skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145347acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Policy makers are calling for new socio-economic measures that reflect subjective well-being, to complement traditional measures of material welfare as the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Self-reporting has been found to be reasonably accurate in measuring one's well-being and conveniently tallies with sentiment expressed on social media (e.g., those satisfied with life use more positive than negative words in their Facebook status updates). Social media content can thus be used to track well-being of individuals. A question left unexplored is whether such content can be used to track well-being of entire physical communities as well. To this end, we consider Twitter users based in a variety of London census communities, and study the relationship between sentiment expressed in tweets and community socio-economic well-being. We find that the two are highly correlated: the higher the normalized sentiment score of a community's tweets, the higher the community's socio-economic well-being. This suggests that monitoring tweets is an effective way of tracking community well-being too.

References

  1. L. Barbosa and J. Feng. Robust sentiment detection on Twitter from biased and noisy data. In Proc. of the 23rd COLING, August 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Butcher. London is the capital of Twitter, says founder. TechCrunch Europe, August 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Diener, M. Diener, and C. Diener. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5):851--864, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Dolan, T. Peasgood, and M. White. Do we really know what makes us happy? Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1):94--122, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. Eagle, M. Macy, and R. Claxton. Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981):1029--1031, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. Go, R. Bhayani, and L. Huang. Twitter Sentiment Classification using Distant Supervision. In Stanford Tech Report, December 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Irvine. Twitter CEO dismisses claims that social networking 'dehumanises'. The Telegraph, August 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. Kivran-Swaine and M. Naaman. Network properties and social sharing of emotions in social awareness streams. In Proc. of the ACM CSCW, March 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Kramer. An unobtrusive behavioral model of "Gross National Happiness". In Proc. of the 28th ACM CHI, April 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Lanier. You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. Knopf, January 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Noble et al. The English Indices of Deprivation 2007. The Department of Communities and Local Government, March 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Ramage, S. Dumais, and D. Liebling. Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models. In Proc. of the AAAI ICWSM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Stratton. Happiness index to gauge Britain's national mood. The Guardian, November 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 2012
      1460 pages
      ISBN:9781450310864
      DOI:10.1145/2145204

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 February 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader