skip to main content
article
Free Access

Design rules based on analyses of human error

Published:01 April 1983Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

By analyzing the classes of errors that people make with systems, it is possible to develop principles of system design that minimize both the occurrence of error and the effects. This paper demonstrates some of these principles through the analysis of one class of errors: slips of action. Slips are defined to be situations in which the user's intention was proper, but the results did not conform to that intention. Many properties of existing systems are conducive to slips; from the classification of these errors, some procedures to minimize the occurrence of slips are developed.

References

  1. 1 Card, S., Moran, T., and Newell, A. Applied Information-Processing Psychology: The Human-Computer Interface. Er}baum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Gentner, D. The Structure of Analogical Models in Science: Technical Report 4451. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Mass, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. (Eds.), Mental Models. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Lockheed Missiles and Space Company. Human factors review of nuclear power plant control room design. EPRI NP-309-SY. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Aircraft incident report: Aero Mexico DC-10-30, XA-DUH over Luxembourg, Europe, November 11, 1979. (NTSB-AAR-80-10). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., November, 1980. (Report available from National Technical Information Service.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Special investigation report: Design-induced landing gear retraction accidents in Beech Baron, Bonanza, and other light aircraft. (NTSB-SR-80-1). National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., June, 1980. (Report available from National Technical Information Service.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Norman, D. A. Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1981, 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9 Norman, D. A. A psychologist views human processing: Human errors and other phenomena suggest processing mechanisms. Invited address, published in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Norman, D. A. How to make computer systems that people will like to use: Steps toward a cognitive engineering. Proceedings of the Western Electronic Show and Convention (Wescon/82). Anaheim, California, Sept. 15, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Norman, D. A. Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Norman, D. A. and Bobrow, D. G. Descriptions: An intermediate stage in memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 1979, 107-123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. 13 Schneider, M. L., Wexelblat, R. L., and Jende, M. S. Designing control languages from the user's perspective. In D. Beech (Ed.), Command Language Directions: Proceedings of the IFIP TC 2.7 Working Conference on Command Languages. North-Holland Publishing Co., New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Smith, D. C., Irby, C., Kimball, R., and Verplank, B. Designing the star user interface. Byte 7, 4 (April 1982), 242-282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Teitelman, W. and Masinter, L. The Interlisp programming environment. Computer 14, 4 (April 1981), 25-33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design rules based on analyses of human error

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Communications of the ACM
        Communications of the ACM  Volume 26, Issue 4
        April 1983
        68 pages
        ISSN:0001-0782
        EISSN:1557-7317
        DOI:10.1145/2163
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 1983 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 1983

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader