skip to main content
10.1145/1962300.1962347acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Self-efficacy & stress in senior computer interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivation -- To gather an understanding about the relation between system complexity, self-efficacy and stress in senior computer interaction.

Research approach -- An empirical study was employed in which 30 seniors performed a number of tasks on a low and high complexity search system. Self-efficacy was manipulated by positive and negative performance feedback. Self-efficacy and perceived stress were both measured by self-reports.

Findings/Design -- The results revealed that stress plays a role in senior computer interaction. Negative performance feedback increases stress and decreases self-efficacy. Furthermore, it was found that positive performance feedback significantly increases seniors' self-efficacy during computer interaction. Moreover, a significant effect was found of self-efficacy on stress. Perceived stress increased with decreasing self-efficacy. Although system complexity significantly influenced self-efficacy, no relation was found between system complexity and stress.

Research limitations/Implications -- The findings can be used in the design of interaction devices for seniors. To increase self-efficacy and to decrease stress in senior computer interaction, it is advised to present seniors with positive performance feedback; negative performance feedback should rather be avoided for satisfying interaction.

Originality/Value -- The research contributes to the need of designers to target senior users by creating satisfying interaction for these groups.

Take away message -- To increase seniors' confidence with computers, i.e. to increase self-efficacy, it is vital to provide positive performance feedback and high accessibility. Furthermore, increasing self-efficacy reduces the stress experience of seniors during computer interaction.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bessière, K., Newhagen, J.E., Robinson, J.P., & Shneiderman, B. (2006). A model for computer frustration: the role of instrumental and dispositional factors on incident, session, and postsession frustration and mood. Computer in Human Behavior, 22, 941--961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hamborg, K.C., & Grief, S. (2003). New Technologies and Stress. In M.J. Schabracq, J.A.M. Winnubst & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 211). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hawkley, L.C., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2004). Stress and the aging immune system. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 18, 114--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hawthorn, D. (2000). Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers, 12, 507--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. IJsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., & Van den Hoven, E. (2006). Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene. In IJsselsteijn, De Kort, Midden, Eggen, & Van den Hoven (Eds.) First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being (pp. 1--5). Berlin: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. ISO 9241-11 (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McEwen, B., & Norton Lasley, E. (2002). The end of stress as we know it. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Morrell, R.W. (Ed.). (2002). Older Adults, Health Information and the World Wide Web. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nap, H.H., De Greef, H.P., & Bouwhuis, D.G. (2005). Access for all by cognitive engineering. Gerontechnology, 3, 259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nap, H.H. (2008). Stress in Senior Computer Interaction. Doctoral dissertation. The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Neerincx, M.A., Lindenberg, J., Rypkema, J.A. & Van Besouw, N.J.P. (2000). A practical cognitive theory of Web-navigation: Explaining age-related performance differences. CHI2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290--312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sobel, M.E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1986 (pp. 159--186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. UN (2008). World Population Prospects, The 2008 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Retrieved 26 May, 2010, http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2008/wpp2008_highlights.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ursin, H. & Eriksen, H.R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 567--592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wiedenfeld, S.A., O'Leary, A., Bandura, A., Brown, S., Levine, S., & Raska, K. (1990). Impact of Perceived Self-Efficacy in Coping With Stressors on Components of the Immune System. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1082--1094.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Xie, B. (2002). Older adults, computers and the Internet: Future directions. Gerontechnology, 2, 289--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Self-efficacy & stress in senior computer interaction

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ECCE '10: Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
            August 2010
            380 pages
            ISBN:9781605589466
            DOI:10.1145/1962300

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 August 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader