Teresa D. Gilbertson
ABSTRACT
Accessible websites are increasingly desired by clients with many web developers listing accessibility as a skill offered by their companies. An accessibility and validation study of 100 UK web development company homepages found that, while the skill set is gaining popularity in terms of visibility, the mention of accessibility on a developer website has no impact in terms of the actual accessibility of the homepage. The presence of validation and conformance icons for XHTML, CSS, WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 also does not necessarily reflect the current state of the site, which may have changed multiple times since the validation occurred. Accessibility errors are still common, with missing alt text and labels and poor keyboard accessibility in terms of keyboard traps as well as omission of "lang" attributes and reused id attribute values listed among the most frequent barriers encountered.
- Disability Rights Commission. 2004. The Web Access and Inclusion for Disabled People A Formal Investigation.Google Scholar
- England, R. Flash tabbing and focus solution http://www.discombo.co.uk/new/flashfocus/.Google Scholar
- Freire, A. P., Russo, C. M. and Fortes, R. P. M. 2008. A survey on the accessibility awareness of people involved in web development projects in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), Beijing, China, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 87--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hackett, S., Parmanto, B. and Zeng, X. Number 6/November-December 2005. A retrospective look at website accessibility over time. Behaviour and Information Technology 24, 407--417(11).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A. and Greenidge, K. 2004. Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior 20, 269--288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lazar, J. and Greenidge, K. 2006. One year older, but not necessarily wiser: an evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time. Univers.Access Inf.Soc. 4, 285--291. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lopes, R., Van Isacker, K. and Carricco, L. 2010. Redefining assumptions: accessibility and its stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computers helping people with special needs: Part I, Vienna, Austria, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 561--568. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olalere, A. and Lazar, J. 2011. Accessibility of U. S. federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements. Government Information Quarterly 28, 303--309.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosson, M. B., Ballin, J. and Rode, J. 2005. Who, What, and How: A Survey of Informal and Professional Web Developers. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 199--206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson, T. 2009. A Longitudinal Study on Higher Education Web Accessibility: Implications for Advocates. In 12th Annual Accessing Higher Ground Accessible Media, Web and Technology Conference, Boulder, Colorado, November 10--14,.Google Scholar
- Trewin, S., Cragun, B., Swart, C., Brezin, J. and Richards, J. 2010. Accessibility challenges and tool features: an IBM Web developer perspective. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), Raleigh, North Carolina, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 32:1--32:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giving keyboard focus to an embedded Flash movie http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/155/tn_15586.html.Google Scholar
- W3C CSS Validation Service http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/.Google Scholar
- W3C Validation Markup Service http://validator.w3.org/.Google Scholar
- Web Accessibility Checker http://achecker.ca/checker/index.php.Google Scholar
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 W3C Recommedation 11 December 2008 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Guidelines, icons and marketable skills: an accessibility evaluation of 100 web development company homepages
Recommendations
Experienced barriers in web applications and their comparison to the WCAG guidelines
USAB'11: Proceedings of the 7th conference on Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society: information Quality in e-HealthA German organization established the study “Web 2.0 Accessible” in 2008 which asked Internet users with disabilities about the barriers they experience when using websites and web applications. This paper gives some interesting facts of the study which ...
Can the Web Be Made Accessible for People with Intellectual Disabilities?
This article presents the findings of a research project that aimed to contribute to the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in the World Wide Web (the Web). The Inclusive New Media Design (INMD) project brought together ...
Accessibility of Indian Government Web Portals with respect to WCAG 2.0 and GIGW Guidelines
ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceWeb portals are excellent means to connect with people. Governments in many countries are making innovative use of web portals for effective governance. While doing so one of the major requirements is to make the web portals accessible to all citizens ...
Comments