skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979702acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

MudPad: tactile feedback for touch surfaces

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

MudPad is a system enriching touch surfaces with localized active haptic feedback. A soft and flexible overlay containing magnetorheological fluid is actuated by an array of electromagnets to create a variety of tactile sensations. As each magnet can be controlled individually, we are able to produce feedback in realtime locally at arbitrary points of interaction.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

in151.mp4

mp4

26.8 MB

References

  1. O. Bau, I. Poupyrev, A. Israr, and C. Harrison. Teslatouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proc. of UIST '10, pp 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Bianchi, I. Oakley, and D. S. Kwon. The secure haptic keypad: a tactile password system. In Proc. of CHI '10, pp. 1089--1092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Block, H. Gellersen, and N. Villar. Touch-display keyboards: transforming keyboards into interactive surfaces. In Proc. of CHI '10, pp. 1145--1154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Harrison and S. E. Hudson. Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In Proc. of CHI '09, pp. 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Hoffmann, D. Spelmezan, and J. Borchers. Typeright: a keyboard with tactile error prevention. In Proc. of CHI '09, pp. 2265--2268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. E. Hoggan, S. Anwar, and S. A. Brewster. Mobile multi-actuator tactile displays. In HAID'07: Proc. of the 2nd int. conference on Haptic and audio interaction design, pp. 22--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Hoggan, S. A. Brewster, and J. Johnston. Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. In Proc. of CHI '08, pp. 1573--1582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Hook, S. Taylor, A. Butler, N. Villar, and S. Izadi. A reconfigurable ferromagnetic input device. In Proc. of UIST '09, pp. 51--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Jansen, T. Karrer, and J. Borchers. Mudpad: Tactile feedback and haptic texture overlay for touch surfaces. In Proc. of ITS '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Leithinger and H. Ishii. Relief: A scalable actuated shape display. In Proc. of TEI '10, pp. 221--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Marquardt, M. A. Nacenta, J. E. Young, S. Carpendaled, S. Greenberg, and E. Sharlin. The haptic tabletop puck: Tactile feedback for interactive tabletops. In Proc. of ITS '09, pp. 85 -- 92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Poupyrev, T. Nashida, S. Maruyama, J. Rekimoto, and Y. Yamaji. Lumen: Interactive visual and shape display for calm computing. In SIGGRAPH '04 Emerging technologies, page 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Yatani and K. N. Truong. Semfeel: a user interface with semantic tactile feedback for mobile touch-screen devices. In Proc. of UIST '09, pp. 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MudPad: tactile feedback for touch surfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      2554 pages
      ISBN:9781450302685
      DOI:10.1145/1979742

      Copyright © 2011 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader