skip to main content
10.1145/2018602.2018611acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Inferring the QoE of HTTP video streaming from user-viewing activities

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

HTTP video streaming, employed by most of the video-sharing websites, allows users to control the video playback using, for example, pausing and switching the bit rate. These user-viewing activities can be used to mitigate the temporal structure impairments of the video quality. On the other hand, other activities, such as mouse movement, do not help reduce the impairment level. In this paper, we have performed subjective experiments to analyze user-viewing activities and correlate them with network path performance and user quality of experience. The results show that network measurement alone may miss important information about user dissatisfaction with the video quality. Moreover, video impairments can trigger user-viewing activities, notably pausing and reducing the screen size. By including the pause events into the prediction model, we can increase its explanatory power.

References

  1. Endace DAG card. http://www.endace.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IBM SPSS Statistics. http://www.spss.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Adobe. Video Technology Center, Delivery: Progressive download. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/video/progressive.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proc. ACM SIGIR, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Avallone, S. Guadagno, D. Emma, A. Pescapè, and G. Ventre. D-ITG Distributed internet traffic generator. International Conf. on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, 0:316--317, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Brant. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4):1171--1178, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Chen, S.-Y. Lee, and H. W. Stevenson. Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3):170--175, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. E. Downing. System usage behavior as a proxy for user satisfaction: an empirical investigation. Information & Management, 35:p.203--216, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. Gopalakrishnan, R. Jana, R. Knag, K. Ramakrishnan, D. Swayne, and V. Vaishampayan. Characterizing interactive behavior in a large-scale operational IPTV environment. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Ito and S. Tasaka. Quantitative assessment of user-level QoS and its mapping. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia, 7 Issue 3:572--584, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-12. "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures", Sept 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ITU-T Recommendation P.911. "Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia applications" Dec 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Klaue, B. Rathke, and A. Wolisz. EvalVid - A framework for video transmission and quality evaluation. In Computer Performance, volume 2794 of LNCS, pages 255--272. Springer, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jannotti, and M. F. Kaashoek. The click modular router. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 18(3):263--297, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Mok, E. Chan, and R. Chang. Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming. In Proc. IEEE/IFIP IM (pre-conf.), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. J. D. Nagelkerke. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78 Issue 3:691--692, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Perkis, S. Munkeby, and O. Hillestad. A model for measuring quality of experience. In Proc. NORSIG, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. Sani and J. Todman. Experimental Design and Statistics For Psychology: A First Course. Blackwell, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Siller and J. Woods. Using an agent based platform to map quality of service to experience in conventional and active networks. IEE Proc. - Communications, 153(6):828--840, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Vilas, X. Paneda, R. Garcia, D. Melendi, and V. Garcia. User behavior analysis of a video-on-demand service with a wide variety of subjects and lengths. In Proc. EUROMICRO, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. W. Wu, A. Arefin, R. Rivas, K. Nahrstedt, R. Sheppard, and Z. Yang. Quality of experience in distributed interactive multimedia environments: toward a theoretical framework. In Proc. ACM MM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. H. Yu, D. Zheng, B. Y. Zhao, and W. Zheng. Understanding user behavior in large-scale video-on-demand systems. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 40:333--344, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Inferring the QoE of HTTP video streaming from user-viewing activities

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        W-MUST '11: Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Measurements up the stack
        August 2011
        74 pages
        ISBN:9781450308007
        DOI:10.1145/2018602

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader