skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208399acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Involving children in the design process of interactive technology can greatly enhance its likelihood of successful adoption. However, children's input and ideas require careful interpretation to reach viable designs and technical specifications, which poses a significant challenge to an adult design research team. In this paper we discuss our approach to managing the complexity of combining concepts and ideas that were generated through participatory design work with the practical, technical, ethical and theoretical constraints of developing a technologically enhanced learning environment for children with and without Autism Spectrum Conditions. We found that the nature of this design problem did not lend itself to be rationally reduced to produce a single solution, but required an understanding of interpretive and speculative approaches for us to be able to cope with the complexity of requirements. We describe a workshop in which members of the design team used such approaches to develop a design brief that is faithful to the children's input. By making this process transparent, we aim to contribute to the methodology of using such designerly approaches in combination with participatory and human-centred methods to develop interactive technology.

References

  1. Dindler, C., and Iversen, O. S. Fictional Inquiry - design collaboration in a shared narrative space. CoDesign 3, 4 (December 2007), 213--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Druin, A. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children With Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, ACM Press New York, NY, USA (1999), 592--599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Druin, A. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ehn, P. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts, 2nd ed. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm, Sweden, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., and Keay-Bright, W. E. Phenomenology, a framework for Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM Press (New York, NY, USA, November 2010), 187--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., and Keay-Bright, W. E. Designing Technology for Children with Special Needs - Bridging Perspectives through Participatory Design. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 7, 1 (March 2011), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Golan, O., Ashwin, E., Granader, Y., McClintock, S., Day, K., Leggett, V., and Baron-Cohen, S. Enhancing emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum conditions: an intervention using animated vehicles with real emotional faces. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 40, 3 (2010), 269--279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray, C. A., and Garand, J. D. Social Stories: Improving Responses of Student with Autism with Accurate Social Information. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 8, 1 (April 1993), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Guha, M. L., Druin, A., and Fails, J. A. Designing With and for Children With Special Needs: an Inclusionary Model. In IDC '08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 61--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gutstein, S. E., and Whitney, T. Asperger Syndrome and the Development of Social Competence. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 17, 3 (2002), 161--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hornof, A. J. Designing with children with severe motor impairments. In CHI '09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2009), 2177--2180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jones, C., McIver, L., Gibson, L., and Gregor, P. Experiences Obtained from Designing With Children. In IDC '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Interaction design and children, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2003), 69--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Keay-Bright, W. E. The Reactive Colours Project: Demonstrating Participatory and Collaborative Design Methods for the Creation of Software for Autistic Children. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal 1, 2 (2007), 7--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mattelmäki, T., and Battarbee, K. Empathy probes. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (2002), 266--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Moraveji, N., Li, J., Ding, J., O'Kelley, P., and Woolf, S. Comicboarding: using comics as proxies for participatory design with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '07, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 1371--1374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Murray, D., and Lesser, M. Autism and Computing. http://www.autismandcomputing.org.uk, 2009. Last checked: 25 Feb 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Petersson, E. Non-formal learning through ludic engagement within interactive environments. PhD thesis, Malmo University, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Prizant, B., Wetherby, A., Rubin, E., Laurent, A., and Rydell, P. The SCERTS#8482; Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rittel, H., and Webber, M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stolterman, E. The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. van Rijn, H., and Stappers, P. J. The Puzzling Life of Autistic Toddlers: Design Guidelines from the LINKX Project. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2008 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright, P., and McCarthy, J. Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '08, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader