Lee B. Erickson
ABSTRACT
"Crowdsourcing" is commonly defined as the use of large groups of individuals by organizations to perform tasks traditionally performed by employees or designated agents. Currently, organizations are turning to the crowd to complete a wide variety of organization tasks. However, we know little about the types of tasks completed, the different crowds that participate, and the characteristics that manifest themselves in these initiatives. Preliminary findings from a grounded theory study designed to identify patterns and themes found in crowdsourced initiatives have revealed four common uses of the crowd (i.e., productivity, innovation, knowledge capture, and marketing/branding). Additionally, reoccurring themes related to the knowledge the crowd brings to the task, the location of the crowd, as well as organizational challenges and value capture have been identified. Emerging patterns and relationships among the four identified uses and these reoccurring themes are discussed.
- Archak, N. (2010). Money, glory and entry deterrence: Analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com. Proceedings of The 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 21--30. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bonabeau, E. (2009, Winter). Decision 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 45--52.Google Scholar
- Bryant, A. & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Chanal, V., & Caron-Fasan, M. L. (2008, May). How to invent a new business model based on crowdsourcing: The Crowdspirit case. Paper presented at the Conférence de l'Association Internationale de Management Stratégique, Nice.Google Scholar
- Chilton, S. (2009). Crowdsourcing is radically changing the geodata landscape: Case study of OpenStreetMap. Paper presented at the 24th International Cartographic Conference, Chile.Google Scholar
- Dey, I. (2007). Grounding categories. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, (pp. 167--190). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O'Reilly, P. (2009). Institutionalizing information asymmetry: Governance structures for open innovation. Information Technology & People, 22(4),Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L., (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Gregor, S. (2006, September). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611--642. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Halavais, A. (2009, April). Do dugg diggers Digg diligently? Feedback as motivation in collaborative moderation systems. Information, Communications & Society, 12(3), 444--459.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Howe, J. (2006). Crowdsourcing: A definition. Retrieved November 30, 2009 from http://www.crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html.Google Scholar
- Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Crown Business. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jouret, G. (2009). Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 43.Google Scholar
- Kleemann, F., Voß, G. G., & Rieder, K. (2008, July). Un(der)paid innovators: The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 4(1) 5--26.Google Scholar
- Knudsen, M. P., & Mortensen, T. B. (2011). Some immediate -- but negative -- effects of openness on product development performance. Technovation, 31(1), 54--64.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Malone, Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. (2010). The Collective Intelligence Genome. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(3), 21--31.Google Scholar
- Meyers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 241--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meyers, M.D. (2009). Qualitative Research in Business Management. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. (1993). CASE Tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 7(3), 309--340. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reichwald, R., Seifert, S., Walcher, D., & Piller F. (2004, January). Customers as part of value webs: Towards a framework for webbed customer innovation tools. Proceedings from 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, W. (2005, Autumn). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schenk, E. & Guittard, C. (2009). Crowdsourcing: What can be outsourced to the crowd and why? Manuscript. Retrieved from L'archive ouverte pluridiciplinaire database.Google Scholar
- Stern, P. N. (2007). On solid ground: Essential properties for growing grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, (pp. 114--126). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Trompette, P., Chanal, V., & Pelissier, C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a way to access external knowledge for innovation: Control, incentive and coordination in hybrid forms of innovation. Proceedings of the 24th EGOS Colloquium.Google Scholar
- Wasko, M. M. & Teigland, R. (2004). Public goods or virtual commons? Applying theories of public goods, social dilemmas, and collective action to electronic networks of practice. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(1), 25--41.Google Scholar
- Whitla, P. (2009, March). Crowdsourcing and its application in marketing activities. Contemporary Management Research, 5(1), 15--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Organizational uses of the crowd: developing a framework for the study of crowdsourcing
Recommendations
Leveraging the crowd as a source of innovation: does crowdsourcing represent a new model for product and service innovation?
SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People ResearchIn today's fact-paced global marketplace, many organizations are turning to the "crowd" as a potential new source of innovation. However, little is known about the strategic use of crowd and how best to integrate them into internal processes. This paper ...
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?
This study extends earlier empirical research into organizational decline which has found that substandard performance stimulates innovation in a wide range of manufacturing industries. Using data from 74 U.S. high technology firms, this research ...
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?
This study extends earlier empirical research into organizational decline which has found that substandard performance stimulates innovation in a wide range of manufacturing industries. Using data from 74 U.S. high technology firms, this research ...
Comments