skip to main content
10.1145/2228360.2228578acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simultaneous flare level and flare variation minimization with dummification in EUVL

Published:03 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (EUVL) is one of the most promising Next Generation Lithography (NGL) technologies. Due to the surface roughness of the optical system used in EUVL, the rather high level of flare (i.e., scattered light) becomes one of the most critical issues in EUVL. In addition, the layout density non-uniformity and the flare periphery effect (the flare distribution at the periphery is much different from that in the center of a chip) also induce a large flare variation within a layout. Both of the high flare level and the large flare variation could worsen the control of critical dimension (CD) uniformity. Dummification (i.e., tiling or dummy fill) is one of the flare compensation strategies to reduce the flare level and the flare variation for the process with a clear-field mask in EUVL. However, existing dummy fill algorithms for Chemical-Mechanical Polishing (CMP) are not adequate for the flare mitigation problem in EUVL due to the flare periphery effect. This paper presents the first work that solves the flare mitigation problem in EUVL with a specific dummification algorithm flow considering global flare distribution. The dummification process is guided by dummy demand maps, which are generated by using a quasi-inverse lithography technique. In addition, an error-controlled fast flare map computation technique is proposed and integrated into our algorithm to further improve the efficiency without loss of computation accuracy. Experimental results show that our flow can effectively and efficiently reduce the flare level and the flare variation, which may contribute to the better control of CD uniformity.

References

  1. H. Aoyana et al., "Applicability of extreme ultraviolet lithography to fabrication of half pitch 35nm interconnects," Proc. SPIE 7636, Feb. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Chandhok et al., "Determination of the flare specification and methods to meet the CD control requirements for the 32 nm node using EUVL," Proc. SPIE 5374, Feb. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Chen, A. B. Kahng, G. Robins, and A. Zelikovsky, "Practical iterated fill synthesis for CMP uniformity," Proc. DAC, pp. 671--674, Jun. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Chen, A. B. Kahng, G. Robins, and A. Zelikovsky, "Closing the smoothness and uniformity gap in area fill synthesis," Proc. ISPD, pp. 137--142, Apr. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T.-C. Chen, G.-W. Liao, and Y.-W. Chang, "Predictive formulae for OPC with applications to lithography-friendly routing," IEEE TCAD, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 40--50, Jan. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H.-Y. Chen, S.-J. Chou, and Y.-W. Chang, "Density gradient minimization with coupling-constrained dummy fill for CMP control," Proc. ISPD, pp. 105--111, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Deng, M. D. F. Wang, K.-Y. Chao, and H. Xiang, "Coupling-aware dummy metal insertion for lithography," Proc. ASP-DAC, pp. 13--18, Jan. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. FFTW3 (Fastest Fourier Transform in the West). http://www.fftw.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Krautschik, M. Ito, I. Nishiyama, and S. Okazaki, "Impact of EUV light scatter on CD control as a result of mask density changes," Proc. SPIE 4688, Mar. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Lee et al., "A study of flare variation in extreme ultraviolet lithography for sub-22nm line and space pattern," Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., pp. 06GD09, Jan. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. lp_solve 5.5.2.0. http://lpsolve.sourceforge.net/5.5/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Myers et al., "Experimental validation of full-field extreme ultraviolet lithography flare and shadowing corrections," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 2215--2219, Nov. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. F. Schellenberg et al., "Layout compensation for EUV flare," Proc. SPIE 5751, Mar. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Shiraishi, T. Oshino, K. Murakami and H. Chiba, "Flare modeling and calculation for EUV optics," Proc. SPIE, Feb. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. V. K. Singh et al., "US patent 6,625,802: Method for modifying a chip layout to minimize within-die CD variations caused by flare variations in EUV lithography," 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Singh, "The importance of layout density control in semiconductor manufacturing," Proc. EDPW, pp. 70--74, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. O. Wood et al., "Integration of EUV Lithography in the fabrication of 22 nm node devices," Proc. SPIE 7271, Feb. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Xiang, L. Deng, R. Puri, K.-Y. Chao, and M. D. F. Wang, "Dummy fill density analysis with coupling constraints," Proc. ISPD, pp. 3--9, Mar. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Zuniga et al., "EUV flare and proximity modeling and model-based correction," Proc. SPIE7969, Feb. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Simultaneous flare level and flare variation minimization with dummification in EUVL

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '12: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Design Automation Conference
      June 2012
      1357 pages
      ISBN:9781450311991
      DOI:10.1145/2228360

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader