skip to main content
10.1145/1982185.1982518acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Planning service agreements in soa-based systems through stochastic models

Published:21 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm enables the organizations to compose complex business applications from distributed services, supported by third party partners. Usually, Service Level Agreements (SLA) are used to establish the requirements between customers and providers. Efforts to predict the quality of SOA transactions are justified by anticipate possible problems that tends to arise at run-time, disturbing the SLA clauses. In this paper, we proposed a SLA-oriented approach, through stochastic models, to predict resource consumption and service levels degradation in scenarios with different compositions and workloads. Our proposal may be adopted both at design-time and runtime. Measures from a real SOA implementation were used to validate our contributions.

References

  1. V. A. F. Almeida and D. A. Menasce. Capacity Planning for Web Services: metrics, models, and methods. Prentice Hall, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Baresi and S. Guinea. A dynamic and reactive approach to the supervision of bpel processes. In Annual India Software Engineering Conference, pages 39--48, Hyderabad, India, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Dambrogio and P. Bocciarelli. A model-driven approach to describe and predict the performance of composite services. In Workshop on Software and Performance, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. M. Josuttis. SOA in practice. Oreilly, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. LAAS. Time Petri Net Analyzer - TINA 2.9.8. URL: http://homepages.laas.fr/bernard/tina, August 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Liu, I. Gorton, and L. Zhu. Performance prediction of service-oriented applications based on an enterprise. In International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Beijing, China, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. A. Marsan, G. Balbo, and G. C. et al. Modelling with Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets. Wiley series in parallel computing. Wiley, New York, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Marzolla and R. Mirandola. Performance prediction of web service workflows. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, Germany, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Microsystems. Sun GlassFish Enterprise Server. URL:'https://glassfish.dev.java.net', July 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Oasis. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. OBrien, P. Brebner, and J. Gray. Business transformation to soa: Aspects of the migration and performance and qos issues. In International Workshop on Systems Development in SOA Environments, pages 35--37, Leipzig, Germany, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Papazoglou, P. Traverso, S. Dustdar, and F. Leymann. Service-oriented computing: State of the art and research challenges. In IEEE Computer Society, pages 38--45, California, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. J. Project. jMeter 2.3.2. URL:'http://jakarta.apache.org', June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Raibulet and M. Massarelli. Managing non-functional aspects in soa through sla. In International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Application, Turin, Italy, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Rud, A. Schmietendorf, and R. Dumke. Performance annotated business processes in serviceoriented architectures. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science & Technology. Special Issue on Performance Modelling of Computer Networks, Systems and Services, 8(3): 61--71, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Sturm, W. Morris, and M. Jander. Foundations of Service Level Management. Sams Publishing, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Teixeira, R. Lima, C. Oliveira, and P. Maciel. Performance evaluation of service-oriented architecture through stochastic petri nets. In International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Texas, USA, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Teixeira, R. Lima, C. Oliveira, and P. Maciel. A stochastic model for performance evaluation and bottleneck discovering on soa-based systems. In International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Istanbul, Turkey, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Zimmermann. TimeNET 4.0. URL: 'http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/TimeNET', January 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '11: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 2011
    1868 pages
    ISBN:9781450301138
    DOI:10.1145/1982185

    Copyright © 2011 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 March 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader