skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979273acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From garments to gardens: negotiating material relationships online and 'by hand'

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

From home improvement to scrapbooking, leisure activities performed "by hand" increasingly involve digital tools. In turn, software and devices to support handwork are proliferating. We use data from an observational field study of gardening and knitting to examine relationships to information technology. Handwork experiences of patience, effort, sensation, and cleverness can shift with the introduction of new tools. Our participants' attachment to these experiences made them sensitive to the potential consequences of introducing new tools. Digital tools were sometimes rejected and other times woven into handwork activities. In response, we propose three metaphors for handwork practice - extending, interjecting, and segmenting - as a resource for moving beyond the binary opposition of digital and physical practices.

References

  1. Adamson, G. 2008. Thinking Through Craft. Oxford: Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, A. and Hagel, J. 2000. The Real Value of On-line Communities. In Knowledge and Communities. Eds. Lesser E. L., et al. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bødker, S. 2000. Scenarios in user-centred design - setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with Com-puters. 13(1): 61--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Blanchette, J.-F. A Material History of Bits. (in preparation). Retrieved on January 10, 2011 from http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/blanchette/papers/materiality.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buechley, L. and Hill, B. M. 2010. LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proc. DIS '10. ACM Press, 199--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Crawford, M. B. 2009. Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry into the Value of Work. London: Penguin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dormer, P. 1997. The language and practical philosophy of craft. In The Culture of Craft, P. Dormer (ed.). Manchester: Manchester UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Francis M. and Hester R. T. 1990. The Garden as Idea, Place, Action. Pp 7--20 in The Meaning of Gardens. Eds. M. Francis and R. T. Hester. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenhalgh, P. 1997. The language and practical philosophy of craft. In The Culture of Craft. Ed. P. Dormer. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimes, A. and Harper, R. 2008. Celebratory Technology: New Directions for Food Research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2008. ACM Press, 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ingold, T. 2010. The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 34(1): 91--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Johnson, J. S., Hawley, J. 2004. Technology's impact on creative traditions: Pieceful co-existence in quilting. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(1/2), 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Johnson, J. S., Wilson L. E. 2005. "It Says You Really Care": Motivational Factors of Contemporary Female Handcrafters. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B. and Takayama, L. 2006. How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In Proc. DIS '06. ACM Press, 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kitchen, N. R. 2008. Emerging technologies for real-time and integrated agriculture decisions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 61(1): 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. 2010. Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Projects, Communities, and Cultures. In Proc. NordiCHI '10. ACM Press, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Levine, F. and Heimerl, C. Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lucie-Smith, E. 1983. The story of craft: the craftsman's role in society. Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. McCullough, M. 1996. Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Minahan, S., & Cox, J. W. 2007. Stitch' n bitch - Cyberferninism, a third place and the new materiality. Journal of Material Culture, 12(1): 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. The National NeedleArts Association. 2007. The State of Specialty NeedleArts 2007: Executive Summary.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pudup, M. B. 2008. It takes a garden: Cultivating citizen-subjects in organized garden projects. Geoforum. 39(3): 1228--1240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Pye, D. The nature and art of workmanship. 1995. London: Herbert Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Repperger, D. and Phillips, C. 2009. The Human Role in Automation. In Springer Handbook of Automation. Ed. S.Y. Nof. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robles, E. and Wiberg, M. Texturing the "Material Turn" in Interaction Design. In Proc. TEI '10. ACM Press, 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Rosner, D. K., Ryokai, K. 2009. Reflections on Craft: Probing the Creative Process of Everyday Knitters. In Proc. C & C '09. ACM Press, 195--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Scheper-Hughes, N. 2003. Anatomy of a Quilt: The Gees' Bend Freedom Quilting Bee. Anthropology Today. 19(4):15--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sennett, R. 2008. The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, A., Wyche, S. and Kaye, J. 2008. Pottering by design. In Proc NordiCHI '08. ACM Press, 363--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Torrey, C., Churchill, E., McDonald, D. 2009. Learning How: The Search for Craft Knowledge on the Internet. In Proc. CHI'09. ACM Press, 1371--1381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Torrey, C., D. W. McDonald, B. N. Schilit and S. Bly. 2007. How-To Pages: Informal Systems of Expertise Sharing. In Proc. ECSCW '07. Springer, 391--410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner-Rahman, G. 2008. Parallel Practices and the Dialectics of Open Creative Production. Journal of Design History. 22(4): 71--386. .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood, N., Rust, C., and Horne, G. 2009. A Tacit Understanding: The Designer's Role in Capturing and Passing on the Skilled Knowledge of Master Craftsmen. International Journal of Design {Online} 3:3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, P., Wallace, J., and McCarthy, J. 2008. Aesthetics and experience-centred design ACM TOCHI. 15(4): 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zerubavel, E. 1992. Hidden Rhythm. Berkeley, CA: U. of California P.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. From garments to gardens: negotiating material relationships online and 'by hand'
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      3530 pages
      ISBN:9781450302289
      DOI:10.1145/1978942

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader