skip to main content
10.1145/2019136.2019159acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Small inexpensive core asset construction for large gainful product line development: developing a communication system firmware product line

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Product line development of communication system firmware with more than 2,000 features was performed in a large-scale project that involved more than 300 engineers (at a maximum) across four distributed sites. However, since intense demands to reduce development costs and time made it prohibitive to construct core assets for all those identified features, the project screened a limited number of the features, for which core assets were constructed, and then performed partial application of product line engineering. Nevertheless, when compared with previously engineered derivative developments, when the second product of the product line was released, it was clear that the project had achieved significant improvements in quality, as well as reductions in development costs and time requirements. Automatic code generation also contributed to those improvements.

References

  1. Paul Clements and Linda Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practice and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Frank van der Linden. Software Product Families in Europe: The Esaps and Café Projects. IEEE Software, 9(4):41--49, July/August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Takashi Iwasaki, Makoto Uchiba, Jun Ohtsuka, Koji Hachiya, Tsuneo Nakanishi, Kenji Hisazumi, and Akira Fukuda. An Experience Report of Introducing Product Line Engineering across the Board. Proc. 14th Int. Software Product Line Conf. (SPLC) 2010, 2:255--258, September 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lisa Brownsword and Paul Clements. A Case Study in Successful Prooduct Line Development. CMU/SEI-96-TR-016, Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, September 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. C. Kang, S. G. Cohen, J. A. Hess, W. E. Novak, and A. S. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, November 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. K. C. Kang, Jaejoon Lee, and Patrick Donohoe. Feature-Oriented Product Line Engineering. IEEE Software, 9(4):58--65, July/August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Small inexpensive core asset construction for large gainful product line development: developing a communication system firmware product line

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SPLC '11: Proceedings of the 15th International Software Product Line Conference, Volume 2
          August 2011
          306 pages
          ISBN:9781450307895
          DOI:10.1145/2019136

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 August 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate167of463submissions,36%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader