skip to main content
10.1145/1998196.1998203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Metric graph reconstruction from noisy data

Published:13 June 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many real-world data sets can be viewed of as noisy samples of special types of metric spaces called metric graphs [16]. Building on the notions of correspondence and Gromov-Hausdorff distance in metric geometry, we describe a model for such data sets as an approximation of an underlying metric graph. We present a novel algorithm that takes as an input such a data set, and outputs the underlying metric graph with guarantees. We also implement the algorithm, and evaluate its performance on a variety of real world data sets.

References

  1. Earthquake search. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/epic/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Openstreetmap. http://www.openstreetmap.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H. Abramowicz, D. Horn, U. Naftaly, and C. Sahar-Pikielny. Orientation selective neural network for cosmic muon identification. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 389(1--2):163--166, 1997. New Computing Techniques in Physics Research V.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Amenta, M. Bern, and D. Eppstein. The crust and the β-skeleton: Combinatorial curve reconstruction. Graph. Models Image Process., 60(2):125--135, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Arias-Castro, D. L. Donoho,, and X. Huo. Adaptive multiscale detection of filamentary structures in a background of uniform random points. Annals of Statistics, 34(1):326--349, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D. Burago, Y. Burago, and S. Ivanov. A Course in Metric Geometry, volume 33 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Chazal, D. Cohen Steiner, and Q. Mérigot. Geometric Inference for Measures based on Distance Functions. Research Report RR-6930, INRIA, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Chen, L. J. Guibas, J. Hershberger, and J. Sun. Road network reconstruction for organizing paths. In Proceedings 21st ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. Choi, N. A. Bond, M. A. Strauss, A. L. Coil, M. Davis, and C. N. A. Willmer. Tracing the filamentary structure of the galaxy distribution at z~0.8. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, pages 692--, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. K. Dey, K. Mehlhorn, and E. A. Ramos. Curve reconstruction: Connecting dots with good reason. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pages 197--206. ACM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. K. Dey and R. Wenger. Reconstructing curves with sharp corners. Comput. Geom. Theory Appl., 19:89--99, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. R. Genovese, M. Perone-Pacifico, I. Verdinelli, and L. Wasserman. On the path density of a gradient field. Annals of Statistics, 37(6A):3236--3271, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. C. R. Genovese, M. Perone-Pacifico, I. verdinelli, and L. Wasserman. Nonparametric Filament Estimation. ArXiv e-prints, Mar. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Gromov. Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces. Birkhäuser, 2nd edition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Heath, N. Gelfand, M. Ovsjanikov, M. Aanjaneya, and L. J. Guibas. Image webs: Computing and exploiting connectivity in image collections. Twenty-Third IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. P. Kuchment. Quantum graphs I. Some basic structures. Waves in Random Media, 14(1):S107--S128, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. Qaddoumi, E. Ranu, J. D. McColskey, R. Mirshahi, and R. Zoughi. Microwave detection of stress-induced fatigue cracks in steel and potential for crack opening determination. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 12(2):87--104, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Siek, L.-Q. Lee, and A. Lumsdaine. Boost graph library. http://www.boost.org/libs/graph/, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. F. Tupin, H. Maitre, Mangin, N. J.-F., J.-M., and E. Pechersky. Detection of linear features in SAR images: Application to road network extraction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36:434--453, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Metric graph reconstruction from noisy data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SoCG '11: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry
      June 2011
      532 pages
      ISBN:9781450306829
      DOI:10.1145/1998196

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader