Ronald P. Loui
- Alchourron, C. "Philosophical foundations of deontic logic and the logic of defeasible conditionals," in J. Me~er and R. Wieringa, eds., Deontic Logic in Comp. Sci., wiley, 1993. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Audi, R. Practical Reasoning, Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
- Austin, J. Philosophical Papers, Oxford, 196 I.Google Scholar
- Baker, B. "The excuse of accident," Ethics 93, 1983.Google Scholar
- Baker, G. "A new foundation for semantics," Ratio 16, 1974.Google Scholar
- Baker, G. "Defeasibility and Meaning," in P. Hacker and J. Raz, eds., Law, Morality and Society, Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
- Barry, B. Political Argument, U. C. Berkeley, 1965.Google Scholar
- Bayles, M. Hart's Legal Philosophy, Kluwer, 1992.Google Scholar
- Belzer, M. "Reasoning with defeasible principles," Synthese 66, 1986.Google Scholar
- Bentham, J. "Of human actions in general," An Introduction to The Principles of Morals and Legislation, with notes by L. Lafleur, Hafner, 1948a. Also W. Harrison, ed., Oxford, 1948b. J. Bums and H. L. A. Hart, eds. Athtone, 1970.Google Scholar
- Bix, B. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy, Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
- Causey, R. "The epistemic basis of defeasible reasoning," Minds and Machines 1, 1991.Google Scholar
- Cherry, C. "The limits of defeasibility," Analysis 34, 1974.Google Scholar
- Chisholm, R. "The ethics of requirement," Am. Phil. Q. 1, 1964a.Google Scholar
- Chisholm, R. "The descriptive element in the concept of action," J. Phil. 61, 1964b.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Doyle, J. A Model for Deliberation, Action, and Introspection, MIT doctoral dissertation, 1980.Google Scholar
- Ewing, A. C. The Individual, The State, and World Government, New York Press, 1947.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, J. "Action and Responsibility," in M. Black, ed., Philosophy in America, Cornell, 1965.Google Scholar
- Feinberg, J. Doing and Deserving, Princeton, 1970.Google Scholar
- Firth, R. "Coherence, certainty, and epistemic priority," J. Phil. 61, 1964.Google Scholar
- Frankena, W. Science, Language, and Human Rights, Univ. Penn. Press, 1952.Google Scholar
- Frankena, W. "Natural and inalienable fights," Phil. Rev. 64, 1955.Google Scholar
- Gauthier, D. Practical Reasoning, Oxford, 1963.Google Scholar
- Geach, P. "Ascriptivism," Phil. Rev. 69, 1960.Google Scholar
- Geach, P. "Assertion," in J. Rosenberg and C. Travis, eds., Readings in the Phil. of Language, Prentice-Hall, 1971. Originally Phil. Rev. 74, 1965.Google Scholar
- Hampshire, S. "J. L. Austin 1911 - 1960," 96-Symp~sium9 J.L. Austin, K. Farm, ed., Humanities Press, I .Google Scholar
- Hampshire, S. and H. L. A. Hart. "Decision, intention, and certainty," Mind 67, 1958.Google Scholar
- Hare, R. M. "Meaning'and speech acts," Phil. Rev. 79, 1970.Google Scholar
- Hart, H.L.A. "The ascription of responsibility and rights," in A. Flew, ed., Logic and Eanguage, B-lackwell, 1951. Originally Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1948-9.Google Scholar
- Hart, H. L. A. "A logician's fairy tale," Phil. Rev. 60, 1951.Google Scholar
- Hart, H. L. A. "Are there any natural rights?" Phil. Rev. 64, 1955.Google Scholar
- Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law, Oxford, 196 t.Google Scholar
- Hart, H.L.A. Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford, 1968.Google Scholar
- Hart, H. L. A. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar
- Howarth, W. "The feasibility of defeasibility," Cambrian Law Review 12, 1981.Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, J. "Philosophique analytique de l'action," Dialogue 23, 1984.Google Scholar
- Lascarides, A. and J. Oberlander. "Temporal coherence and defeasible knowledge," Theoretical Linguistics 18, 1992.Google Scholar
- Ladd, J. The Structure of A Moral Code, Harvard, 1957.Google Scholar
- Lehrer, K. and T. Paxson, Jr. "Knowledge: undefeated justified true belief," J. Phil. 66, 1969.Google Scholar
- Loewer, B. and M. Belzer. "Prima Facie obligation: its deconstruction and reconstruction," in John Searle and His Critics, E. LePore and R. van Gulick, eds., B lackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
- Loui, R. "Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference," Comp. Intell. 3, 1987.Google Scholar
- Loui, R. "Ampliative inference, computation, and dialectic," in R. Cummins and J. Pollock, eds., Philosophy and AI, MIT, 1991.Google Scholar
- MacCormick, N. H. L. A. Hart, Stanford, 1981.Google Scholar
- Mackie, J. "Responsibility and language," Austr. J. Phil. 33, 1955.Google Scholar
- McCarty, T. "Defeasible legal rules," AAAI Workshop on Computational Dialectics, Seattle, 1994.Google Scholar
- Melden, A. "Action," Phil. Rev. 65, 1956.Google Scholar
- Melden, A. Rights and Right Conduct, Oxford, 1959.Google Scholar
- Nell, O. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics, Columbia Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. "Moral complications and moral structures," Natural Law Forum 13, 1968.Google Scholar
- Nute, D. "Defeasible reasoning: a philosophical analysis in Prolog," in J. Fetzer, ed. Aspects ofAl, Kluwer, 1988.Google Scholar
- Perelman, C. The Idea of Justice and The Problem of Argument, Humanities Press, 1963.Google Scholar
- Pitcher, D. "Hart on Action," Phil. Rev. 69, 1960.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J. "Criteria and our knowledge of the material world," Phil. Rev. 76, 1967.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J. Knowledge and Justification, Princeton, 1974.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J. "Defeasible reasoning," Cognitive Science 11, 1987.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J. Nomic Probability and The Foundations of Induction, Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar
- Prior, A. Logic and The Basis of Ethics, Oxford, 1949.Google Scholar
- Rayfield, D. "Action," Nous 11, 1968.Google Scholar
- Raz, J. Practical Reason and Norms, Princeton, 1970.Google Scholar
- Rescher, N. Dialectics, SUNY Albany Press, 1977.Google Scholar
- Ross, W. D. The Right and The Good, Oxford, 1930.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. Speech Acts, Cambridge, 1969.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. "Prima Facie obligations," in J. Raz, Practical Reasoning, Oxford, 1978.Google Scholar
- Sosa, E. "Two conceptions of knowledge," J. Phil. 67, 1970.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, C. "Persuasive definitions," Mind 67, 1938.Google Scholar
- Swain, M., ed. Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief, Reidel, 1970.Google Scholar
- Swain, M. "Epistemic Defeasibility," in G. Pappas and M. Swain, eds. Essays on Knowledge and Justification, Comell, 1978.Google Scholar
- Toulmin, S. The Place of Reason in Ethics, Cambridge, 1950.Google Scholar
- Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, 1958.Google Scholar
- Waismann, F. "Verifiability," in A. Flew, ed., Logic and Language, Blackwell, 1951.Google Scholar
- Williams, G. Criminal Law, The General Part, Stevens, 1953.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Hart's critics on defeasible concepts and ascriptivism
Recommendations
A semantic decomposition of defeasible logics
AAAI '99/IAAI '99: Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence and the eleventh Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference innovative applications of artificial intelligenceWe investigate defeasible logics using a technique which decomposes the semantics of such logics into two parts: a specification of the structure of defeasible reasoning and a semantics for the meta-language in which the specification is written. We ...
A defeasible logic for clauses
AI'11: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Advances in Artificial IntelligenceA new non-monotonic logic called clausal defeasible logic (CDL) is defined and explained. CDL is the latest in the family of defeasible logics, which, it is argued, is important for knowledge representation and reasoning. CDL increases the expressive ...
Embedding defeasible logic into logic programming
Defeasible reasoning is a simple but efficient approach to nonmonotonic reasoning that has recently attracted considerable interest and that has found various applications. Defeasible logic and its variants are an important family of defeasible ...
Comments