skip to main content
10.1145/191029.191064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

CSI closed lab vs. open lab experiment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 March 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommendations of the ACM/IEEE Joint Curriculum Task Force on the Core of Computer Science and the dissatisfaction with the poor performance of too many CS1 students at Middle Tennessee State University combined to motivate the Computer Science Department to compare the use of closed labs and open labs. A controlled experiment was conducted in the Fall 1992 and Spring 1993 semester of CS1 classes. Some of these classes were chosen for closed lab and others for open lab experiences. ANOVAs of various comparison groups consistently showed significant differences on comprehensive CS1 exams in favor of the students in closed labs.

References

  1. 1.Denning, Peter J., et al. "Report- Computing as a Discipline." Communications of the ACM 32, no. 1 (1989): 9-23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Baldwin, Doug and Johannes A. G. M. Koomen. "Using Scientific Experiments in Early Computer Science Laboratories." SIGCSE Bulletin 24, no. 1 (1992): 102-106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Houghton, Raymond C., Jr. and Robert O. Jarman. "A Closed Lab for Introductory Computer Science Courses." The Journal of Computing in Small Colleges 8, no. 3 (1993): 145-152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Lang, Joseph E. and Barbara A. Smith. "Scheduled Supervised Laboratories in CS 1" A Comparative Analysis." SIGCSE Bulletin 25, no.1 (1993): 185-188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Roberge, James and Candice Suriano. "Embedding Laboratories within the Computer Science Curriculum." SIGCSE Bulletin 23, no. 1 (1991): 6-10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Schmidt, Kathy. "Closed Laboratories in an Entrylevel C Programming Course." The journal of Computing in Small Colleges 8, no. 3 (1993): 138-144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Burton, Debm. "Teaching Computer Science with Closed Laboratories." Computer Science Syllabus, Sept-Oct, no. 3 (1992): 8-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Joyce, Daniel T. "A Virtual Lab to Accompany CS 1 and CS2." SIGCSE Bulletin 22, no. 1 (1990): 40-43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.McCracken, Daniel D. "Three 'Lab Assignments' for an Algorithms Course." SIGCSE Bulletin 21, no. 2 (1989): 61-64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Fowler, George C. and Louis W. Glorfeld. "Predicting Aptitude in Introductory Computing: A Classification Model." AEDS Journal 14 (1981): 108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.Taylor, Harriet G. and Luegina C. Mounfield. "The Effect of High School Computer Science, Gender, and Work on Success in College Computer Science." SIGCSE Bulletin 21, no. 1 (1989): 195-198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CSI closed lab vs. open lab experiment

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '94: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education
          March 1994
          414 pages
          ISBN:0897916468
          DOI:10.1145/191029

          Copyright © 1994 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 March 1994

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE Virtual 2024

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader