J. D. Chase
- 1.J. D. Gould & C. Lewis, Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think, Commun. ACM 28, 300-311 (1985). Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.H.R. Hartson, D. Hix, Toward Empirically Derived Methodologies and Tools for Human-Computer Interface Development, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 31,477-494 (1989). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.M.B. Rosson, S. Maass & W. A. Kellogg, Designing for Designers: An Analysis of Design Practice in the Real World, CHI+GI Conference on Human Factor in Computing Systems (ACM, New York, 1987), 137-142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.D. Hix & H. R. Hartson, Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product and Process (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1993). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.H.R. Hartson, A. C. Siochi, D. Hix, The UAN: A User-Oriented Representation for Direct Manipulation Interface Designs, ACM Trans. on Info. Sys. 8, 181- 203 (1990). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.S.K. Card, T. P. Moran, A. Newell, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N J, 1983). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.T.P. Moran, The Command Language Grammar: A Representation for the User Interface of Interactive Computer Systems, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 15, 3-51 (1981).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8.S.K. Card, T. P. Moran, The Keystroke-Level Model for User Performance Time with Interactive Systems, Commun. ACM 23, 396-410 (1980). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.S.J. Payne, T. R. G. Green, Task-Action Grammars: A Model of the Mental Representation of Task Languages, Human-Computer Interaction 2, 03-133 (1986).Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.P. Reisner, Formal Grammar and Human Factors Design of an Interactive Graphics System, IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. SE-7, 229-240 (1981).Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.D. Kieras, P. G. Poison, An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 22, 365-394 (1985).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12.J.M. Carroll, W. A. Kellogg, M. B. Rosson, in Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human- Computer Interface J. M. Carroll, Ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991) 74-102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.T. Simon, Analysing the Scope of Cognitive Models in Human-Computer Interaction" A Trade-Off Approach, D. M. Jones and J. R. Winder, Ed., People and computers IV: The Fourth Conference of the British Computer Society Human-Computer Interaction Specialist Group University of Manchester, (1988), Vol. 4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.T.W. Bleser, Dissertation, An Input Device Model of Interactive Systems Design, George Washington University (1991). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.J. Mackinlay, S. K. Card, G. G. Robertson, A Semantic Analysis of the Design Space of Input Devices, Human Computer Interaction 5, (1990).Google Scholar
- 16.A. Kaplan, Conduct of Inquiry : Methodology For Behavioral Science (Chandler Pub. Co., 1964).Google Scholar
- 17.T.P. Moran, in Methodology of Interaction Guedj et al, Ed. (North-Holland Publishing Co., 1980) 293- 301.Google Scholar
- 18.R.J.K. Jacob, Using Formal Specification in the Design of Human-Computer Interfaces, Human Factors in Computer Systems (ACM Press, Gaithersburg, MD, 1982), 315-321. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.J. Cohen, A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37-46 (1960).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 20.J.L. Fleiss, Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters, Psychological Bulletin 76, 378-382 (1971).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 21.J.D. Chase, Dissertation, A Study to Derive An Empirical Definition of Behavioral Representation Techniques, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, to appear.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Development and evaluation of a taxonomical model of behavioral representation techniques
Recommendations
Usability evaluation in software development practice
INTERACT'11: Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part IVUsability evaluation is explored by comparing the effectiveness of using different evaluation methods and by studying how usability evaluation is conducted by practitioners.
The usage of usability techniques in scrum projects
HCSE'12: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Human-Centered Software EngineeringOver the past decades, usability techniques have been introduced into software development practices. At the same time many software development teams have started to use the agile development process --- Scrum --- to plan and organize their software ...
New approaches to usability evaluation in software development
New approaches to reduce obstacles.Obstacles: resource constraints, limited understanding and resistance.Barefoot evaluations: reduction of limited understanding and resistance.Crowdsourcing evaluations: reduction of resource requirements. Usability ...
Comments