Diane M. Strong
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Exceptions, situations that cannot be correctly processed by computer systems, occur frequently in computer-based information processes. Five perspectives on exceptions provide insights into why exceptions occur and how they might be eliminated or more efficiently handled. We investigate these perspectives using an in-depth study of an operating information process that has frequent exceptions. Our results support the use of a total quality management (TQM) approach of eliminating exceptions for some exceptions, in particular, those caused by computer systems that are poor matches to organizational processes. However, some exceptions are explained better by a political system perspective of conflicting goals between subunits. For these exceptions and several other types, designing an integrated human-computer process will provide better performance than will eliminating exceptions and moving toward an entirely automated process.
- ANDERSON, J.R. 1980. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
- BArnEY, J. E. mUD PERSON, S.W. 1983. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci. 29, 5 (May), 530-545.Google Scholar
- BAINBRIDGE, L. 1987. Ironies of automation. In New Technology and Human Error, J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, and J. Leplat, Eds. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 271-283.Google Scholar
- BENBASAT, I., GOLDSTEIN, D. K., AND MEAD, M. 1987. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11, 3 (Sept.), 369-386. Google Scholar
- BENDIFALLAH, S. AND SCACCHI, W. 1987. Understanding software maintenance work. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE~13, 3 (Mar.), 311-323. Google Scholar
- CASE, K.E. 1987. Quality control and assurance. In Production Handbook, J. A. White. Ed., 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- COHEN, M.D. 1991. Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Org. Sci. 2, i (Feb.), 135-139.Google Scholar
- COHEN, M. n. AND BACDAYAN, P. 1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Org. Sci. 5, 4 (Nov.), 554-568.Google Scholar
- COHEN, R. M. AND MAY, J.H. 1992. An application-based agenda for encorporating OR into an AI design environment for facility design. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 63, 254-270.Google Scholar
- COHEN, R. M. AND STRONG, D.M. 1991. A model for supporting database design. In Proceedrags of the 1st Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems. Cambridge, Mass., 243-273.Google Scholar
- DAVENPORT, T.H. 1993. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. Google Scholar
- DAVENPORT, T. H. AND SHORT, J.E. 1990. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Manag. Rev. 31, 4 (Summer), 11-27.Google Scholar
- DEMING, W. 1986. Out of Crisis. Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Inst. of Technolog3r, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- ERICSSON, K. A. AND SIMON, H.A. 1984. Protocol Analysts. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- FIEGENBAUM, A.V. 1991. Total Quality Control, 4th ed., Revised. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- FRANZ, C. R. AND ROBEY, D. 1984. An investigation of user-led system design: Rational and political perspectives. Commun. ACM 27, 12 (Dec.), 1202-1217. Google Scholar
- GALBaAITH, J.R. 1977. Orgamzation Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
- GALBRAITH, J.R. 1973. The Design of Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
- GASSER, L. 1986. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 4, 3 (July), 205-225. Google Scholar
- GOLDSTEIN, R. C. AND STOREY, V. C. 1991. The role of commonsense in database design. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems. Cambridge, Mass., 141-150.Google Scholar
- HAMMER, M. 1990. Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68, 4 (July-Aug.), 104-112.Google Scholar
- ISmKAWA, K. 1985. What is Total Qualzty Control? The Japanese Way. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
- JURAN, J.M. 1989. Juran on Leadershzp for Quality: An Executive Handbook. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- KLING, R. 1980. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Comput. Surv. 12, i (Mar.), 61-110. Google Scholar
- KLING, R. AND IACONO, S. 1984a. The control of information systems developments after implementation. Commun. ACM 27, 12 (Dec.), 1218-1226. Google Scholar
- KLING, R. AND IACONO, S. 1984b. Computing as an occasion for social control. J. Soc. Iss. 40, 3, 77 96.Google Scholar
- LENAT, D. B., GUHA, R. V., PITTMAN, K., PRATT, D., AND SHEPHERD, M. 1990. CYC: Toward programs with common sense. Commun. ACM 33, 8 (Aug.), 30-49. Google Scholar
- MARCH, J. G. AND SIMON, H.A. 1958. Organ,zattons. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- MARKUS, M.L. 1984. Systems in Organizations: Bugs + Features. Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, Mass.Google Scholar
- MARKUS, M.L. 1983. Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Comrnun. ACM 26, 6 (June), 430-444. Google Scholar
- MARKUS, M. L. AND ROBEY, D. 1988. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Manag. Sci. 34, 5 (May), 583-598. Google Scholar
- NELSON, R. R. AND WINTER, S.G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economlc Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- NISBETT, R. E. AND WILSON, T.D. 1977. Telling more than we know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84, 3, 231-259.Google Scholar
- PRIETULA, M. J. AND SIMON, H.A. 1989. The experts in your midst. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67, 1 (Jan.-Feb.), 120-124.Google Scholar
- RASMUSSEN, J., DUNCAN, K., AND LEPLAT, J. (Eds.). 1987. New Technology and Human Error. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- SASSO, W. C., OLSON, J. R., AND MERTEN, A.G. 1987. The practice of office analysis: Objectives, obstacles, and opportunities. IEEE Office Know. Eng. 1, 1, 11-24.Google Scholar
- SCHNEIDEWIND, N. F. 1987. The state of software maintenance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-13, 3 (Mar.), 303-310. Google Scholar
- SIMON, H.A. 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd ed. MIT Press. Cambridge. Mass. Google Scholar
- SIMON, H.A. 1977. The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google Scholar
- SIMON, H.A. 1973. Applying information technology to organization design. Pub. Admm. Rev. (May/June), 268-278.Google Scholar
- SIRBU, M., SCHOICHET, S., KUNIN, J. S., HAMMER, M., AND SUTHERLAND, J. 1984. OAM: An office analysis methodology. Behav. Inf. Tech. 3, 1, 25-39.Google Scholar
- STERLING, T.D. 1974. Guidelines for humanizing computerized information systems: A report from Stanley House. Commun. ACM 17, 11 (Nov.), 609-613. Google Scholar
- STINCHCOMBE, A. L. 1990. Information and Organizations. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif. Google Scholar
- STOREY, V. C. AND GOLDSTEIN, R.C. 1993. Knowledge-based approaches to database design. MIS Q. 17, 1 (Mar.), 25-46.Google Scholar
- STRONG, D. M~ 1992. Decision support for exception handling and quality control in office operations. Dec. Supp. Syst. $, 3 (July), 217-227. Google Scholar
- STRONG, D.M. 1989. Integration of expert systems, traditional systems, and people: A manufacturing example. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Expert Systems and the Leading Edge in Production and Operations Management. Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C., 57-69.Google Scholar
- SUCH~N, L.A. 1983. Office procedure as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Trans. Office Inf. Syst. 1, 4 (Oct.), 320-328. Google Scholar
- SVIOKLA, J.J. 1990. An examination of the impact of expert systems on the firm: The case of XCON. MIS Q. 14, 2 (June), 126-140. Google Scholar
- SWANSON, E. B. AND BEAT~{, C.M. 1989. Maintaining Information Sysems ~n Organizations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England. Google Scholar
- TODD, P. AND BENBASAT, I. 1987. Process tracing methods in decision support systems research: Exploring the black box. MIS Q. 11, 4 (Dec.), 492-512. Google Scholar
- WHITTEN, J., BENTLEY, L. D., ANn BARLOW, V.M. 1989. Systems Analysis and Design Methods, 2nd ed. Irwin, Homewood, Ill. Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Exceptions and exception handling in computerized information processes
Recommendations
Efficient Java exception handling in just-in-time compilation
Research ArticlesJava uses exceptions to provide elegant error handling capabilities during program execution. However, the presence of exception handlers complicates the job of the just-in-time (JIT) compiler, while exceptions are rarely used in most programs. This ...
Consulting past exceptions to facilitate workflow exception handling
In this paper, we propose an architecture model that deals with both expected and unexpected exceptions in the context of workflow management. Expected exceptions and their handling approaches are specified by ECA rules, while cases of unexpected ...
Towards architecture-level middleware-enabled exception handling of component-based systems
CBSE '11: Proceedings of the 14th international ACM Sigsoft symposium on Component based software engineeringException handling is a practical and important way to improve the availability and reliability of a component-based system. The classical code-level exception handling approach is usually applied to the inside of a component, while some exceptions can ...
Comments