skip to main content
10.1145/2078827.2078843acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoupsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Privacy: is there an app for that?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 July 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Users of social networking sites (SNSs) increasingly must learn to negotiate privacy online with multiple service providers. Facebook's third-party applications (apps) add an additional layer of complexity and confusion for users seeking to understand and manage their privacy. We conducted a novel exploratory survey (conducted on Facebook as a Platform app) to measure how Facebook app users interact with apps, what they understand about how apps access and exchange their profile information, and how these factors relate to their privacy concerns. In our analysis, we paid special attention to our most knowledgeable respondents: given their expertise, would they differ in behaviors or attitudes from less knowledgeable respondents? We found that misunderstandings and confusion abound about how apps function and how they manage profile data. Against our expectations, knowledge or behavior weren't consistent predictors of privacy concerns with third-party apps or on SNSs in general. Instead, whether or not the respondent experienced an adverse privacy event on a social networking site was a reliable predictor of privacy attitudes.

References

  1. Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. 2006. Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook. Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barnes, S. B. 2006. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday. 11, 9 (2006), 11--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Besmer, A. and Lipford, H. R. 2010. Users' (mis)conceptions of social applications. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 2010), 63--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Besmer, A., Lipford, H. R., Shehab, M. and Cheek, G. 2009. Social applications: exploring a more secure framework. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 2:1--2:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Besmer, A., Watson, J. and Lipford, H. R. 2010. The impact of social navigation on privacy policy configuration. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 7:1--7:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. boyd, d. and Hargittai, E. 2010. Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday; Volume 15, Number 8--2 August 2010. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain, J., Scott, D. and Akers, P. 2009. Pharmacy students' Facebook activity and opinions regarding accountability and e-professionalism. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 73, 6 (Oct. 2009), 104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Christofides, E., Muise, A. and Desmarais, S. 2009. Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior. 12, 3 (2009), 341--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Conti, G. and Sobiesk, E. 2007. An honest man has nothing to fear: user perceptions on web-based information disclosure. Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Usable privacy and security (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 112--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A. K. and Hughes, B. N. 2009. Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 15, 1 (2009), 83--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kelley, P. G., Bresee, J., Cranor, L. F. and Reeder, R. 2009. A "nutrition label" for privacy. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 4:1--1:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kolesnikova, E., Gunther, O. and Krasnova, H. 2009. "It Won't Happen To Me!": Self-Disclosure in Online Social Networks. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings. (Jan. 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Krasnova, H., Gunther, O., Spiekermann, S. and Koroleva, K. 2009. Privacy concerns and identity in online social networks. Identity in the Information Society. 2, 1 (2009), 39--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J. and Christakis, N. 2008. The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 14, 1 (2008), 79--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. McCarthy, Caroline. 2009. Facebook app privacy: It's complicated. CNET.com. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10420499-36.html. Accesssed: 3-11-2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Raynes-Goldie, Katie. 2010. Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday; Volume 15, Number 1--4 January 2010. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Steel, E. and Fowler, G. Facebook in Online Privacy Breach; Applications Transmitting Identifying Information, WSJ.com. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304772804575558484075236968.html. Accessed: 12-13-2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stutzman, F., Capra, R. and Thompson, J. 2011. Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior. 27, 1 (2011), 590--598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tufekci, Z. 2008. Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 28, 1 (2008), 20--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Westin, A. 2001. Opinion surveys: What consumers have to say about information privacy. Prepared Witness Testimony, The House Committee on Energy and Commerce, WJ Billy Tauzin, Chairman. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Privacy: is there an app for that?

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Gopal K. Gupta

        Individuals voluntarily provide a vast amount of personal information to Facebook and other social networking sites. The privacy concerns of users is an interesting area of research to study. Earlier research suggests that there is often little correlation between an individual's online privacy concerns and his or her disclosure of personal information. This study reports on the relationship between an individual's privacy concerns and his or her knowledge and use of third-party apps on Facebook. In 2010, the authors conducted a 60-question survey that was delivered as a Facebook app. In addition, they collected data from each respondent's profile in order to measure how much personal information people are willing to share. The survey was viewed 816 times; 516 usable responses were collected. Not all of the responses came from app users. About half of the respondents did not understand that an app has access not only to the user's profile information, but also to the user's Facebook friends' profile information. The study explores the respondents' attitudes toward privacy-risky practices by third-party apps, interpersonal privacy risks on Facebook, and institutional privacy risks. Bivariate analysis and regression analysis were used to analyze the survey data. The authors found that some respondents trust their friends and Facebook with their personal information, although "adverse privacy events have a significant influence on application disclosure attitudes." Furthermore, the respondents reacted negatively to those app developers who distribute users' personal information to others. No "predictors associated with third-party app privacy attitudes" were discovered. It appears as though there is "too little awareness ... of what apps are, how they work, and the kinds of threats they pose to privacy." In summary, the authors found that there is a lack of correlation between privacy concerns and behavior. The authors note that this was not a rigorous, in-depth analysis since random sampling was not used to select the respondents. While the findings are not particularly surprising, they reinforce the view that Facebook users are willing to provide personal information without having a good understanding of how apps may use it. This paper will be of interest to readers who want to learn about the privacy risks associated with apps that access and exchange users'-and perhaps their friends'-profile information. Online Computing Reviews Service

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SOUPS '11: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security
          July 2011
          253 pages
          ISBN:9781450309110
          DOI:10.1145/2078827

          Copyright © 2011 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 July 2011

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate15of49submissions,31%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader