skip to main content
article
Free Access

Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work

Published:01 April 1994Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The sometimes observed negative social effects of electronic communication technology are often attributed to the characteristics of the technology itself. Electronic mail, for instance, filters out personal and social cues and provides new capabilities not found in traditional media, and it has been argued that these factors have consequences such as “flaming” and depersonalization. Alternative theoretical perspectives on the impacts of information technology suggest that our ability to explain these outcomes might be enhanced by attending to users' intentional choices about how to use technology and to unpredictable technology usage patterns that emerge when users interact with the technology and each other. These alternative perspectives are examined in the context of an exploratory case study of a complex organization in which electronic mail was heavily used.

Users were found to select email deliberately when they wished to avoid unwanted social interactions. At the same time, they actively took steps to avoid negative outcomes, such as depersonalization of their relationships with subordinates. However, despite their well-intentioned efforts, some negative social effects did occur that cannot entirely be attributed to the technological characteristics of electronic communication. Instead, they appear to be ironic side effects of users' thoughtful efforts to use email effectively. These results suggest the value of according a prominent role in explanations of technology impacts to users' intended and unintended technology uses. The results also imply that negative social effects from using electronic communication technology may not prove easy to eradicate, despite technological developments such as multimedia integration, and despite efforts to train users in the best email “etiquette.”

References

  1. BARLEY, S. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation s of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Q. 31, 78-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CONTRACTOR, N., AND EISENBERG, E. 1990. Communications networks and new media in organizations. In Organizations and Communications Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Eds. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 143 172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CULNAN, M., AND M~KUS, M.L. 1987. Information technologies. In Handbook of Organtzational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, F. Jablin et al., Eds. Sage Publication~, Newbm~ Park, Calif., 420 448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. DAFT, R., AND LENGEL, R. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32, 5 (May) 554-571. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DAFT, R., AND LENGEL, R. 1984. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In Research ~n Organzzat~on Behavzor, vol. 6, L. Cummings and B. Staw, Eds. JAI Press, Homewood, Ill., 191-233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. DILLMAN, D. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. DOUGLAS, M. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, N.YGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. EISENBERG, E., AND PHILLIPS, S. 1991. Miscommunication m organizations. In Miscommumcation and Problematic Talk, N Coupland et al., Eds. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 244-258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. EL-SHINNAWY, M., AND MARKUS, M.L. 1992. Media richness theory and new electronic communication media: A study of voice mail and electronic mail. In Proceedings of the Internatwnal Conference on Information Systems (Dallas, Tex.), 91-105. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. EVELAND, J., AND BIKSON, T. 1988. Work group structures and computer support: A field experiment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperatwe Work (Portland, Ore.), 324 343. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. EVELAND, J., AND BiKSON, T. 1987. Evolving electronic communication networks: An empirical assessment. Off. Technol. People 3, 2(Aug.), 103-128. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. FELDMAN, M. 1987. Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Off. Technol. People 3, 83 101. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. FINHOLT, T., AND SPROULL, L. 1990. Electronic groups at work Organ~zatLon Sc~. 1, 1, 41-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. HOLLAN, J., AND STORNETTA, S. 1992. Beyond being there. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Human Interactzon (May), 119 125. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. JICK, T. 1983. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. In QualL- tative Methodology, J. Van Maanen, Ed. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 135 148Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. KERR, E., AND HILTZ, S. 1982. Computer-Medtated Commun~catzon Systems Academic Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. GESLER, S., SIEOEL, J., AND McGumE, T. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am. Psychol. 39 (Oct.), 1123 1134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. I~LING, a. 1991. Cooperation, coordination and control in computer supported work. Commun ACM 34, 4 (Dec.), 83 88. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. KLING, R. 1980. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Computing Surveys 12, 61-110 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. I~ING, R., AND SCACCHI, W. 1982. The web of computing: Computer technology as socml organization. In Advances Ln Computers, M Yowts, Ed. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. LEE, A 1991. Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Scl. 2, 4 (Nov.), 342-365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. LEE, A. 1989. A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. Manage Inf. Syst. Q. 13, 1 (Mar.), 33 50. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. LENGEL, R., AND DAFT, a. 1988. The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Acad. Manage. Executzve 2, 3, 225-232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. MARKUS, M L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. O~an~zation Scl. In press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. MARKUS, M.L. 1992. Asynchronous tools in small face-to-face groups. Inf. Technol. People 6, 1, 29-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. MARKUS, M.L. 1990. Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media. In Organlzatwns and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Eds. Sage Publications, Newbury Park~ Calif., 194-218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. MARKUS, M. L., AND ROBEY, D. 1988. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Manage Scl. 34, 5 (May), 583-598. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. MERTON, R., FISK, M., AND KENDALL, P. 1990. The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures (2nd Ed.). The Free Press, New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. MILES, M., AND HUBERMAN, A. 1984. Qualztatwe Data Analysls: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ORLIKOWSKI, W., AND BAROUDI, J. 1991. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, I (March), 1-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. ORLIKOWSKI, W., AND ROBEY, n. 1991. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inf. Syst. Res., 2, 2 (June), 143 169Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. PFEFFER, J. 1982. Organizations and Organizatwn Theory. Pitman, Marshfield, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. POOL, I. 1983. Forecasting the Telephone: A Retrospective Technology Assessment of the Telephone. Ablex, Norwood, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. POOL, I. (Ed.). 1978. The Social Impact of the Telephone. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. POOLE, M., AND DESANCTIS, G. 1990. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In Organizatwns and Communications Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Eds. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 173-193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. REDER, S., AND SCHWAB, R. 1990. The temporal structure of cooperative activity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Los Angeles, Calif.), 303-316. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. REDER, S., AND SCHWAB, R. 1989. The communicative economy of the workgroups: Multi-channel genres of communication. Off. Technol. People 4, 3 (June), 177-195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. R~CE, R. ET ~. 1984. The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. R~cE, R., AND LOVE, G. 1987. Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer mediated communication network. Commun. Res. 14, I (Feb.), 85-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. SHAPIRO, N., AND ANDERSON, R. 1985. Toward an ethics and etiquette for electronic mail. R-3283-NSF/RC. Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. SHORT, J., WmH~S, E., AND CHRISTm, B. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunicatwns. Wiley, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. SmBER, S. 1973. The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. Am. J. Sociology 78, 6 (May), 1335-1359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. SPROULL, L., AND I~ESLER, S. 1991. Connections: New Ways of Working ~n the Networked Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. SPROULL, L., AND KIESLER, S. 1986. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. 32, 11 (Nov.), 1492-1512. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. SPROULL, R. 1991. A lesson in electronic mail. In Connectwns: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organizatwn, L. Sproull and S. Kiesler, Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 177-184. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. STEINFIELD, C. 1986. Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In Communication Yearbook 9, M. McLaughlin, Ed., Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 777 804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. STEWART, D., AND SHAMDASANI, P. 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. YIN, R. 1989. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (revised edition). Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. ZUBOFF, S. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader