skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979746acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Touch-Bookmark: a lightweight navigation and bookmarking technique for e-books

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The navigation function of an e-book significantly influences its usability. In this paper, we introduce Touch-Bookmark (TB), a multitouch navigation technique for e-books. TB enables users to bookmark a page in a casual manner and return to it quickly when required. Moreover, the users can flip between two remote pages by using simple gestures. In a usability test conducted to evaluate our prototype, users found the technique easy to learn, natural to use, and useful for navigation. Analysis of the patterns of interaction gestures helped identify human factors that should be considered when designing touch interfaces for e-books. The factors include navigation strategies, patterns of interaction gestures, types of books, and motor memory.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

wp119.mp4

mp4

41.6 MB

References

  1. ADLER, M., AND VAN DOREN, C. How to read a book. Touchston, New York, NY, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. APPLE. iBooks for iPad. http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ibooks/id364709193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CHEN, N., GUIMBRETIERE, F., DIXON, M., LEWIS, C., AND AGRAWALA, M. Navigation techniques for dual-display e-book readers. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1779--1788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. HOLLAN, J., HUTCHINS, E., AND KIRSH, D. Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 2 (2000), 196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. KLEMMER, S., HARTMANN, B., AND TAKAYAMA, L. How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In Proc. DIS 2006, ACM Press (2006), 140--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. MARSHALL, C., AND BLY, S. Turning the page on navigation. In Proc. JCDL 2005, ACM Press (2005), 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. O'HARA, K., AND SELLEN, A. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proc. CHI 1997, ACM Press (1997), 335--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. WATANABE, J., MOCHIZUKI, A., AND HORRY, Y. Bookisheet: Bendable device for browsing content using the metaphor of leafing through the pages. In Proc. Ubicomp 2008, ACM Press (2008), 360--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. WIGHTMAN, D., GINN, T., AND VERTEGAAL, R. TouchMark: Flexible document navigation and bookmarking techniques for e-book readers. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. WILSON, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 4 (2002), 625.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. HINCKLEY, K., YATANI, K., PAHUD, M., CODDINGTON, N., RODENHOUSE, J., WILSON, A., BENKO, H., AND BUXTON, B. Pen + touch = new tools, In Proc. UIST 2010, ACM Press(2010), 27--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Touch-Bookmark: a lightweight navigation and bookmarking technique for e-books

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      2554 pages
      ISBN:9781450302685
      DOI:10.1145/1979742

      Copyright © 2011 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader