ABSTRACT
Access is what the web is 'about', it is the motivation behind its creation, and it is the rationale behind HTML. The desire to provide all users at CERN with the ability to access all documents was Tim Berners-Lee's primary goal, and this goal must also be carried through to equal access for all users. But this equality of access -- accessibility -- is difficult to quantify, define, or agree upon. In a constantly evolving field, understanding each other can be tricky; indeed, there are many different definitions in the literature, all with a different perspective. This makes it difficult for our community to interact, reach agreement, or share understanding. What is more, it makes it very difficult for those outside the web accessibility community to understand, plan, budget, enact policy, or conform to accessibility requirements and legislation when the community itself has so many, in some cases, conflicting definitions. We asked over 300 people, with an interest in accessibility, to discuss their views and definitions in an attempt to harmonise our understanding and support the expectations of users outside the community. We find that misunderstanding accessibility definitions, language, and terms might cause tension between different groups. That social, and not economic, aspects drive our perspectives of accessibility, and that definitions used by standards and regulatory bodies are most accepted - not those of individual experts. Forcing accessibility adoption does not encourage the acceptance of an accessibility ethos, but providing empirical evidence that accessibility benefits all, does. Finally, realistic and concise language was preferred when attempting to communicate, or define accessibility.
- Section 508 standards. Access Board of the U. S. Federal Government. http://www.section508.gov/.Google Scholar
- Shadi Abou-Zahra. Web accessibility evaluation. In Simon Harper and Yeliz Yesilada, editors, Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, Human-Computer Interaction Series, chapter 7, pages 79--106. Springer, London, 1st edition, September 2008.Google Scholar
- Andrew Arch. Web accessibility for older users: successes and opportunities (keynote). In W4A '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A), pages 1--6, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giorgio Brajnik. Beyond conformance: The role of accessibility evaluation methods. In WISE '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshops on Web Information Systems Engineering, pages 63--80, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giorgio Brajnik, Yeliz Yesilada, and Simon Harper. Testability and validity of wcag 2.0: The expertise effect. In To be published at ASSETS 2010: In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wendy Chisholm and Matt May. Universal Design for Web Applications. O'Reilly Media, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alistair D. N. Edwards, editor. Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction. Cambridge university press, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shawn Henry. Just Ask: Integrating Accessibility Throughout Design. Georgia Tech Research Corporation, 2004.Google Scholar
- Shawn Lawton Henry and Andrew Arch. Developing a web accessibility business case for your organization: Overview. W3C WAI, http://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/.Google Scholar
- Morten Hertzum and Torkil Clemmensen. How do usability professionals construe usability? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70:26--42, January 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Ivory and M. Hearst. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Computer Surveys, 33(4):470--516, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Effie Lai-Chong Law, Virpi Roto, Marc Hassenzahl, Arnold P. O. S. Vermeeren, and Joke Kort. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '09, pages 719--728, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Lazar, Alfreda Dudley-Sponaugle, and Kisha-Dawn Greenidge. Improving web accesibility: A study of webmasters perceptions. Computers in Human Behaviour, 20:269--288, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ueki Makoto. What is "web accessibility"? Bulletin of the Japan Special Libraries Association, (218):28--33, 2006.Google Scholar
- Michael Paciello. Web accessibility for people with disabilities. CMP books, CMP media LLC, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Petrie and O. Kheir. The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 397--406, San Jose, CA, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Shneiderman. Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):84--91, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- British Standards. Ergonomics of human-system interaction (part 20: Accessibility guidelines for information/communication technology (ict) equipment and services (iso 9241-20:2008)). Technical report, ISO, 2008.Google Scholar
- J. Thatcher, M. Burks, C. Heilmann, S. Henry, A. Kirkpatrick, B. Lawson, B. Regan, R. Rutter, M. Urban, and C. Waddell. Web Accessibility, Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance. Springer-Verlag, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jim Thatcher, Cynthia Waddell, Shawn Henry, Sarah Swierenga, Mark Urban, Michael Burks, Bob Regan, and Paul Bohman. Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Glasshaus, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markel Vigo and Giorgio Brajnik. Automatic web accessibility metrics: Where we are and where we can go. Interacting with Computers, 23:137--155, March 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W3C WAI. Introduction to web accessibility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php, 2005.Google Scholar
- Yeliz Yesilada, Giorgio Brajnik, and Simon Harper. Barriers common to mobile and disabled web users. Interacting With Computers, 23(5):525--542, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yeliz Yesilada, Alan Chuter, and Shawn Lawton Henry. Shared Web Experiences: Barriers Common to Mobile Device Users and People with Disabilities. W3C, 2008. http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences.Google Scholar
- Yeliz Yesilada, Simon Harper, Tianyi Chen, and Shari Trewin. Small device users situationally impaired by input. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3):427--435, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Understanding web accessibility and its drivers
Recommendations
Towards a unified definition of web accessibility
W4A '15: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All ConferenceTo better understand what researchers and practitioners consider to be the key components of the definition of web accessibility and to propose a unified definition of web accessibility, we conducted an analysis of 50 definitions of web accessibility. ...
Web accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: a study of 50 homepages
This paper reports on a study of 50 homepages in the Mid-Atlantic United States to determine what accessibility problems exist. The 50 homepages were evaluated using both the U.S. government's Section 508 guidelines as well as the Web Accessibility ...
Web accessibility in Turkey: awareness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals
Ensuring web accessibility for all is not an easy task and requires the awareness, understanding and practices of people with different roles. User experience professionals (UXPs) play an important role in ensuring web accessibility for all. However, in ...
Comments