skip to main content
10.1145/1958824.1958830acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work, we conducted a case study of a popular Chinese microblogging site, Sina-Weibo, to investigate how Chinese netizens used microblogging in response to a major disaster: the 2010 Yushu Earthquake. We combined multiple analysis methods in this case study, including content analysis of microblog messages, trend analysis of different topics, and an analysis of the information spreading process. This study helped us understand the roles played by microblogging systems in response to major disasters and enabled us to gain insight into how to harness the power of microblogging to facilitate disaster response. In addition, this work supplements existing works with an exploration of a non-Western socio-cultural system: how Chinese Internet users used microblogging in disaster response.

References

  1. Bailey, N. T. J. The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its Applications. Griffin, London, 2nd edition, (1975).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo A. Huberman, Daniel M. Romero, and Fang Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14, 1, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, D., Golder, S. & Lotan, G, Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. Proc. HICSS-43, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, K. P. (2010). Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Millon Follower Fallacy. Proc. ICWSM, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaser, M. California Wildfire Coverage by Local Media, Blogs, Twitter, Maps and More. PBS MediaShift. http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2007/10/the_listcalifornia_wildfire_co_1.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldenberg ,J., Libai, B., and Muller, E. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 12, 3, (2001), 211--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hagar, C. and Haythornthwaite, C. Crisis, Farming & Community. The Journal of Community Informatics, 1, 3, (2005), 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Honeycutt, C., and Herring, S. C., Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proc. HICCS-42, IEEE Press, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hughes, A. L., and Palen, L., Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. Proc. ISCRAM, (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jaeger, P. T., Langa, L. A., McClure, C. R. and Bertot, J. C., The 2004 and 2005 Gulf Coast Hurricanes: Evolving Roles and Lessons Learned for Public Libraries in Disaster Preparedness and Community Services. Public Library Quarterly, 25, 3/4, (2007), 199--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng. B. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proc. 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop. ACM, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kwak, H., Lee, C. Park, H., and Moon S., What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media? Proc. of the 19th WWW, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lerman, K.; Ghosh, R., Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks. Proc. International AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Leskovec, J.; Adamic, L., and Huberman, B. 2006. The dynamics of viral marketing. Proc. 7th Conf. on Electronic Commerce, (2006), 228--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Liben-Nowell, D., and Kleinberg, J., Tracing information flow on a globalscale using internet chain-letter data. PNAS, 105, 12, 4633--4638. (2008)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Moore, C., and Newman, M. E. J., Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. Physical Review E, 61, (2000), 5678--5682.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Qu, Y., P.F. Wu, and X. Wang. Online Community Response to Major Disaster: A Study of Tianya Forum in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake. Proc. HICCS, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S. & Huberman, B. A. (2010). Influence and Passivity in Social Media. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1653135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Shneiderman, B. and Preece, J. 911.gov: Community Response Grids. Science, 315, (2007), 944.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Starbird, K., & Palen, L. Pass It On: Retweeting in Mass Emergency. Proc. ISCRAM, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Starbird, K., Palen, L., Hughes, A. L., & Vieweg, S., Chatter on The Red: What Hazards Threat Reveals about the Social Life of Microblogged Information. Proc. CSCW (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., and Chi, Ed H. "Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network", Proc. IEEE Conf. on Social Computing (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sutton, J., Palen, L., and Shklovski, I. Backchannels on the Front Lines: Emergent Use of Social Media in the 2007 Southern California Fires. Proc. ISCRAM, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Torrey, C., Burke, M., Lee, M., Dey, A., Fussell, S. and Kiesler, S. Connected Giving: Ordinary People Coordinating Disaster Relief on the Internet. Proc. HICSS, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., and Palen, L., Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proc. CHI, (2010), 1079--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wu, F.; Huberman, B.; Adamic, L.; and Tyler, J., Information flow in social groups. Physica A, 337, (2004), 327--335Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Yang, J. & Counts, S. (2010). Predicting the Speed, Scale, and Range of Information Diffusion in Twitter. Proc. ICWSM, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Young, H. P., the Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks. In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Vol. III, ed. Lawrence E. Blume and Steven N. Durlauf, (2003), 267--82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '11: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
          March 2011
          764 pages
          ISBN:9781450305563
          DOI:10.1145/1958824

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 March 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader