ABSTRACT
A paradigmatic quality of interactive interfaces is that they allow users to express themselves, thereby converting message receivers into communication sources. We define this quality as Source Interactivity [26, 29], and test its effects on user experience with a field experiment (N=141) of a portal site featuring cosmetic customization, functional customization and blogging (active versus filter). In demonstrating the psychological influence of source-based interactivity on such outcomes as user engagement, sense of agency, sense of community, intrinsic motivation and attitudes toward the interface, we discuss how designers can use them for creating interactive tools for self-expression.
- Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24, 4 (2000), 665--694. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baghaei, N., Kimani, S., Freyne, J., Brindal, E., Berkovsky, S. and Smith, G. Engaging families in lifestyle changes through social networking. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27, 10 (2011), 971--990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bailey, R. W., and Bolls, P. How avatar customizability affects children's arousal and subjective presence during junk food-sponsored online video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 3 (2009), 277--283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baker, J. R. and Moore, S. M. Blogging as a social tool: A psychosocial examination of the effects of blogging. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 6 (2008), 747--749.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Busselle, R. and Bilandzic, H. Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory 18, 2 (2008), 255--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cheng, R., and Vassileva, J. User motivation and persuasion strategy for peer-to-peer communities. In Proc. HICSS'38 (2005), Hawaii, USA, 193--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row, 1990.Google Scholar
- Firpo, D., Kasemvilas, S., Ractham, P. and Zhang, X. Generating a sense of community in a graduate educational setting through persuasive technology. In Proc. Persuasive Technology, ACM Press (2009), Article 41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Flemming, M. A. and Petty, R. E. Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Attitude, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership. Mahawah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.Google Scholar
- Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., and Blanchard, C. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale. Motivation and emotion 24, 3 (2000), 175--213.Google Scholar
- Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. User experience: A research agenda. Behavior and Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 91--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Higgins, E. T. Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review 113, 3 (2006), 439--460.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hu, Y. and Sundar, S. S. Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Communication Research 37, 1 (2010), 105--132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huang, C., Shen, Y.-Z., Lin, H.-X. and Chang, S.-S. Bloggers' motivations and behaviors: A model. Journal of Advertising Research 47, 4 (2007), 472--484.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iyengar, S. and Lepper, M. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000), 995--1006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kalyanaraman, S. and Sundar, S. S. The psychological appeal of personalized content in Web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication 56 (2006), 110--132.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kumkale, G. T. and Albarracin, D. The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 130 (2004), 143--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marathe, S. S. and Sundar, S. S. The 'me' revolution in mediated communication: Investigating the psychology of cosmetic and functional customization. In Proc. International Communication Association, 2011.Google Scholar
- Marathe, S. S. and Sundar, S. S. What drives customization? Control or identity? In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 781--790. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marathe, S. S., Sundar, S. S., Bijvank, M. N., et al. Who are these power users anyway? Building a psychological profile. In Proc. International Communication Association, 2007.Google Scholar
- O'Brien, H. L., Toms, E. G., Kelloway, E. K. and Kelley, E. Developing and evaluating a reliable measure of user engagement. In Proc. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990), 367--374.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rivera, D. The effect of content customization on learnability and perceived workload. In Proc. CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press (2005), 1749--1752. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stavrositu, C., and Sundar, S. S. (2008). Can blogs empower women? Designing agency-enhancing and community-building interfaces. In Proc. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 2781--2786. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sundar, S. S. Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In E. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, and S. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 58--74). New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
- Sundar, S. S. Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, and U.-D. Reips (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology, (pp. 89--104). Oxford University Press Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
- Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S. and Brown, J. Explicating website interactivity: Impression-formation effects in political campaign sties. Communication Research 30 (2003), 30--59.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sundar, S. S., and Marathe, S. S. Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research 36 (2010), 298--322.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., and Bellur, S. Designing interactivity in media interfaces: A communications perspective. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 2247--2256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ulken, E. Measuring user engagement: Lessons from BusinessWeek. Online Journalism Review. http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/eulken/200904/1696/.Google Scholar
- Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schemeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M. and Tice, D. M. Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2008), 883--989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wei, L. Filter blogs vs. personal journals: Understanding the knowledge production gap on the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2009), 532--558.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winer, D. The history of weblogs. 2002. http://oldweblogscomblog.scripting.com/historyOfWeblogs.Google Scholar
- Xiao, J., Stasko, J., and Catrambone, R. The role of choice and customization on users' interaction with embodied conversational agents: Effects on perception and performance. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 1293--1302. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, F.-Y. Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system, Computers in Human Behavior 25, 5 (2009), 1129--1138. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Interactivity as self-expression: a field experiment with customization and blogging
Recommendations
Designing interactivity in media interfaces: a communications perspective
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInteractivity has become ubiquitous in the digital media landscape. Numerous interactive tools are designed, tested, deployed and evaluated. Yet, we do not have generalizable knowledge about the larger concept of interactivity and its psychological ...
Interactivity and user participation in the television lifecycle: creating, sharing, and controlling content
UXTV '08: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and videoInteractive TV research encompasses a rather diverse body of work (e.g. multimedia, HCI, CSCW, UIST, user modeling, media studies) that has accumulated over the past 20 years. In this article, we highlight the state-of-the-art and consider two basic ...
Identification, Transparency, Interactivity: Towards a New Paradigm for Credibility for Single-Voice Blogs
This article explores traditional conceptualizations of credibility relying on quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected by the Institute for the Future of the Book, which conducted an online survey of readers of Pharyngula and Informed ...
Comments