skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957722acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Utilitarian vs. hedonic robots: role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitudes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examines the differential effects of hedonic vs. utilitarian robots, using a between-subjects experimental design, whereby 48 college students in Korea were randomly assigned to interact with either a Pleo (Dinosaur robot) or a Roomba (vacuum-cleaning robot). Results revealed that hedonic robot (HR) users perceived more enjoyment than utilitarian robot (UR) users, whereas UR users perceived more usefulness and ease-of-use than HR users. Users with high tendency for parasocial interaction (PSI) and high anthropomorphism had more positive attitudes towards robots than their counterparts with low levels of these traits. HR users with high anthropomorphism and PSI had the most positive attitudes than all other combinations of variables. These results indicate that individual differences play a significant moderating role on user attitudes toward hedonic and utilitarian robots. The results of this study suggest that robot developers and marketers should take seriously the labeling of robots as hedonic or utilitarian, and also consider users' individual differences in order to maximize benefits of human-robot interactions.

References

  1. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., DeLone, W., McLean, E., Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. and Chin, W. W. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. INFORM MANAGE, 27, 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. W. 1997. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS QUART, 21, 389--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Wu, Z. 2005. How individual differences influence technology usage behavior? Toward an integrated framework. J COMPUT INFORM SYST, (46:2), 52--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B. 1982. Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J MARKETING, 46, 92--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., Tscheligi, M. and Yoshida, E. 2009. Addressing user experience and societal impact in a user study with a humanoid robot. Citeseer, City.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. 1999.The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. INFORM MANAGE, 35, 237--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hoffner, C. 1996. Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. J BROADCAST ELECTRON, 40, 389--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jin, S.A. and Park, N. 2009. Parasocial Interaction with My Avatar. CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV. 12(6): 723--727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sundar, S. S. 2004. Loyalty to computer terminals: is it anthropomorphism or consistency? BIT, 23, 107--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS QUART, 13, 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, 22, 1111--1132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Cole, T. and Leets, L. 1999. Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. J SOC PERS RELAT, 16, 495--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T. and Kato, K. 2008. Prediction of Human Behavior in Human-Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots. IEEE T ROBOT, 24, 442--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Utilitarian vs. hedonic robots: role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitudes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
          March 2011
          526 pages
          ISBN:9781450305617
          DOI:10.1145/1957656

          Copyright © 2011 Authors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 March 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader