skip to main content
research-article

Coverage problems in sensor networks: A survey

Published:18 October 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Sensor networks, which consist of sensor nodes each capable of sensing environment and transmitting data, have lots of applications in battlefield surveillance, environmental monitoring, industrial diagnostics, etc. Coverage which is one of the most important performance metrics for sensor networks reflects how well a sensor field is monitored. Individual sensor coverage models are dependent on the sensing functions of different types of sensors, while network-wide sensing coverage is a collective performance measure for geographically distributed sensor nodes. This article surveys research progress made to address various coverage problems in sensor networks. We first provide discussions on sensor coverage models and design issues. The coverage problems in sensor networks can be classified into three categories according to the subject to be covered. We state the basic coverage problems in each category, and review representative solution approaches in the literature. We also provide comments and discussions on some extensions and variants of these basic coverage problems.

References

  1. Abrams, Z., Goel, A., and Plotkin, S. 2004. Set k-cover algorithms for energy efficient monitoring in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). 424--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adlakha, S. and Srivastava, M. 2003. Critical density thresholds for coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). Vol. 3. 1615--1620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Adriaens, J., Megerian, S., and Potkonjak, M. 2006. Optimal worst-case coverage of directional field-of-view sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd Annual Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 336--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed, N., Kanhere, S. S., and Jha, S. 2005. Probabilistic coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). 672--681. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ahuja, S. K., Kini, S., and Ramasubramanian, S. 2009. Bounds on coverage time and node density for multi-modality sensing. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. DOI:10.1016/j.adhoc.2009.01.006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ai, J. and Abouzeid, A. A. 2006. Coverage by directional sensors in randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. J. Combin. Optim. 11, 1, 21--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Comput. Netw. 39, 4, 393--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Altinel, K., Aras, N., Güney, E., and Ersoy, C. 2008. Binary integer programming formulation and heuristics for differentiated coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks. Elsevier Comput. Netw. 52, 12, 2419--2431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Aly, M., Pruhs, K., Znati, T., and Hunsaker, B. 2005. The coverage problem for myopic sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing. 964--968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Aurenhammer, F. 1991. Voronoi diagrams—A survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Comput. Surv. 23, 4, 345--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bai, H., Chen, X., Li, B., and Han, D. 2007. A location-free algorithm of energy-efficient connected coverage for high density wireless sensor networks. Discr. Event Dynam. Syst. 17, 1, 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bai, X., Kumar, S., Xuan, D., Yun, Z., and Lai, T. H. 2006. Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity. In Proceedings of the ACM 7th International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 131--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bai, X., Xuan, D., Yun, Z., Lai, T. H., and Jia, W. 2008a. Complete optimal deployment patterns for full-coverage and k-connectivity (k ≤ 6) wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM 9th International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 401--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bai, X., Yun, Z., Xuan, D., Lai, T. H., and Jia, W. 2008b. Deploying four-connectivity and full-coverage wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 27th Conference on Computer Communications (Infocom). 906--914.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Balister, P., Bollobas, B., Sarkar, A., and Kumar, S. 2007. Reliable density estimates for coverage and connectivity in thin strips of finite length. In Proceedings of the ACM 13th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 75--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Berman, P., Calinescu, G., Shah, C., and Zelikovsky, A. 2004. Power efficient monitoring management in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 2329--2334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Berman, P., Calinescu, G., Shah, C., and Zelikovsky, A. 2006. Efficient energy management in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing. Y. Pan and Y. Xiao, Eds., Nova Science Publisher.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Boukerche, A. and Fei, X. 2007. A voronoi approach for coverage protocols in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Globecom). 5190--5194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Boukerche, A., Fei, X., and Araujo, R. B. 2007. An optimal coverage-preserving scheme for wireless sensor networks based on local information exchange. Elsevier Comput. Comm. 30, 14-15, 2708--2720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Cai, Y., Lou, W., Li, M., and Li, X.-Y. 2007. Target-Oriented scheduling in directional sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Conference on Computer Communications. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cărbunar, B., Grama, A., Vitek, J., and Carbunar, O. 2006. Redundancy and coverage detection in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 2, 1, 94--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Cardei, M. and Du, D.-Z. 2005. Improving wireless sensor network lifetime through power aware organization. Wirel. Netw. 11, 3, 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Cardei, M., Thai, M. T., Li, Y., and Wu, W. 2005a. Energy-Efficient target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (InfoCom). 1976--1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Cardei, M. and Wu, J. 2004. Coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Handbook of Sensor Networks, M. Ilyas and I. Mahgoub, Eds. CRC Press, Chapter 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Cardei, M., Wu, J., Lu, M., and Pervaiz, M. O. 2005b. Maximum network lifetime in wireless sensor networks with adjustable sensing ranges. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob). 438--445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chakrabarty, K., Iyengar, S. S., Qi, H., and Cho, E. 2002. Grid coverage for surveillance and target location in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 51, 12, 1448--1453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Chen, A., Kumar, S., and Lai, T. H. 2007. Designing localized algorithms for barrier coverage. In Proceedings of the ACM 13th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 63--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chen, A., Lai, T. H., and Xuan, D. 2008. Measuring and guaranteeing quality of barrier-coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM 9th International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Cheng, M. X., Ruan, L., and Wu, W. 2007. Coverage breach problems in bandwidth-constrained sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 3, 2, 1--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Chin, T.-L., Ramanathan, P., Saluja, K. K., and Wang, K.-C. 2005. Exposure for collaborative detection using mobile sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Choi, W. and Das, S. K. 2006. Coverage-Adaptive random sensor scheduling for application-aware data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Comput. Comm. 29, 17, 3467--3482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Clouqueur, T., Phipatanasuphorn, V., Ramanathan, P., and Saluja, K. K. 2003a. Sensor deployment strategy for detection of targets traversing a region. Mobile Netw. Appl. 8, 4, 453--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Clouqueur, T., Ramanathan, P., and Saluja, K. K. 2003b. Exposure of variable speed targets through a sensor field. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Fusion (IF). 599--605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., and Stein, C. 2001. Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd Ed. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Deng, K. and Liu, Z. 2007. Minimum path exposure and detection interval setting for target detection using wireless sensor network. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 14, 4, 289--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Deshpande, A., Khuller, S., Malekian, A., and Toossi, M. 2008. Energy efficient monitoring in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 8th Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4957, 436--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Deshpande, A., Khuller, S., Malekian, A., and Toossi, M. 2009. Energy efficient monitoring in sensor networks. Tech. rep., Computer Science Department, University of Maryland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Dhillon, S. S. and Chakrabarty, K. 2003. Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 1609--1614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Dhillon, S. S., Chakrabarty, K., and Iyengar, S. 2002. Sensor placement for grid coverage under imprecise detections. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Fusion. 1581--1587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Du, X. and Lin, F. 2005. Maintaining differentiated coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Comm. Netw. 2005, 4, 565--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Duttagupta, A., Bishnu, A., and Sengupta, I. 2006. Optimization problems based on the maximal breach path measure for wireless sensor network coverage. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Distributed Computing and Internet Technology (ICDCIT). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4317, 27--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Duttagupta, A., Bishnu, A., and Sengupta, I. 2008. Maximal breach in wireless sensor networks: Geometric characterization and algorithms. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wirless Sensor Networks (Algosensors). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4837, 126--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. fan Hsin, C. and Liu, M. 2006. Randomly duty-cycled wireless sensor networks: Dynamics of coverage. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Comm. 5, 11, 3182--3192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Fang, C. and Low, C. P. 2007. Redundant coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications. 3535--3540.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Fang, Z. and Wang, J. 2008. Convex combination approximation for the min-cost wsn point coverage problem. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications (WASA). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5258, 188--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Funke, S., Kesselman, A., Kuhn, F., Lotker, Z., and Segal, M. 2007. Improved approximation algorithms for connected sensor cover. Wirel. Netw. 13, 2, 153--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Fusco, G. and Gupta, H. 2009. Selection and orientation of directional sensors for coverage maximization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society 6th Annual Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Gallais, A., Carle, J., Simplot-Ryl, D., and Stojmenovic, I. 2008. Localized sensor area coverage with low communication overhead. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 7, 5, 661--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Gao, Y., Wu, K., and Li, F. 2003. Analysis on the redundancy of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA). 108--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Ghosh, A. and Das, S. K. 2008. Coverage and connectivity issues in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Pervas. Mobile Comput. 4, 3, 303--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Grimmett, G. 1999. Percolation. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Gu, Y., Ji, Y., Li, J., and Zhao, B. 2009. Qos-Aware target coverage in wireless sensor networks. Wiley Wirel. Comm. Mobile Comput. DOI: 10.1002/wcm.748. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Gui, C. and Mohapatra, P. 2004. Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 129--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Gupta, H., Das, S. R., and Gu, Q. 2003. Connected sensor cover: Self-Organization of sensor networks for efficient query execution. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 189--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Gupta, H., Zhou, Z., Das, S. R., and Gu, Q. 2006. Connected sensor cover: Self-Organization of sensor networks for efficient query execution. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 14, 1, 55--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Hall, P. 1988. Introduction to the Theory of Coverage Processes. John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Han, X., Cao, X., Lloyd, E. L., and Shen, C.-C. 2008. Deploying directional sensor networks with guaranteed connectivity and coverage. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 153--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Hefeeda, M. and Ahmadi, H. 2007. A probabilistic coverage protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., and Balakrishnan, H. 2002. An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Comm. 1, 4, 660--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Hörster, E. and Lienhart, R. 2006. On the optimal placement of multiple visual sensors. In Proceedings of the ACM 4th International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks (VSSN). 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Hou, Y.-T., Chen, C.-M., and Jeng, B. 2009. An optimal new-node placement to enhance the coverage of wireless sensor networks. Springer Wirel. Netw. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-009-0186-x. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Hua, C. and Yum, T.-S. P. 2007. Asynchronous random sleeping for sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 3, 3, 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Huang, C.-F., Lo, L.-C., yu Chee Tseng, and Chen, W.-T. 2005a. Decentralized energy-conserving and coverage-preserving protocols for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Huang, C.-F. and Tseng, Y.-C. 2005. A survey of solutions to the coverage problems in wireless sensor networks. J. Internet Technol. 6, 1, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Huang, C.-F., Tseng, Y.-C., and Wu, H.-L. 2007. Distributed protocols for ensuring both coverage and connectivity of a wireless sensor network. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 3, 1, 1--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Huang, H., Richa, A. W., and Segal, M. 2005b. Dynamic coverage in ad-hoc sensor networks. Mobile Netw. Appl. 10, 9--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Huang, L.-S., Xu, H.-L., Wang, Y., Wu, J.-M., and Li, H. 2006. Coverage and exposure paths in wireless sensor networks. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 21, 4, 490--495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Inc., I. 2009. Using the cplex callable library. http://cplex.ilog.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Jaggi, N. and Abouzeid, A. A. 2006. Energy-Efficient connected coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th Asian International Mobile Computing Conference (AMOC). 77--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Jiang, J. and Dou, W. 2004. A coverage-preserving density control algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ad-Hoc Networks and Wireless (Adhoc-Now). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3158, 42--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Kar, K. and Banerjee, S. 2003. Node placement for connected coverage in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Ke, W.-C., Liu, B.-H., and Tsai, M.-J. 2007. Constructing a wireless sensor network to fully cover critical grids by deploying minimum sensors on grid points is np-complete. IEEE Trans. Comput. 56, 5, 710--715. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Kershner, R. 1939. The number of circles covering a set. Amer. J. Math. 61, 3, 665--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Kim, J.-E., Han, J., and Lee, C.-G. 2009. Optimal 3-coverage with minimum separation requirements for ubiquitous computing environments. Springer Mobile Netw. Appli. DOI: 10.1007/s11036-008-0122-9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Kim, J.-E., Yoon, M.-K., Han, J., and Lee, C.-G. 2008. Sensor placement for 3-coverage with minimum separation requirements. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). 266--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Arora, A. 2005. Barrier coverage with wireless sensors. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 284--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Arora, A. 2007a. Barrier coverage with wireless sensors. Wirel. Netw. 13, 6, 817--834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Balogh, J. 2004. On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mobicom). 114--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Balogh, J. 2008. On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network. Springer Wirel. Netw. 14, 3, 277--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., Posner, M. E., and Sinha, P. 2007b. Optimal sleep-wakeup algorithms for barriers of wireless sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks, and Systems (Broadnets). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Lazos, L. and Poovendran, R. 2006. Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 2, 3, 325--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Li, D., Cao, J., Liu, M., and Zheng, Y. 2007. K-Connected target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications (COCOA). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4616, 20--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Lin, F. Y. S. and Chiu, P. L. 2005a. Energy-Efficient sensor network design subject to complete coverage and discrimination constraints. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Lin, F. Y. S. and Chiu, P. L. 2005b. A near-optimal sensor placement algorithm to achieve complete coverage-discrimination in sensor networks. IEEE Comm. Lett. 9, 1, 43--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Lin, F. Y. S. and Chiu, P. L. 2005c. A simulated annealing algorithm for energy-efficient sensor network design. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt). 183--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Liu, B., Dousse, O., Wang, J., and Saipulla, A. 2008a. Strong barrier coverage of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM 9th International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 411--419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Liu, B. and Towsley, D. 2004. A study of the coverage of large-scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS). 475--483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Liu, C., Wu, K., Xiao, Y., and Sun, B. 2006a. Random coverage with guaranteed connectivity: Joint scheduling for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parall. Distrib. Syst. 17, 6, 562--575. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Liu, H., Jia, X., Wan, P.-J., Yi, C.-W., Makki, S. K., and Pissinou, N. 2007. Maximizing lifetime of sensor surveillance systems. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 15, 2, 334--345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Liu, H., Wan, P., and Jia, X. 2006b. Maximal lifetime scheduling for k to 1 sensor-target surveillance networks. Elsevier Comput. Netw. 50, 2, 2839--2854. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Liu, H., Wan, P., and Jia, X. 2006c. Maximal lifetime scheduling for sensor surveillance systems with k sensors to one target. IEEE Trans. Parall. Distrib. Syst. 17, 12, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Liu, H., Wan, P., Yi, C.-W., Jia, X., Kakki, S., and Pissinou, N. 2005. Maximal lifetime scheduling in sensor surveillance networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Conference on Computer Communications. 2482--2491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Liu, L., Ma, H., and Zhang, X. 2008b. On directional k-coverage analysis of randomly deployed camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 2707--2711.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Liu, L., Zhang, X., and ma, H. 2008c. Localization-Oriented coverage based on bayesian estimation in camera sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Liu, Y. and Liang, W. 2005. Approximate coveage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). 68--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Lu, J., Wang, J., and Suda, T. 2007. Scalable coverage maintenance for dense wireless sensor networks. Eurasip J. Wirel. Comm. Netw.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Lu, M., Wu, J., Cardei, M., and Li, M. 2009. Energy-Efficient connected coverage of discrete targets in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiq. Comput. 4, 3-4, 137--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Lyengar, R., Kar, K., and Banerjee, S. 2005. Low-Coordination topologies for redundancy in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM 6th International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 332--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Ma, H. and Liu, Y. 2007. Some problems of directional sensor networks. Int. J. Sensor Netw. 2, 1-2, 44--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. Megerian, S. and Koushanfar, F. 2002. Exposure in wireless sensor networks: Theory and practical solutions. Wirel. Netw. 8, 443--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  101. Megerian, S., Koushanfar, F., Potkonjak, M., and Srivastava, M. B. 2005. Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 4, 1, 84--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Potkonjak, M., and Srivastava, M. B. 2001a. Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Conference on Computer Communications. Vol. 3. 1380--1387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2001b. Exposure in wireless ad hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). 139--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Mehta, D. P., Lopez, M. A., and Lin, L. 2003. Optimal coverage paths in ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 507--511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Mendel, J. M. 1995. Lessons in Estimation Theory for Signal Processing, Communications and Control. Prentice Hall, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Mo, W., Qiao, D., and Wang, Z. 2005. Mostly-Sleeping wireless sensor networks: Connectivity, k-coverage, and α-lifetime. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Mo, W., Qiao, D., and Wang, Z. 2006. Lifetime maximization of sensor networks under connectivity and k-coverage constraints. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). 422--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Noh, Y., Lee, S., and Kim, K. 2008. Central angle decision algorithm in coverage-preserving scheme for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 2492--2496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Onur, E., Ersoy, C., and Delic, H. 2004a. Finding sensing coverage and breach paths in surveillance wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Internal Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). 984--988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Onur, E., Ersoy, C., and Delic, H. 2004b. Sensing coverage and breach paths in surveillance wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Monograph Sensor Network Operations, S. P. and Thomas F. La Porta and C. Griffin, Eds. IEEE Press, Chapter 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Onur, E., Ersoy, C., and Delic, H. 2006. How many sensors for an acceptable breach detection probability? Comput. Comm. 29, 2, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. O'Rourke, J. 1987. Art Gallery Theorems and Algorithms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  113. Paillard, G. and Ravelomananana, V. 2008. Limit theorems for degree of coverage and lifetime in large sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Conference on Computer Communications. 106--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Patel, M., Chandrasekaran, R., and Venkatesan, S. 2005. Energy efficient sensor, relay and base station placements for coverage, connectivity and routing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC). 581--586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Pyun, S.-Y. and Cho, D.-H. 2009. Power-Saving scheduling for multiple-target coverage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Comm. Lett. 13, 2, 130--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Quang, V. T. and Miyoshi, T. 2008. An algorithm for sensing coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sarnoff Symposium. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Quang, V. T. and Miyoshi, T. 2009. A novel gossip-based sensing coverage algorithm for dense wireless sensor networks. Elsevier, Comput. Netw. 53, 13, 2275--2287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Ren, S., Li, Q., Wang, H., Chen, X., and Zhang, X. 2007. Design and analysis of sensing scheduling algorithms under partial coverage for object detection in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parall. Distrib. Syst. 18, 3, 334--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Saipulla, A., Westphal, C., Liu, B., and Wang, J. 2009. Barrier coverage of line-based deployed wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Conference on Computer Communications. 127--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Samko, S. G., Kilbas, A. A., and Marichev, O. I. 1993. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives. Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, Switzerland, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Sen, A., Das, N., Zhou, L., Shen, B. H., Murthy, S., and Bhattacharya, P. 2007. Coverage problem for sensors embedded in temperature sensitive environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th Annual Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Seo, J.-H., Kim, Y.-H., Ryou, H.-B., Cha, S.-H., and Jo, M. 2008. Optimal sensor deployment for wireless surveillance sensor networks by a hybrid steady-state genetic algorithm. IEICE Trans. Comm. E91-B, 3534--3543.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Shih, K.-P., Chen, H.-C., Chou, C.-M., and Liu, B.-J. 2009. On target coverage in wireless heterogeneous sensor networks with multiple sensing units. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. DOI:10.1016/j.jnca.2009.01.002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Slijepcevic, S. and Potkonjak, M. 2001. Power efficient organization of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Vol. 2. 472--476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Stolkin, R. and Florescu, I. 2009. Probability of detection and optimal sensor placement for threshold based detection systems. IEEE Sensor J. 9, 1, 57--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  126. Stolkin, R., Vickers, L., and Nickerson, J. V. 2007. Using environment models to optimize sensor placement. IEEE Sensor J. 7, 3, 319--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  127. Tezcan, N. and Wang, W. 2008. Self-Orienting wireless multimedia sensor networks for maximizing multimedia coverage. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 2206--2210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Tian, D. and Georganas, N. D. 2003. A node scheduling scheme for energy conservation in large wireless sensor networks. J. Wirel. Comm. Mobile Comput. 3, 2, 271--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. Tian, D. and Georganas, N. D. 2004. Location and calculation-free node-scheduling schemes in large wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 2, 1, 65--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  130. Tian, D. and Georganas, N. D. 2005. Connectivity maintenance and coverage preservation in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 3, 6, 744--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  131. Tian, Y., Zhang, S.-F., and Wang, Y. 2008. A distributed protocol for ensuring both probabilistic coverage and connectivity of high density wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 2069--2074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Tsai, Y.-R. 2008. Sensing coverage for randomly distributed wireless sensor networks in shadowed environments. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 57, 1, 556--564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  133. Vashistha, S., Azad, A. P., and Chockalingam, A. 2007a. Efficient scheduling of sensor activity for information coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Communication System Software and Middleware (COMSWARE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Vashistha, S., Azad, A. P., and Chockalingam, A. 2007b. Energy efficient area monitoring using information coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Veltri, G., Huang, Q., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2003. Minimal and maximal exposure path algorithms for wireless embedded sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). 40--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  136. Venkataraman, J., Haenggi, M., and Collins, O. 2006. Short noise models for the dual problems of cooperative coverage and outage in random networks. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Wan, P.-J. and Yi, C.-W. 2006. Coverage by randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 6, 2658--2669. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  138. Wang, B. 2008. Sensor placement for complete information coverage in distributed sensor networks. World Scientific J. Circ. Syst. Comput. 17, 4, 627--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  139. Wang, B., Chua, K. C., and Srinivasan, V. 2008. Connected sensor cover for area information coverage in wireless sensor networks. Wiley J. Comm. Syst. 21, 11, 1181--1203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  140. Wang, B., Chua, K. C., Srinivasan, V., and Wang, W. 2006. Scheduling sensor activity for point information coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modelling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  141. Wang, B., Chua, K. C., Srinivasan, V., and Wang, W. 2007a. Information coverage in randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Comm. 6, 8, 2994--3004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  142. Wang, B., Chua, K. C., Wang, W., and Srinivasan, V. 2005a. Worst and best information exposure paths in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN05). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3794, 52--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  143. Wang, B., Fu, C., and Lim, H. B. 2009a. Layered diffusion based coverage control in wireless sensor networks. Elsevier Comput. Netw. 53, 7, 1114--1124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  144. Wang, B., Vikram, S., Chua, K. C., and Wang, W. 2007b. Information coverage and network lifetime in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 32rd Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN). 512--519. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  145. Wang, B., Wang, W., Srinivasan, V., and Chua, K. C. 2005b. Information coverage for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Comm. Lett. 9, 11, 967--969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  146. Wang, C., Thai, M. T., Li, Y., Wang, F., and WeiliWu. 2009b. Optimization scheme for sensor coverage scheduling with bandwidth constraints. Optim. Lett. 3, 1, 63--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  147. Wang, C., Thai, M. T., Li, Y., Wang, F., and Wu, W. 2007c. Minimum coverage breach and maximum network lifetime in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Globecom). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. Wang, J. and Medidi, S. 2007. Energy efficient coverage with variable sensing radii in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob). 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  149. Wang, J., Niu, C., and Shen, R. 2007d. Randomized approach for target coverage scheduling in directional sensor network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems (ICESS). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4527, 379--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. Wang, J. and Zhong, N. 2006. Efficient point coverage in wireless sensor networks. J. Combin. Optim. 11, 3, 291--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  151. Wang, L. and Kulkarni, S. S. 2008. Sacrificing a little coverage can substantially increase network lifetime. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 6, 8, 1281--1300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  152. Wang, L. and Xiao, Y. 2006. A survey of energy-efficient scheduling mechanisms in sensor networks. Mobile Netw. Appl. 11, 5, 723--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  153. Wang, R. and Cao, W. 2007. Universal information coverage for bandwidth-constrained sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). 904--907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. Wang, W., Srinivasan, V., Chua, K.-C., and Wang, B. 2007e. Energy-efficient coverage for target detection in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  155. Wang, Y.-C., Hu, C.-C., and Tseng, Y.-C. 2005c. Efficient deployment algorithms for ensuring coverage and connectivity of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless Internet. 114--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  156. Williams, R. 1979. The Geometrical Foundation of Natural Stucture: A Source Book of Design. Dover, New York, 51--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. Wilson, J. S. 2005. Sensor Technology Handbook. Elseiver.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. Wu, J. and Yang, S. 2005. Energy-efficient node scheduling models in sensor networks with adjustable ranges. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 16, 1, 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  159. Wu, K., Gao, Y., Li, F., and Xiao, Y. 2005. Lightweight deployment-aware scheduling for wireless sensor networks. Springer Mobile Netw. Appl. 10, 6, 837--852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  160. Wu, Q., Rao, N. S., Du, X., Iyengar, S. S., and Vaishnavi, V. K. 2007. On efficient deployment of sensor on planar grid. Elsevier Comput. Comm. 30, 14-15, 2721--2734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  161. Wu, T.-T. and Ssu, K.-F. 2005. Determining active sensor nodes for complete coverage without location information. Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiq. Comput. 1, 1, 38--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  162. Xing, G., Lu, C., Pless, R., and O'Sullivan, J. A. 2004. Co-Grid: An efficient coverage maintenance protocol for distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). 414--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  163. Xing, G., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Lu, C., Pless, R., and Gill, C. 2005. Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 1, 1, 36--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  164. Xu, X. and Sahni, S. 2007. Approximation algorithms for sensor deployment. IEEE Trans. Comput. 56, 12, 1681--1695. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  165. Xu, Y. and Yao, X. 2006. A ga approach to the optimal placement of sensors in wireless sensor networks with obstacles and preferences. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC). 127--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. Yan, T., Gu, Y., He, T., and Stankovic, J. A. 2008. Design and optimization of distributed sensing coverage in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 7, 3, 1--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  167. Yang, G. and Qiao, D. 2009. Barrier information coverage with wireless sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Conference on Computer Communicaations. 918--926.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. Yang, G., Shukla, V., and Qiao, D. 2008. Analytical study of collaborative information coverage for object detection in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 144--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. Yang, S., Dai, F., Cardei, M., and Wu, J. 2005. On multiple point coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS). 757--764.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. Yang, S., Dai, F., Cardei, M., Wu, J., and Patterson, F. 2006. On connected multiple point coverage in wireless sensor networks. Springer Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 13,4, 289--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  171. Yates, R. D. and Goodman, D. J. 1999. Probability and Stochastic Processes: A Friendly Introduction for Electrical and Computer Engineers. John Wiley and Son.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. Ye, F., Zhang, H., Lu, S., Zhang, L., and Hou, J. 2006. A randomized energy-conservation protocol for resilient sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 12, 5, 637--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  173. Yen, L.-H., Yu, C. W., and Cheng, Y.-M. 2006. Expected k-coverage in wireless sensor networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 4, 5, 636--650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  174. Yick, J., Mukherjee, B., and Ghosal, D. 2008. Wireless sensor network survey. Elsevier Comput. Netw. 52, 12, 2292--2330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. Younis, O., Krunz, M., and Ramasubramanian, S. 2008. Location-Unaware coverage in wireless sensor networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw. 6, 7, 1078--1097. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  176. Zhang, H. and Hou, J. 2004. On deriving the upper bound of α-lifetime for large sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). 121--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  177. Zhang, H. and Hou, J. C. 2005a. Maintaining sensing coverage and connectivity in large sensor networks. J. Ad Hoc Sensor Wirel. Netw. 1, 1-2, 89--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. Zhang, H. and Hou, J. C. 2005b. On the upper bound of α-lifetime for large sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 1, 2, 272--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  179. Zhang, J., Yan, T., and Son, S. H. 2006. Deployment strategies for differentiated detection in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 316--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. Zhang, M., Chan, M. C., and Ananda, A. L. 2007. Coverage protocol for wireless sensor networks using distance estimates. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th Annual Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  181. Zhao, C., Yu, Z., and Chen, P. 2007. Optimal deployment of nodes based on genetic algorithm in heterogeneous sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCom). 2743--2746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. Zhao, Q. and Gurusamy, M. 2005. Lifetime maximization using observation time scheduling in multi-hop sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CreateNet International Workshop on Broadband Advanced Sensor Networks (BroadNets).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. Zhao, Q. and Gurusamy, M. 2006. Maximizing network lifetime for connected target coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile, Networking and Communications (WiMob). 94--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  184. Zhao, Q. and Gurusamy, M. 2007. Optimal observation scheduling for connected target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 3728--3733.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. Zhao, Q. and Gurusamy, M. 2008a. Connected k-target coverage problem in wireless sensor networks with different observation scenarios. Comput. Netw. 52, 11, 2205--2220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  186. Zhao, Q. and Gurusamy, M. 2008b. Lifetime maximization for connected target coverage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 16, 6, 1378--1391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  187. Zhao, T. and Zhao, Q. 2009. Lifetime maximization based on coverage and connectivity in wireless sensor networks. Springer J. Signal Process. Syst. DOI: 10.1007/s11265-008-0324-1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  188. Zhou, Z., Das, S., and Gupta, H. 2004. Variable radii connected sensor cover in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). 387--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  189. Zhou, Z., Das, S., and Gupta, H. 2005. Fault tolerant connected sensor cover with variable sensing and transmission ranges. In Proceedings of the IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. Zhou, Z., Das, S. R., and Gupta, H. 2009. Variable radii connected sensor cover in sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 5, 1, 1--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  191. Zou, Y. and Chakrabarty, K. 2004a. Sensor deployment and target localization in distributed sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 3, 1, 61--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  192. Zou, Y. and Chakrabarty, K. 2004b. Uncertainty-Aware and coverage-oriented deployment for sensor networks. J. Parall. Distrib. Comput. 64, 7, 788--798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  193. Zou, Y. and Chakrabarty, K. 2005. A distributed coverage- and connectivity-centric technique for selecting active nodes in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 54, 8, 978--991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Coverage problems in sensor networks: A survey

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Computing Surveys
            ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 43, Issue 4
            October 2011
            556 pages
            ISSN:0360-0300
            EISSN:1557-7341
            DOI:10.1145/1978802
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 October 2011
            • Accepted: 1 January 2010
            • Revised: 1 December 2009
            • Received: 1 February 2008
            Published in csur Volume 43, Issue 4

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader