skip to main content
10.1145/2030112.2030133acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Haptic reassurance in the pitch black for an immersive theatre experience

Published:17 September 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

An immersive theatre experience was designed to raise awareness and question perceptions of 'blindness', through enabling both sighted and blind members to experience a similar reality. A multimodal experience was created, comprising ambient sounds and narratives -- heard through headphones -- and an assortment of themed tactile objects, intended to be felt. In addition, audience members were each provided with a novel haptic device that was designed to enhance their discovery of a pitch-black space. An in the wild study of the cultural experience showed how blind and sighted audience members had different 'felt' experiences, but that neither was a lesser one. Furthermore, the haptic device was found to encourage enactive exploration and provide reassurance of the environment for both sighted and blind people, rather than acting simply as a navigation guide. We discuss the potential of using haptic feedback to create cultural experiences for both blind and sighted people; rethinking current utilitarian framing of it as assistive technology.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

4-2.mov

mov

38.8 MB

References

  1. Amemyia, T., Sugiyama, H. Haptic handheld wayfinder with pseudo-attraction force for pedestrians with visual impairments. In Proc. Assets '09: Computers and accessibility, (2009), 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C.C., Saunders, F.A., White, B. and Scadden, L. Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection, Nature, 221 (1969) 963--964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B. and Rodden, T. From Interaction to Trajectories: Designing Coherent Journeys Through User Experiences. In Proc. CHI'09 (2009), ACM, 709--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bird, J., Marshall, P. and Rogers, Y. Low-Fi Skin Vision: A Case Study in Rapid Prototyping a Sensory Substitution System. In Proc. HCI'09 (2009), 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cassinelli, A., Reynolds, C. and Ishikawa, M. Augmenting Spatial Awareness with Haptic Radar. In Proc IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, (2006), 61--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chrisley, R. Froese, T. and Spiers, A. Engineering Conceptual Change: The Enactive Torch. Abstract of talk given November 11th, 2008, at the Royal Academy of Engineering, Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. van Erp, J., van Veen, H., Jansen, C. and Dobbins, T. Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Transactions Applied Perception, Vol. 2, (2005), 106--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. FeelSpace. http://feelspace.cogsci.uni-osnabrueck.de/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Grespan, L., Froese, T., Di Paolo, E.A., Seth, A. K., Spiers, A. and Bigge, W. Investigating the role of movement in the constitution of spatial perception using the Enactive Torch. In ENACTIVE08, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. HaptiMap, Haptic, Audio and Visual Interfaces for Maps and Location Based Services, at http://www.haptimap.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Howell, C. and Porter, D. Re-Assessing Practice: Visual Art, Visually Impaired People And The Web. Proc. Museums and the Web, (2003). Downloaded from http://www.archimuse.com/mw2003/papers/howell.howell.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Iannacci, F., Turnquist, E., Avrahami, D., and Patel. S.N. The haptic laser: multi-sensation tactile feedback for at-a-distance physical space perception and interaction. In Proc. CHI'11 (2011) ACM, 2047--2050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. vom Lehn, D. Discovering 'Experience-ables': Socially including visually impaired people in art museums, J. of Marketing Management, (2010) 26: 7, 749--769.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lopez, M. J. and Pauletto, S. The Design of an Audio Film For the Visually Impaired. In Proc. 15th International Conference on Auditory Display, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaklanis, N., Tzovaras, D and Moustakas, K. Haptic Navigation in the World Wide Web. Universal access in human-computer interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, Volume 5616 (2009) 707--715. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Magee, B. and Milligan, M. On Blindness: Letters between Bryan Magee and Martin Milligan. Oxford University Press (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maravita, A. and Iriki, A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (2004), Vol. 8: 79--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Momo, by Che-wei Wang and Kristin O'Friel. Downloaded from http://www.kofriel.com/momo/index.ph.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Parry, N., Bendon, H., Boyd Davis, S. and Moar, M. Scratch: Video Documentation of Translocational Radio Drama, In Adjunct Proc. Pervasive 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pielot, M. and Boll, S., Tactile Wayfinder: Comparison of Tactile Waypoint Navigation with Commercial pedestrian navigation Systems. In Proc. Pervasive Computing, LNCS (2010), 76--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. O'Regan, J. K. and Noë, A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2001), 24: 939--973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Reid, J., Hull, R., Cater, K. and Fleuriot, C. Magic moments in situated mediascapes. In ACE '05, Proc. Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, (2005), 290--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Harris, E., Phelps, T., Price, S., Smith, H., Muller, H., Randall, C., Moss, A., Taylor, I., Stanton, D., O'Malley, C., Corke, G. and Gabrielli, S. (2002) Things aren't what they seem to be: innovation through technology inspiration. In Proc. DIS'02, 373--379. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Saerberg, S. The Dining In the Dark Phenomenon, RELOADED Disability Studies Quarterly, (2007), Vol. 27, No.3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. The Question, Website for the Immersive Theatre Experience project, accessed June 2011, http://www.thequestion.org.uk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, J., Walker, B., Lindsay, J., Cambias, C. and Dellaert, F. Swan: System for wearable audio navigation. In Proc. Int. Conference on Wearable Computing, IEEE Computer Society, (2007), 91--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Haptic reassurance in the pitch black for an immersive theatre experience

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '11: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
      September 2011
      668 pages
      ISBN:9781450306300
      DOI:10.1145/2030112

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 September 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader