skip to main content
10.1145/222124.222138acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Precise interprocedural chopping

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 1995Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Agrawal, H., "On slicing programs with jump statements," Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 94 Conference on Programming Lunguage Design and Implementation, (Orlando, FL, June 22-24, 1994), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 29(6) pp. 302-312 (June 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Ball, T. and Horwitz, S., "Slicing programs with arbitrary control flow," pp. 206-222 in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Automated and Algorithmic Debugging, (Linkoping, Sweden, May 1993). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 749, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Bannerjee, U., "Speedup of ordinary programs" Ph.D. dissertation and Tech. Rep, R-79-989, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL (October 1979). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Bates, S. and Horwitz, S., "Incremental program testing using program dependence graphs," pp. 384-396 in Conference Record of the Twentieth ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming languages, (Charleston, SC, January 10-13, 1993), ACM, New York, NY (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Binkley, D., "Using semantic differencing to reduce the cost of regression testing," Proceedings of the 1992 Conference on Software Maintenance (Orlando, Florida, November 9-12, 1992), pp. 41-50 (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Chase, D. R., Wegman, M., and Zadeck, F. K., "Analysis of pointers and structures:' Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 90 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (White Plains, NY, June 20-22, 1990), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 25(6) pp. 296-310 (June 1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Choi, J.-D. and Ferrante, J., "Static slicing in the presence of GOTO statements," ACM Trans. Program. Lung. Syst. 16(4) Pp. 1097-1113 (July 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Ferrante, J., Ottenstein, K., and Warren, J., "The program dependence graph and its use in optimization," ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 9(3) pp. 319-349 (July 1987). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Gallagher, K.B. and Lyle, J.R., "Using program slicing in software maintenance," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 17(8) pp. 751-761 (August 199 1). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Goff, G., Kennedy, K., and Tseng, C.-W., "Practical dependence testing," Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 91 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (Toronto, Ontario, June 26-28, 199 1), ACM SIG- PLAN Notices 26(6) pp. 15-29 (June 1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Horwitz, S., Pfeiffer, P., and Reps, T., "Dependence analysis for pointer variables," Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 89 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (Portland, OR, June 21-23, 1989), ACM SIG- PLAN Notices 24(7) pp. 28-40 (July 1989). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Horwitz, S., Prins, J., and Reps, T., "Integrating noninterfering versions of programs," ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 11(3) pp. 345-387 (July 1989). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Horwitz, S., Reps, T., and Binkley, D., "InterProcedural slicing using dependence graphs," ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 12(1) pp. 26-60 (January 1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Horwitz, S., "Identifying the semantic and textual differences between two versions of a program," Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 90 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (White Plains, NY, June 20-22, 1990), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 25(6) pp. 234-245 (June 1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Jackson, D. and Rollins, E.J., "A new model of program dependence for reverse engineering," SIGSOFT 94: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, (New Orleans, LA, December 7-9, 1994), ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 19 pp. 2-10 (December 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Kuck, D. J., Kuhn, R. H., Leasure, B., Padua, D. A., and Wolfe, M., "Dependence graphs and compiler optimization," pp. 207-218 in Conference Record of the Eighth ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, (Williamsburg, VA, January 26-28, 1981), ACM, New York, NY (1981). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Landi, W. and Ryder, B. G., "Pointer-induced aliasing," A problem classification," pp. 93-103 in Conference Record of the Eighteenth ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, (Orlando, FL, January 1991), ACM, New York, NY (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Lams, J.R. and Hilfinger, P. N., "Detecting conflicts between structure accesses," Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 88 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (Atlanta, GA, June 22-24, 1988), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 23(7) pp. 21-34 (July 1988). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Lyle, J. and Weiser, M., "Experiments on slicingbased debugging tools," in Proceedings of the First Conference on Empirical Studies of Programming, (June 1986), Ablex Publishing Co. (1986). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Markosian, L., Newcomb, P., Brand, R., Burson, S., and Kitzmiller, T., "Using an enabling technology," Commun. of the ACM 37(5) pp. 58-70 (May 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Maydan, D. E., Hennessy, J.L., and Lam, M. S., "Efficient and exact data dependence analysis," Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 91 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (Toronto, Ontario, June 26-28, 199 1), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 26(6) pp. 1-14 (June 1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Ning, J.Q., Engberts, A., and Kozaczynski, W., "Automated support for legacy code understanding," Commun. of the ACM 37(5) pp. 50-57 (May 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Ottenstein, K.J. and Ottenstein, L. M., "The program dependence graph in a software development environment," Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT/SIGPLAN Software Engineering Symposium on Practical Software Development Environments, (Pittsburgh, PA, Apr. 23-25, 1984), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 19(5) pp. 177-184 (May 1984). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Pugh, W., "The omega test: a fast and practical integer programming algorithm for dependence analysis," in Supercomputing 1991, (November 1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.Pugh, W. and Wonnacott, D., 'Eliminating false data dependence using the omega test," Proceedings of the ACM SIG- PLAN 92 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, (San Francisco, CA, June 17-19, 1992), ACM SIGPLAN Notices 27(7) pp. 140-151 (July 1992). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.Reps, T., "Demonstration of a prototype tool for program integration," TR-8 19, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (January 1989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Reps, T., Sagiv, M., and Horwitz, S., "Interprocedural dataflow analysis via graph reachability," TR 94-14, Datalogisk Institut, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (April 1994). (Available on the World Wide Web at ftp://ftp.diku. dk/diku/semantics/papers/D-2 15.ps.Z.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.Reps, T., Horwitz, S., Sagiv, M., and Resay, G., "Speeding up slicing," SIGSOFT 94: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, (New Orleans, LA, December 7-9, 1994), ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 19(5) pp. 11-20 (December 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.Reps, T., Horwitz, S., and Sagiv, M., "Precise interprocedural dataflow analysis via graph reachability," pp. 49-61 in Conference Record of the Twenty-Second ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Lunguages, (San Francisco, CA, Jan. 23-25, 1995), ACM, New York, NY (1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.Sharir, M. and Pnueli, A., "Two approaches to interprocedural data flow analysis,' pp. 189-233 in Program Flow Analysis: Theory and Applications, ed. S.S. Muchnick and N.D. Jones,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1981).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.Weiser, M., "Program slicing," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-10(4) pp. 352-357 (July 1984).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. 32.Wolfe, M. J., "Optimizing supercompilers for supercomputers," Ph.D. dissertation and Tech. Rep. R-82-1105, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL (October 1982). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Precise interprocedural chopping

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGSOFT '95: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering
            October 1995
            180 pages
            ISBN:0897917162
            DOI:10.1145/222124

            Copyright © 1995 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 October 1995

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate17of128submissions,13%

            Upcoming Conference

            FSE '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader