skip to main content
10.1145/1959826.1959831acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The PhantomStation: towards funneling remote tactile feedback on interactive surfaces

Published:13 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the PhantomStation, a novel interface that communicates tactile feedback to remote parts of the user's body. Thus, touch input on interactive surfaces can be augmented with synchronous tactile sensations. With the objective to reduce the number of tactile actuators on the user's body, we use the psychophysical Phantom Sensation (PhS) [1]. This illusion occurs when two or more tactile stimuli are presented simultaneously to the skin. The location of the pseudo-tactile sensation can be changed by modulating intensity or interstimulus time interval. We compare three different actuator technologies to recreate the PhS. Furthermore, we discuss how remote tactile of this kind can improve interaction accuracy. We present our prototype and propose scenarios in conjunction with interactive surfaces.

References

  1. Alles, D. Information Transmission by Phantom Sensations. IEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems 11, 1 (1970), 85--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Benali-Khoudja, M., Hafez, M., Alexandre, J.M., and Kheddar, A. Tactile Interfaces: A State-of-the-Art Survey. International Symposium on Robotics, (2004), 721--726.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoggan, E., Brewster, S.A., and Johnston, J. Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens. Proceedings of CHI 2008, 1573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kaaresoja, T., Brown, L.M., and Linjama, J. Snap-Crackle-Pop: Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touch Screens. Proceedings of Eurohaptics 2006, 565--566.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kato, H., Hashimoto, Y., and Kajimoto, H. Basic Properties of Phantom Sensation for Practical Haptic Applications. LNCS, Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations 6191, (2010), 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Leung, R., MacLean, K., Bertelsen, M.B., and Saubhasik, M. Evaluation of Haptically Augmented Touchscreen GUI Elements under Cognitive Load. Proceedings of ICMI 2007, 374--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Marquardt, N., Nacenta, M., Young, J., Carpendale, S., Greenberg, S., and Sharlin, E. The Haptic Tabletop Puck. Proceedings of ITS 2009, 93--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Poupyrev, I., Nashida, T., Maruyama, S., Rekimoto, J., and Yamaji, Y. Lumen. Porceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rahal, L. and Cha, J. Continuous Tactile Perception for Vibrotactile Displays. Robotic and Sensors, (2009), 86--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The PhantomStation: towards funneling remote tactile feedback on interactive surfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AH '11: Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference
      March 2011
      169 pages
      ISBN:9781450304269
      DOI:10.1145/1959826

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader