Julian Kupiec
- 1.E B. Baxendale. Man-made index for technical literature - an experiment. IBM J. Res. Develop., 2(4):354-361, 1958.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.ER. Chen and M.M. Withgott. The use of emphasis to automatically summarize a spoken discourse. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intl. Conf. on Acoust., Speech and Signal Proc., volume 1, pages 229-232, March 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3.G. DeJong. An overview of the FRUMP system. In W.G. Lehnert and M. H. Ringle, editors, Strategies for Natural Language Parsing, pages 149-176, 1982.Google Scholar
- 4.H. R FBmundson. New methods in automatic abstracting. Journal of the A CM, 16(2):264-285, April 1969. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.RS. Jacobs and L. F. Rau. Scisor: Extracting information from on-line news. Communications of the ACM, 33(11):88-97, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.K. Sparck Jones. Discourse modelling for automatic summarising. Technical Report 29D, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
- 7.H.R Luhn. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J. Res. Develop., 2:159-165, 1959.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.S. Miike, E. Itoh, K. Ono, and K. Sumita. A full-text retrieval system with a dynamic abstract generation function. In W. Bruce Croft and C.J. van Rijsbergen, editors, Proceedings of Seventeenth Annual International A CM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 152-161, July 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.A.H. Morris, G. M. Kasper, and D. A. Adams. The effects and limitations of automated text condensing on reading comprehension performance. Information Systems Research, pages 17-35, March 1992.Google Scholar
- 10.C. D. Palce. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: Techniques and prospects. Information Processing and Management, 26:171-t 86, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.C. D. Paice and P. A. Jones. The identification of important concepts in highly structured technical papers. In R. Korfhage, E. Rasmussen, and P. Willett, editors, Proceedings of Sixteenth Annual international A CM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 69- 78. ACM Press. June 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.G. J. Rath, A. Resnick, and T. R. Savage. The formation of abstracts by the selection of sentences. American Documentation, 12(2):139-143, April 1961.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13.U. Reimer and U. Hahn. Text condensation as knowledge base abstraction. In IEEE Conf_ on AI Applicauons. pages 338- 344, 1988.Google Scholar
- 14.G. Salton, J. Alan, and C. Buckley. Approaches to passage retrieval in full text information systems. In Proceedings of SIGIR'93, pages 49-58, June 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.G. Salton, J. Allan, C. Buckley, and A. Singhal. Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machinereadable texts. Science, 264(3):1421-1426, June 1994.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 16.C. Schwarz. Content based text handling. Information Processing & Management, 26(2):219-226, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.E. E Skorokhod'ko. Adaptive method of automatic abstracting and indexing. In IFIP Congress, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia 71, pages 1179-1182. North Holland, 1972.Google Scholar
- 18.J.I. Tait. Generating summaries using a script-based language analyzer. In L. Steels and J.A. Campbell, editors, Progress in Artificial Intelligence, pages 312-318. Ellis Horwood, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.L. C. Tong and S. L. Tan. A statistical approach to automatic text extraction. Asian Library Journal.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A trainable document summarizer
Recommendations
A query-based multi-document sentiment summarizer
CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge managementReview websites, such as Epinions.com, which offer users a platform to share their opinions on diverse products and services, provide a valuable source of opinion-rich information. Browsing through archived reviews to locate different opinions on a ...
Text summarization using a trainable summarizer and latent semantic analysis
Special issue: An Asian digital libraries perspectiveThis paper proposes two approaches to address text summarization: modified corpus-based approach (MCBA) and LSA-based T.R.M. approach (LSA + T.R.M.). The first is a trainable summarizer, which takes into account several features, including position, ...
A compositional context sensitive multi-document summarizer: exploring the factors that influence summarization
SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrievalThe usual approach for automatic summarization is sentence extraction, where key sentences from the input documents are selected based on a suite of features. While word frequency often is used as a feature in summarization, its impact on system ...
Comments