skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2207789acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lost in translation: understanding the possession of digital things in the cloud

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

People are amassing larger and more diverse collections of digital things. The emergence of Cloud computing has enabled people to move their personal files to online places, and create new digital things through online services. However, little is known about how this shift might shape people's orientations toward their digital things. To investigate, we conducted in depth interviews with 13 people comparing and contrasting how they think about their possessions, moving from physical ones, to locally kept digital materials, to the online world. Findings are interpreted to detail design and research opportunities in this emerging space.

References

  1. Barkhuss, L., Tashiro, J. 2010. Student socialization in the age of facebook. Proc. of CHI '10, 133--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Crosett, K. 2011. Marketers to Promote Cloud Computing to Consumers. Marketing Forecast. Last accessed: Sept 17, 2011. http://www.marketingforecast.com/archives/11007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Edmondson, A., McManus, S. 2007. Methodological Fit in Management Field Research. Academy of Management Re-view, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1155--1179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Geambasu, R., Kohno, T., Levy, A., Levy, H. 2009. Vanish: increasing data privacy with self-destructing data. Proc. of Usenix Security Symposium'09, 299--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kaye, J. et al. 2006. To have and to hold: Exploring the personal archive. Proc. of CHI'06, 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kirk, D., Sellen, A. 2010. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. TOCHI, 17, 3, 1--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lenhart, A. 2010. Social Media and Young Adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, Q., Safavi-Naini, R., Seppard, S. 2003. Digital rights management for content distribution. Proc. of ACSW '03, 49--58. ACM press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marshall, C., Shipman, F. 2011. Social media ownership: using twitter as a window onto current attitudes and beliefs. Proc. of CHI '11, 1081--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Marshall, C. 2007. McCown, F., Nelson, M. 2007. Evaluating Personal Archiving Strategies for Internet-based Information. Proc. of IS&T Archiving, 151--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayer-Schoenberger, V. 2011. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. London: Guardian Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mazurek, M. L, Thereska, E., Gunawardena, D., Harper, R., Scott, J. 2012. ZZFS: A hybrid device and cloud file system for spontaneous users. Proc. of FAST' 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Miller, D. 2009. The Comfort of Things. Polity Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, D. (ed.). 2005. Materiality. Duke University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. 2011. Teenagers and Their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. Proc. of CHI '11, 1491--1500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Petrelli, D., Whittaker, S., Brockmeier, J. 2008. Auto-Topography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? Proc. of CHI '08, 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Stutzman, F., Kramer-Duffield, J. 2010. Friends Only: Examining a Privacy-Enhancing Behavior in Facebook. Proc. of CHI'10, 1553--1562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., Ingram, J. 2007. The Design of Everyday Life. Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Dyne, L., Pierce, J. 2003. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession. J. Organiz. Behav. 25, 439--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Whittaker, S., Bergman, O., Clough, P. 2010. Easy on that trigger dad: a study of long term family photo retrieval. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 14, 1, 31--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Lost in translation: understanding the possession of digital things in the cloud

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader