skip to main content
10.1145/1963405.1963428acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incentivizing high-quality user-generated content

Published:28 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

We model the economics of incentivizing high-quality user generated content (UGC), motivated by settings such as online review forums, question-answer sites, and comments on news articles and blogs. We provide a game-theoretic model within which to study the problem of incentivizing high quality UGC, in which contributors are strategic and motivated by exposure. Our model has the feature that both the quality of contributions as well as the extent of participation is determined endogenously in a free-entry Nash equilibrium.

The model predicts, as observed in practice, that if exposure is independent of quality, there will be a flood of low quality contributions in equilibrium. An ideal mechanism in this context would elicit both high quality and high participation in equilibrium, with near-optimal quality as the available attention diverges, and should be easily implementable in practice. We consider a very simple elimination mechanism, which subjects each contribution to rating by some number A of viewers, and eliminates any contributions that are not uniformly rated positively. We construct and analyze free-entry Nash equilibria for this mechanism, and show that A can be chosen to achieve quality that tends to optimal, along with diverging participation, as the number of viewers diverges.

References

  1. E. Friedman, P. Resnick, R. Sami, Manipulation-Resistant Reputation Systems, Algorithmic Game Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. Chen, S. Jain, D. Parkes, Designing Incentives for Online Question and Answer Forums, ACM EC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Jain, D. Parkes, The Role of Game Theory in Human Computation Systems (Position Paper), HCOMP 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Jain, D. Parkes, A Game-Theoretic Analysis of the ESP Game, Working Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Jøsang, R. Ismail, C. Boyd, A Survey of Trust and Reputation Systems for Online Service Provision, Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618--644, March 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Ling, G. Beenen, X. Wang, K. Chang, D. Frankowski, P. Resnick, R. Kraut, Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4), 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Rafaeli, Y. Ariel, Online Motivational Factors: Incentives for Participation and Contribution in Wikipedia, Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace, Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web
    March 2011
    840 pages
    ISBN:9781450306324
    DOI:10.1145/1963405

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 March 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader