Alessandro Finamore
Marco Mellia
ABSTRACT
In this paper we present a complete measurement study that compares YouTube traffic generated by mobile devices (smart-phones,tablets) with traffic generated by common PCs (desktops, notebooks, netbooks). We investigate the users' behavior and correlate it with the system performance. Our measurements are performed using unique data sets which are collected from vantage points in nation-wide ISPs and University campuses from two countries in Europe and the U.S.
Our results show that the user access patterns are similar across a wide range of user locations, access technologies and user devices. Users stick with default player configurations, e.g., not changing video resolution or rarely enabling full screen playback. Furthermore it is very common that users abort video playback, with 60% of videos watched for no more than 20% of their duration.
We show that the YouTube system is highly optimized for PC access and leverages aggressive buffering policies to guarantee excellent video playback. This however causes 25%-39% of data to be unnecessarily transferred, since users abort the playback very early. This waste of data transferred is even higher when mobile devices are considered. The limited storage offered by those devices makes the video download more complicated and overall less efficient, so that clients typically download more data than the actual video size. Overall, this result calls for better system optimization for both, PC and mobile accesses.
- V. K. Adhikari, S. Jain, and Z.-L. Zhang. YouTube Traffic Dynamics and its Interplay with a Tier-1 ISP: an ISP Perspective. In IMC'10: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pages 431--443, Melbourne, Australia, 2010. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Alcock and R. Nelson. Application Flow Control in YouTube Video Streams. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 41:24--30, April 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Cha, H. Kwak, P. Rodriguez, Y.-Y. Ahn, and S. Moon. I Tube, You Tube, Everybody Tubes: Analyzing The World's Largest User Generated Content Video System. In IMC'07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pages 1--14, San Diego, California, USA, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Cheng, C. Dale, and J. Liu. Statistics and Social Network of YouTube Videos. In IWQoS'08: 16th International Workshop on Quality of Service, pages 229--238, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2008.Google Scholar
- A. Finamore, M. Mellia, M. Meo, M. M. Munafò, and D. Rossi. Experiences of Internet Traffic Monitoring with Tstat. IEEE Network, 25(3):8--14, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Gember, A. Anand, and A. Akella. A Comparative Study of Handheld and Non-Handheld Traffic in Campus Wi-Fi Networks. In PAM'11: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Passive and Active Measurement, pages 173--183, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Gill, M. Arlitt, Z. Li, and A. Mahanti. YouTube Traffic Characterization: A View From The Edge. In IMC'07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Internet Measurement Conference, pages 15--28, San Diego, California, USA, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Labovitz, S. Iekel-Johnson, D. McPherson, J. Oberheide, and F. Jahanian. Internet Inter-Domain Traffic. In SIGCOMM'10: Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pages 75--86, New Delhi, India, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Maier, F. Schneider, and A. Feldmann. A First Look at Mobile Hand-Held Device Traffic. In PAM'10: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Passive and Active Measurement, pages 161--170, Zurich, Switzerland, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- The Mobile Internet Report. http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/mobile_internet_report122009.html.Google Scholar
- M. Saxena, U. Sharan, and S. Fahmy. Analyzing Video Services in Web 2.0: a Global Perspective. In NOSSDAV'08: Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video, pages 39--44, Braunschweig, Germany, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Z. Shafiq, L. Ji, A. X. Liu, and J. Wang. Characterizing and Modeling Internet Traffic Dynamics of Cellular Devices. In SIGMETRICS'11: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 305--316, San Jose, California, USA, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Torres, A. Finamore, J. R. Kim, M. Mellia, M. M. Munafò, and S. G. Rao. Dissecting Video Server Selection Strategies in the YouTube CDN. In ICDCS'11: Proceedings of the 31th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 248--257, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tstat Home Page. http://tstat.polito.it.Google Scholar
- YouTube Blog: Mmm mmm good - YouTube videos now served in WebM. http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2011/04/mmm-mmm-good-youtube-videos-now-served.html.Google Scholar
- YouTube Press Room, www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics.Google Scholar
- M. Zink, K. Suh, Y. Gu, and J. Kurose. Characteristics of YouTube Network Traffic at a Campus Network - Measurements, Models, and Implications. Computer Networks, 53(4):501--514, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- YouTube everywhere: impact of device and infrastructure synergies on user experience
Recommendations
Energy Consumption of Mobile YouTube: Quantitative Measurement and Analysis
NGMAST '08: Proceedings of the 2008 The Second International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services, and TechnologiesYouTube launched a customized website for mobile devices, which is gaining popularity among users. However, accessing multimedia based Internet services from mobile devices consumes energy, the most critical resource of handheld devices. The energy ...
Video streaming to mobile handheld devices: challenges in decoding, adaptation, and browsing
MCAM'07: Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Multimedia content analysis and miningGrowing popularity and richer functionality of contemporary mobile handheld devices such as PDAs and smart phones have enabled emerging video streaming applications to these devices via various wireless networks. However, these handheld devices are ...
Pippi Longstocking calculus for temporal stimuli pattern on YouTube QoE: 1+1=3 and 1·4≠4·1
MoVid '13: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Mobile VideoVideo streaming over wireless broadband is currently accounting for half of the world-wide mobile data traffic, and its share is expected to increase even further. As a consequence, mobile operators need to understand how Quality of Experience (QoE) of ...
Comments