiro, Editors, Proceedings of IRIS 1997, 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodersen, C. Dindler, C., Iversen, O. S. Staging Imaginative Places for Participatory Prototyping. Journal of CoDesign, 2008, 4(1): 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bødker, S. 1996. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development, Human-Computer Interaction, 11: 215--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bødker, S. and Grønbæk, K. Users and designers in mutual activity: an analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In: Y. Engeström and D. Middleton, Editors, Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996), 130--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, J. M., Chin, G., Rosson, M. B., and Neale, D. C. The development of cooperation: five years of participatory design in the virtual school. Proc. of DIS 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Clement, A. and Besselaar, P. A retrospective look at PD projects, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 1993, 36(4): 29--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ehn, P. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Falköping, Sweden, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ehn, P. Participation in design things, Proc. of PDC 2008, 92--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Flick, U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publishing, London, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Flyvbjerg, B. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 2006, 12(2): 219--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (Eds.), Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing, Hillsdale (NJ), 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Grudin, J. and Pruit, J. Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. Proc. of PDC 2002, 144--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gärtner, J. and Wagner, I. Mapping Actors and Agendas: Political Frameworks of Systems Design and Participation. Human-Computer Interaction, 1996, 11: 187--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Voss, A., Büscher, M., Rouncefield, M., and Rouchy, P. Co-realisation. Towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2002, 14 (2): 9--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Iversen, O. S. Participatory Design beyond Work Practices - Designing with Children, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Iversen, O. S. & Brodersen, C. Building BRIDGE between children and users: a socio-cultural approach to child-computer interaction, Cognition, Technology, Work, 2007, 10: 83--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kensing, F., Simonsen, J. and Bødker, K. MUST -- A method for participatory design, Proc. of PDC 1996, 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kensing, F. and Bomberg, J. Participatory design: Issues and Concerns, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1998, 3(4): 167--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kvale, S. InterViews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA). 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mambrey, P., Mark, G., and Pankoke-Babatz, U. User Advocacy in Participatory Design: Designers' Experiences with a New Communication Channel. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1998, 7(3--4): 291--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Merkel, C. B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C. H., Lee, R., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Participatory design in community computing contexts: Tales from the field, Proc. of PDC 2004, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (Eds.) Participatory Design-Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (NJ). 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Simonsen, J. and Hertzum, M. Participatory Design and the Challenges of Large-Scale Systems: Extending the Iterative PD Approach, Proc. of PDC 2008, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Suchman, L. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2002, 1s4(3): 91--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Vergvall-Kåreborn, B. and Ståhlbrost, A. Participatory Design -- one step back or two steps forward? Proc. of PDC 2008, 102--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wagner, I. A web of fuzzy problems: confronting the ethical issues. Communications of the ACM, 1993 36(6): 94--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference
    November 2010
    314 pages
    ISBN:9781450301312
    DOI:10.1145/1900441

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader