skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957673acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism

Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent research has shown that anthropomorphism represents a means to facilitate HRI. Under which conditions do people anthropomorphize robots and other nonhuman agents? This research question was investigated in an experiment that manipulated participants' anticipation of a prospective human-robot interaction (HRI) with a robot whose behavior was characterized by either low or high predictability. We examined effects of these factors on perceptions of anthropomorphism and acceptance of the robot. Innovatively, the present research demonstrates that anticipation of HRI with an unpredictable agent increased anthropomorphic inferences and acceptance of the robot. Implications for future research on psychological determinants of anthropomorphism are discussed.

References

  1. Luczak, H., Rötting, M., and Schmidt, L. 2003. Let's talk: Anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices. Ergonomics, 46, 1361--1374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. 1996. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 1, 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Powers, A. and Kiesler, S. 2006. The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2006. 218--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Powers, A., Kramer, A. D. I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S-L., and Kiesler, S. 2005. Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 158--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eyssel, F. and Hegel, F. (accepted). (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of social robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F., Horstmann, G., and Wagner, C. 2010. Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), 681--686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Guthrie, S. 1993. Faces in the clouds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Epley, N., Waytz, A., and Cacioppo, J. T. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864--886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. White, R. W. 1959. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dennett, D. C. 1987. The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., and Cacioppo, J. T. 2008. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J. T., and Epley, N. 2010. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hegel, F. 2010. Gestalterisch-konstruktiver Entwurf eines sozialen Roboters {Design and concept of a social robot}. Der Andere Verlag, Tönning, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hegel, F., Eyssel, F., and Wrede, B. 2010. The social robot Flobi: Key Concepts of industrial design. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), 120--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Haslam, N., Bain, P., Loughnan, S., and Kashima, Y. 2008. Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 55--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2011
      526 pages
      ISBN:9781450305617
      DOI:10.1145/1957656

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader