skip to main content
research-article

Designing aggregation mechanisms for reputation systems in online marketplaces

Published:01 June 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A seller in an online marketplace with an effective reputation mechanism should expect that dishonest behavior results in higher payments now, while honest behavior results in higher reputation---and thus higher payments---in the future. We briefly survey recent results on the Window Aggregation Mechanism, a widely used class of mechanisms that shows the average value of the seller's ratings within some fixed window of past transactions. We suggest approaches for choosing the window size that maximizes the range of parameters for which it is optimal for the seller to be truthful. We show that mechanisms that use information from a larger number of past transactions tend to provide incentives for patient sellers to be more truthful, but for higher quality sellers to be less truthful. We then discuss a broader class of aggregation mechanisms that weight recent ratings more heavily and show that the same insight applies.

References

  1. Adlakha, S., Johari, R., Weintraub, G., and Goldsmith, A. 2010. Mean field equilibrium in concave stochastic games. Working paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. of Econom. 84, 3, 488--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Aperjis, C. and Johari, R. 2010a. Designing reputation mechanisms for efficient trade. Tech. rep., Stanford University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aperjis, C. and Johari, R. 2010b. Optimal windows for aggregating ratings in electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 56, 5 (May), 864--880. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., and Lockwood, K. 2006. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Econom. 9, 2 (June), 79--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124--1131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing aggregation mechanisms for reputation systems in online marketplaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader