skip to main content
10.1145/2043556.2043589acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessospConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pervasive detection of process races in deployed systems

Published:23 October 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Process races occur when multiple processes access shared operating system resources, such as files, without proper synchronization. We present the first study of real process races and the first system designed to detect them. Our study of hundreds of applications shows that process races are numerous, difficult to debug, and a real threat to reliability. To address this problem, we created RacePro, a system for automatically detecting these races. RacePro checks deployed systems in-vivo by recording live executions then deterministically replaying and checking them later. This approach increases checking coverage beyond the configurations or executions covered by software vendors or beta testing sites. RacePro records multiple processes, detects races in the recording among system calls that may concurrently access shared kernel objects, then tries different execution orderings of such system calls to determine which races are harmful and result in failures. To simplify race detection, RacePro models under-specified system calls based on load and store micro-operations. To reduce false positives and negatives, RacePro uses a replay and go-live mechanism to distill harmful races from benign ones. We have implemented RacePro in Linux, shown that it imposes only modest recording overhead, and used it to detect a number of previously unknown bugs in real applications caused by process races.

References

  1. All resource races studied. http://rcs.cs.columbia.edu/projects/racepro/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Launchpad Software Collaboration Platform. https://launchpad.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. The Debian Almquist Shell. http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Upstart: an Event-Based Replacement for System V Init Scripts. http://upstart.ubuntu.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Aviram, S.-C. Weng, S. Hu, and B. Ford. Efficient System-Enforced Deterministic Parallelism. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '10), Oct. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Bergan, N. Hunt, L. Ceze, and S. D. Gribble. Deterministic Process Groups in dOS. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '10), Oct. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Chow, T. Garfinkel, and P. M. Chen. Decoupling Dynamic Program Analysis from Execution in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX '08), June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Chu, C. Murphy, and G. Kaiser. Distributed In Vivo Testing of Software Applications. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation (ICST '08), Apr. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Cui, J. Wu, C.-C. Tsai, and J. Yang. Stable Deterministic Multithreading through Schedule Memoization. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '10), Oct. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. W. Dunlap, D. G. Lucchetti, M. A. Fetterman, and P. M. Chen. Execution Replay of Multiprocessor Virtual Machines. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments (VEE '08), Mar. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. Engler and K. Ashcraft. RacerX: Effective, Static Detection of Race Conditions and Deadlocks. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '03), Oct. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. Flanagan and P. Godefroid. Dynamic Partial-Order Reduction for Model Checking Software. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL '05), Jan. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Fonseca, C. Li, and R. Rodrigues. Finding Complex Concurrency Bugs in Large Multi-Threaded Applications. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (EUROSYS '11), Apr. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Q. Gao, W. Zhang, Z. Chen, M. Zheng, and F. Qin. 2ndStrike: Towards Manifesting Hidden Concurrency Typestate Bugs. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Architecture Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS '11), Mar. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Z. Guo, X. Wang, J. Tang, X. Liu, Z. Xu, M. Wu, M. F. Kaashoek, and Z. Zhang. R2: An Application-Level Kernel for Record and Replay. In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '08), Dec. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. O. Laadan, C.-C. Tsai, N. Viennot, C. Blinn, P. S. Du, J. Yang, and J. Nieh. Finding Concurrency Errors in Sequential Code---OS-level, In-vivo Model Checking of Process Races. In Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HOTOS '11), May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. O. Laadan, N. Viennot, and J. Nieh. Transparent, Lightweight Application Execution Replay on Commodity Multiprocessor Operating Systems. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS '10), June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Lamport. Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System. Comm. ACM, 21(7):558--565, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. J. LeBlanc and J. M. Mellor-Crummey. Debugging Parallel Programs with Instant Replay. IEEE Trans. Comput., 36(4):471--482, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Lu, S. Park, E. Seo, and Y. Zhou. Learning from Mistakes: a Comprehensive Study on Real World Concurrency Bug Characteristics. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Architecture Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS '08), Mar. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Lu, J. Tucek, F. Qin, and Y. Zhou. AVIO: Detecting Atomicity Violations via Access Interleaving Invariants. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Architecture Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS '06), Oct. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. F. Mattern. Dynamic Partial-Order Reduction for Model Checking Software. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL '05), Oct. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Musuvathi, S. Qadeer, T. Ball, G. Basler, P. A. Nainar, and I. Neamtiu. Finding and Reproducing Heisenbugs in Concurrent Programs. In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '08), Dec. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Naik, A. Aiken, and J. Whaley. Effective Static Race Detection For Java. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2006 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI '06), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Narayanasamy, Z. Wang, J. Tigani, A. Edwards, and B. Calder. Automatically Classifying Benign and Harmful Data Racesallusing Replay Analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2007 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI '07), June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. E. B. Nightingale, D. Peek, P. M. Chen, and J. Flinn. Parallelizing Security Checks on Commodity Hardware. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Architecture Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS '08), Mar. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. S. Osman, D. Subhraveti, G. Su, and J. Nieh. The Design and Implementation of Zap: A System for Migrating Computing Environments. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '02), Dec. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. E. Porter, O. S. Hofmann, C. J. Rossbach, A. Benn, and E. Witchel. Operating System Transactions. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '09), Oct. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. P. Quigley, J. Sipek, C. P. Wright, and E. Zadok. UnionFS: User- and Community-oriented Development of a Unification Filesystem. In Proceedings of the 2006 Linux Symposium, July 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. K. Sen. Race Directed Random Testing of Concurrent Programs. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2008 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI '08), June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. M. Srinivasan, S. Kandula, C. R. Andrews, and Y. Zhou. Flashback: A Lightweight Extension for Rollback and Deterministic Replay for Software Debugging. In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX '04), June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. D. Tsafrir, T. Hertz, D. Wagner, and D. Da Silva. Portably Solving File TOCTTOU Races with Hardness Amplification. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '08), Feb. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. E. Tsyrklevich and B. Yee. Dynamic Detection and Prevention of Race Conditions in File Accesses. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. University of California at Berkeley. Open-Source Software for Volunteer Computing and Grid Computing. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. J. Wei and C. Pu. TOCTTOU Vulnerabilities in UNIX-Style File Systems: an Anatomical Study. In Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '05), Dec. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. Wu, H. Cui, and J. Yang. Bypassing Races in Live Applications with Execution Filters. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '10), Oct. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. M. Yabandeh, N. Knezevic, D. Kostic, and V. Kuncak. CrystalBall: Predicting and Preventing Inconsistencies in Deployed Distributed Systems. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '09), Apr. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Y. Yu, T. Rodeheffer, and W. Chen. RaceTrack: Efficient Detection of Data Race Conditions via Adaptive Tracking. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP '05), Oct. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. M. Zalewski. Delivering Signals for Fun and Profit. Bindview Corporation, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. W. Zhang, J. Lim, R. Olichandran, J. Scherpelz, G. Jin, S. Lu, and T. Reps. ConSeq: Detecting Concurrency Bugs through Sequential Errors. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Architecture Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS '11), Mar. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Pervasive detection of process races in deployed systems

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  SOSP '11: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles
                  October 2011
                  417 pages
                  ISBN:9781450309776
                  DOI:10.1145/2043556

                  Copyright © 2011 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 23 October 2011

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate131of716submissions,18%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  SOSP '24

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader