skip to main content
research-article

A holistic approach to aesthetic enhancement of photographs

Published:04 November 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article presents an interactive application that enables users to improve the visual aesthetics of their digital photographs using several novel spatial recompositing techniques. This work differs from earlier efforts in two important aspects: (1) it focuses on both photo quality assessment and improvement in an integrated fashion, (2) it enables the user to make informed decisions about improving the composition of a photograph. The tool facilitates interactive selection of one or more than one foreground objects present in a given composition, and the system presents recommendations for where it can be relocated in a manner that optimizes a learned aesthetic metric while obeying semantic constraints. For photographic compositions that lack a distinct foreground object, the tool provides the user with crop or expansion recommendations that improve the aesthetic appeal by equalizing the distribution of visual weights between semantically different regions. The recomposition techniques presented in the article emphasize learning support vector regression models that capture visual aesthetics from user data and seek to optimize this metric iteratively to increase the image appeal. The tool demonstrates promising aesthetic assessment and enhancement results on variety of images and provides insightful directions towards future research.

References

  1. Avidan, S. and Shamir, A. 2007. Seam carving for content-aware image resizing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boutell, M. and Luo, J. 2004. Bayesian fusion of camera metadata cues in semantic scene classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cho, T. S., Butman, M., Avidan, S., and Freeman, W. T. 2008. The patch transform and its applications to image editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., and Wang, J. Z. 2006. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Datta, R., Li, J., and Wang, J. Z. 2007. Learning the consensus on visual quality for next-generation image management. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. 2004. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hoiem, D., Efros, A., and Hebert, M. 2007. Recovering surface layout from an image. Int. J.Comput Vis. 75, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Joachims, T. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jonas, P. 1976. Photographic Composition Simplified. Amphoto Publishers. 2, 6, 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ke, Y., Tang, X., and Jing, F. 2006. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Leyvand, T., Cohen-Or, D., Dror, G., and Lischinski, D. 2008. Data-driven enhancement of facial attractiveness. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Liu, C., Szeliski, R., Kang, S. B., Zitnick, C. L., and Freeman, W. T. 2008. Automatic estimation and removal of noise from a single image. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intel. 30, 299--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Livio, M. 2002. The golden ratio and aesthetics. Plus Mag. Living Math.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo, Y. and Tang, X. 2008. Photo and video quality evaluation: Focusing on the subject. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mansoor, A., Haider, M., Mian, A., and Khan, S. 2009. A hybrid image quality measure for automatic image quality assessment. In Proceedings of the Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nishiyama, M., Okabe, T., Sato, Y., and Sato, I. 2009. Sensation-based photo cropping. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. 669--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sun, X., Yao, H., Ji, R., and Liu, S. 2009. Photo assessment based on computational visual attention model. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. 541--544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Venkata, N. D., Kite, T. D., Geisler, W. S., Evans, B. L., and Bovik, A. C. 2000. Image quality assessment based on a degradation model. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Walther, D. and Koch, C. 2006. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks 19, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. You, J., Perkis, A., Hannuksela, M., and Gabbouj, M. 2009. Perceptual quality assessment based on visual attention analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhang, Y., Xiao, J., and Shah, M. 2004. Region completion in single image. In Proceedings of EUROGRAPHICS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A holistic approach to aesthetic enhancement of photographs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
      ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 7S, Issue 1
      Special section on ACM multimedia 2010 best paper candidates, and issue on social media
      October 2011
      246 pages
      ISSN:1551-6857
      EISSN:1551-6865
      DOI:10.1145/2037676
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 November 2011
      • Accepted: 1 September 2011
      • Revised: 1 August 2011
      • Received: 1 March 2011
      Published in tomm Volume 7S, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader