skip to main content
10.1145/1957656.1957785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features

Published:06 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent feasibility studies involving children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) interacting with socially assistive robots have shown that some children have positive reactions to robots, while others may have negative reactions. It is unlikely that children with ASD will enjoy any robot 100% of the time. It is therefore important to develop methods for detecting negative child behaviors in order to minimize distress and facilitate effective human-robot interaction. Our past work has shown that negative reactions can be readily identified and classified by a human observer from overhead video data alone, and that an automated position tracker combined with human-determined heuristics can differentiate between the two classes of reactions. This paper describes and validates an improved, non-heuristic method for determining if a child is interacting positively or negatively with a robot, based on Gaussian mixture models (GMM) and a naive-Bayes classifier of overhead camera observations. The approach achieves a 91.4% accuracy rate in classifying robot interaction, parent interaction, avoidance, and hiding against the wall behaviors and demonstrates that these classes are sufficient for distinguishing between positive and negative reactions of the child to the robot.

References

  1. Robotic tools for prosodic training for children with asd: A case study. In International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR), London, UK, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. O. Boiman and M. Irani. Detecting irregularities in images and in video. International Journal of Computer Vision, 74(1):17--31, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Chan, A. Hoogs, J. Schmiederer, and M. Petersen. Detecting rare events in video using semantic primitives with HMM. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), volume 4, pages 150--154, Cambridge, England, UK, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Dautenhahn, I. Werry, J. Rae, P. Dickerson, P. Stribling, and B. Ogden. Robotic playmates: Analysing interactive competencies of children with autism playing with a mobile robot. In K. Dautenhahn, A. Bond, L. Canamero, and B. Edmonds, editors, Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots, pages 117--124. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Efros, A. Berg, G. Mori, and J. Malik. Recognizing action at a distance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 726--733, Nice, France, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Eng, K. Toh, A. Kam, J. Wang, and W. Yau. An automatic drowning detection surveillance system for challenging outdoor pool environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 532--539, Nice, France, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. J. Feil-Seifer and M. J. Matarić. Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In 11th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics 2008, volume 54, pages 201--210, Athens, Greece, Jul 2008. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. J. Feil-Seifer and M. J. Matarić. Using proxemics to evaluate human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 143--144, Osaka, Japan, Mar 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Geschwind, J. Sowinski, C. Lord, P. Iverson, L. Ducat, and S. Spence. The autism genetic resource exchange: A resource for the study of autism and related neuropsychiatric conditions. American Journal of Human Genetics, 69:461--463, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Kelley, A. Tavakkoli, C. King, M. Nicolescu, M. Nicolescu, and G. Bebis. Understanding human intentions via hidden markov models in autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Robot Interaction, pages 367--374, Amsterdam, Netherlands, March 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and Y. Yasuda. Children-robot interaction: a pilot study in autism therapy. Prog Brain Res, 164:385--400, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. Kozima, Y. Yasuda, and C. Nakagawa. Social interaction facilitated by a minimally-designed robot: Finding from longitudinal therapeutic practices for autistic children. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 599--604, August 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. C. Lord, S. Risi, L. Lambrecht, E. H. C. Jr., B. L. Leventhal, P. C. DiLavore, A. Pickles, and M. Rutter. The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3):205--223, Jun 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. C. Lord, M. Rutter, and A. L. Couteur. Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5):659--685, Oct 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Park and J. Aggarwal. Semantic-level understanding of human actions and interactions using event hierarchy. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12--12, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Ramanan and D. Forsyth. Automatic annotation of everyday movements. In S. Thrun, L. Saul, and B. Schölkopf, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, Cambridge, MA, 2004. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Boekhorst, and A. Billard. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2):105--120, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boekhorst, and C. Nehaniv. Behaviour delay and robot expressiveness in child-robot interactions: a user study on interaction kinesics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 17--24, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, March 2008. ACM New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Scassellati. Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. In IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), pages 585--590, Nashville, TN, Aug 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. G. Schwarz. Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2):461--464, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Sparrow, D. Balla, and D. Cicchetti. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Test Corp of Amer, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Xiang and S. Gong. Beyond tracking: Modelling activity and understanding behaviour. International Journal of Computer Vision, 67(1):21--51, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. H. Zhong, J. Shi, and M. Visontai. Detecting Unusual Activity in Video. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 819--826, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          HRI '11: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction
          March 2011
          526 pages
          ISBN:9781450305617
          DOI:10.1145/1957656

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 March 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader